IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i7-8p985-994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The correlations of sexual activity, sleep problems, emotional distress, attachment styles with quality of life: comparison between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women

Author

Listed:
  • Chia‐Chen Hsieh
  • Chi‐An Chen
  • Fei‐Hsiu Hsiao
  • Shiow‐Ching Shun

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare quality of life and its related factors, which include sexual activity, sleep problems, depression, anxiety and attachment styles in close relationships, between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women. Background The majority of studies focus on examining the relationships between the late‐treatment side effects and quality of life in gynaecological cancer survivors. As a result, there is insufficient information about what are the correlations between psychosocial factors and quality of life in gynaecological cancer survivors. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods The quality of life of the 85 gynaecological cancer patients who had completed active treatments for at least six months was compared with the 85 age‐matched women without cancer history. Measures included SF‐12 Health Surveys, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, Beck Depression Inventory‐II, State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory, Sexual Activity Questionnaire and Experiences in Close Relationships‐Revised. Results There were no significant differences in the quality of life between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women. However, higher attachment‐related anxiety in close relationship was the main factor associated with the lower physical quality of life in the gynaecological cancer survivor group. In contrast, older ages were correlated with lower physical quality of life in noncancer women. Anxiety level was the main factor associated with lower mental quality of life for both groups. Conclusions Different from noncancer women, the psychosocial factor of insecure attachment in close relationships was the main factor associated with physical quality of life for gynaecological cancer survivors. Anxiety status was the common factor correlated with mental quality of life for cancer and noncancer women. Relevance to clinical practice Developing psychosocial interventions focusing on secure attachment in close relationships and anxiety management could improve physical and mental components of quality of life among gynaecological cancer survivors.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia‐Chen Hsieh & Chi‐An Chen & Fei‐Hsiu Hsiao & Shiow‐Ching Shun, 2014. "The correlations of sexual activity, sleep problems, emotional distress, attachment styles with quality of life: comparison between gynaecological cancer survivors and noncancer women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 985-994, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:985-994
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Kobleder & Hanna Mayer & Larissa Gehrig & Beate Senn, 2017. "“Promoting continuity of care”—Specialist nurses’ role experiences in gynaecological oncology: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4890-4898, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:7-8:p:985-994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.