IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i21-22p3373-3381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale for nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiang‐Chu Pai

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and validate the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale, which is based on Bandura's social cognitive theory. Background A simulation programme is a significant teaching strategy for nursing students. Nevertheless, there are few evidence‐based instruments that validate the effectiveness of simulation learning in Taiwan. Design This is a quantitative descriptive design. Methods In Study 1, a nonprobability convenience sample of 151 student nurses completed the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the instrument. In Study 2, which involved 365 student nurses, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the construct validity of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Results In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis yielded three components: self‐regulation, self‐efficacy and self‐motivation. The three factors explained 29·09, 27·74 and 19·32% of the variance, respectively. The final 12‐item instrument with the three factors explained 76·15% of variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0·94. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis identified a second‐order factor termed Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Goodness‐of‐fit indices showed an acceptable fit overall with the full model (χ2/df (51) = 3·54, comparative fit index = 0·96, Tucker–Lewis index = 0·95 and standardised root‐mean‐square residual = 0·035). In addition, teacher's competence was found to encourage learning, and self‐reflection and insight were significantly and positively associated with Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Teacher's competence in encouraging learning also was significantly and positively associated with self‐reflection and insight. Overall, theses variable explained 21·9% of the variance in the student's learning effectiveness. Conclusion The Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale is a reliable and valid means to assess simulation learning effectiveness for nursing students. Relevance to clinical practice The Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale can be used to examine nursing students' learning effectiveness and serve as a basis to improve student's learning efficiency through simulation programmes. Future implementation research that focuses on the relationship between learning effectiveness and nursing competence in nursing students is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiang‐Chu Pai, 2016. "Development and validation of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale for nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3373-3381, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3373-3381
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13463
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Anderson & David Gerbing, 1984. "The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(2), pages 155-173, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Leonidou, Constantinos N. & Fotiadis, Thomas A. & Zeriti, Athina, 2013. "Resources and capabilities as drivers of hotel environmental marketing strategy: Implications for competitive advantage and performance," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 94-110.
    2. Luke Butcher & Ian Phau & Min Teah, 2016. "Brand prominence in luxury consumption: Will emotional value adjudicate our longing for status?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 701-715, November.
    3. Enno Siemsen & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2007. "Least Absolute Deviation Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 36(2), pages 227-265, November.
    4. Orchida Fayez & Burhan Ozfidan & Hala Ismail, 2023. "The Praxis of User Experience (UX) in the Design of Undergraduate Online Classes: Framing the Perceptions of Engineering and Social Sciences Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Yuan, Ke-Hai & Chan, Wai, 2008. "Structural equation modeling with near singular covariance matrices," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4842-4858, June.
    6. Mansoora Ahmed & Sun Zehou & Syed Ali Raza & Muhammad Asif Qureshi & Sara Qamar Yousufi, 2020. "Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2225-2239, September.
    7. Mohan, Geetha & Sivakumaran, Bharadhwaj & Sharma, Piyush, 2012. "Store environment's impact on variety seeking behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 419-428.
    8. Wen Tang & Xiangyang Zhang & Youyi Tian, 2023. "Investigating Lifelong Learners’ Continuing Learning Intention Moderated by Affective Support in Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Julia Morgan & Casey Canfield, 2021. "Comparing Behavioral Theories to Predict Consumer Interest to Participate in Energy Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Sharifah Rahama Amirul & Khairul Hanim Pazim & Sharifah Milda Amirul & Rasid Mail & Jakaria Dasan, 2022. "Developing and validating the qualitative labour productivity measurement in service industry," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2853-2874, August.
    11. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    12. Kenneth Bollen & Stanislav Kolenikov & Shawn Bauldry, 2014. "Model-Implied Instrumental Variable—Generalized Method of Moments (MIIV-GMM) Estimators for Latent Variable Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 20-50, January.
    13. O'Connor, Neale G. & Luo, Yadong & Lee, Danny K. Y., 2001. "Self-selection, socialization and budget control in the PRC: a study of a U.S.-Sino joint venture and Chinese state-owned enterprise," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 135-148, May.
    14. Kailun Fang & Suzana Ariff Azizan & Yifei Wu, 2023. "Low-Carbon Community Regeneration in China: A Case Study in Dadong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Ke-Hai Yuan & Ying Cheng & Wei Zhang, 2010. "Determinants of Standard Errors of MLEs in Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 633-648, December.
    16. Md Altab Hossin & Md Sajjad Hosain & Michelle Frempomaa Frempong & Stephen Sarfo Adu-Yeboah & Mohitul Ameen Ahmed Mustafi, 2021. "What Drives Sustainable Organizational Performance? The Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Sustainable Organizational Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Tsourela Maria & Roumeliotis Manos, 2017. "Technology-Based Services Adoption: A Comparison of the Major Applications," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Sadhan Maiti & Bishwa Mukherjee, 1990. "A note on distributional properties of the Jöreskog-Sörbom fit indices," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 721-726, December.
    19. Md Sajjad Hosain & Md Altab Hossin & Yin Xiaohua & Md Aktaruzzaman & Mohitul Ameen Ahmed Mustafi, 2020. "Social Networking Information and Pre-Employment Background Checks: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Organizational Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Anne Boomsma, 1985. "Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in lisrel maximum likelihood estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 229-242, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3373-3381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.