IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i21-22p3373-3381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale for nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiang‐Chu Pai

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop and validate the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale, which is based on Bandura's social cognitive theory. Background A simulation programme is a significant teaching strategy for nursing students. Nevertheless, there are few evidence‐based instruments that validate the effectiveness of simulation learning in Taiwan. Design This is a quantitative descriptive design. Methods In Study 1, a nonprobability convenience sample of 151 student nurses completed the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Exploratory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the instrument. In Study 2, which involved 365 student nurses, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were used to analyse the construct validity of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Results In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis yielded three components: self‐regulation, self‐efficacy and self‐motivation. The three factors explained 29·09, 27·74 and 19·32% of the variance, respectively. The final 12‐item instrument with the three factors explained 76·15% of variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0·94. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis identified a second‐order factor termed Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Goodness‐of‐fit indices showed an acceptable fit overall with the full model (χ2/df (51) = 3·54, comparative fit index = 0·96, Tucker–Lewis index = 0·95 and standardised root‐mean‐square residual = 0·035). In addition, teacher's competence was found to encourage learning, and self‐reflection and insight were significantly and positively associated with Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale. Teacher's competence in encouraging learning also was significantly and positively associated with self‐reflection and insight. Overall, theses variable explained 21·9% of the variance in the student's learning effectiveness. Conclusion The Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale is a reliable and valid means to assess simulation learning effectiveness for nursing students. Relevance to clinical practice The Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale can be used to examine nursing students' learning effectiveness and serve as a basis to improve student's learning efficiency through simulation programmes. Future implementation research that focuses on the relationship between learning effectiveness and nursing competence in nursing students is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiang‐Chu Pai, 2016. "Development and validation of the Simulation Learning Effectiveness Scale for nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3373-3381, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3373-3381
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13463
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Anderson & David Gerbing, 1984. "The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(2), pages 155-173, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luke Butcher & Ian Phau & Min Teah, 2016. "Brand prominence in luxury consumption: Will emotional value adjudicate our longing for status?," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(6), pages 701-715, November.
    2. Enno Siemsen & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2007. "Least Absolute Deviation Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 36(2), pages 227-265, November.
    3. Yuan, Ke-Hai & Chan, Wai, 2008. "Structural equation modeling with near singular covariance matrices," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 4842-4858, June.
    4. Mansoora Ahmed & Sun Zehou & Syed Ali Raza & Muhammad Asif Qureshi & Sara Qamar Yousufi, 2020. "Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2225-2239, September.
    5. Wen Tang & Xiangyang Zhang & Youyi Tian, 2023. "Investigating Lifelong Learners’ Continuing Learning Intention Moderated by Affective Support in Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Sharifah Rahama Amirul & Khairul Hanim Pazim & Sharifah Milda Amirul & Rasid Mail & Jakaria Dasan, 2022. "Developing and validating the qualitative labour productivity measurement in service industry," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2853-2874, August.
    7. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    8. Kailun Fang & Suzana Ariff Azizan & Yifei Wu, 2023. "Low-Carbon Community Regeneration in China: A Case Study in Dadong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Ke-Hai Yuan & Ying Cheng & Wei Zhang, 2010. "Determinants of Standard Errors of MLEs in Confirmatory Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 633-648, December.
    10. Tsourela Maria & Roumeliotis Manos, 2017. "Technology-Based Services Adoption: A Comparison of the Major Applications," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Md Sajjad Hosain & Md Altab Hossin & Yin Xiaohua & Md Aktaruzzaman & Mohitul Ameen Ahmed Mustafi, 2020. "Social Networking Information and Pre-Employment Background Checks: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Organizational Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Wai Chan & Peter Bentler, 1998. "Covariance structure analysis of ordinal ipsative data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 369-399, December.
    13. Ke-Hai Yuan & Yubin Tian & Hirokazu Yanagihara, 2015. "Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 379-405, June.
    14. Ai Ye & Kathleen M. Gates & Teague Rhine Henry & Lan Luo, 2021. "Path and Directionality Discovery in Individual Dynamic Models: A Regularized Unified Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Hybrid Vector Autoregression," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 404-441, June.
    15. Clement Stone & Michael Sobel, 1990. "The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 337-352, June.
    16. Roshayati Abdul Hamid, 2022. "The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Yutaka Kano, 1990. "Noniterative estimation and the choice of the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 277-291, June.
    18. Rabbanee, Fazlul K. & Ramaseshan, B. & Wu, Chen & Vinden, Amy, 2012. "Effects of store loyalty on shopping mall loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 271-278.
    19. Milfelner Borut & Gabrijan Vladimir & Snoj Boris, 2008. "Can Marketing Resources Contribute to Company Performance?," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 41(1), pages 3-13, January.
    20. Ingo Balderjahn, 1988. "A note to Bollen's alternative fit measure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 283-285, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:21-22:p:3373-3381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.