IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i17-18p2393-2401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal risk during pregnancy: a concept analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy R Van Otterloo
  • Cynthia D Connelly

Abstract

Aims and objectives To report an analysis of the concept of maternal risk and explore implications for practice using Walker and Avant's eight step method analysis. Background Although mortality during pregnancy is a relatively rare occurrence, serious maternal morbidities are increasingly present in today's pregnant population. Risk factors have been identified that increase the potential for morbidities and subsequent care modalities have been implemented to decrease this risk. However, despite the wide use of the term ‘risk’ in the medical and nursing literature, determining a common definition is difficult. Differences in the understanding of risk during pregnancy can hinder the ability to provide consistent and appropriate care. Design Concept analysis. Methods A search of the English literature was completed using the databases CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar for years 2000–2014 using the keywords ‘risk’, ‘maternal’ and ‘pregnancy’. Results Three defining attributes of risk were identified: chance of injury/loss, cognitive recognition and the decision‐making processes. The antecedent of risk is the ability to understand the situation and cognitive ability to think about the potential consequences and adverse outcomes. Consequences of risk include the actual action taken as a result of the decision‐making process. Conclusion This paper contributes to the understanding of risk allowing for the development of an individualised plan of care for each pregnant woman and empowering the nurse to advocate for appropriate care. Findings in this analysis assist nurses in bridging the gap in communication between the provider's and pregnant woman's interpretation of risk. Relevance to clinical practice The analysis of risk resulted in the identification of differences in perceptions of risk that can potentially result in miscommunication between provider and pregnant woman and increase the risk of inadequate or incomplete care.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy R Van Otterloo & Cynthia D Connelly, 2016. "Maternal risk during pregnancy: a concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2393-2401, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2393-2401
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Fishbein, 2008. "A Reasoned Action Approach to Health Promotion," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 834-844, November.
    2. Murray, Susan F. & Pearson, Stephen C., 2006. "Maternity referral systems in developing countries: Current knowledge and future research needs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(9), pages 2205-2215, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scherr, Sebastian & Reifegerste, Doreen & Arendt, Florian & van Weert, Julia C.M. & Alden, Dana L., 2022. "Family involvement in medical decision making in Europe and the United States: A replication and extension in five Countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    2. Wagner, Brandon G. & Cleland, Kelly & Batur, Pelin & Wu, Justine & Rothberg, Michael B., 2019. "Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Abhirat Supthanasup & Cathy Banwell & Matthew Kelly, 2022. "Facebook Feeds and Child Feeding: A Qualitative Study of Thai Mothers in Online Child Feeding Support Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Asare, Eris & Nakakeeto, Gertrude & Segarra, Eduardo, 2018. "Determinants of the choice of a savings option: "The case of African Households"," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266868, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Bonnie Spring, 2008. "Health Decision Making: Lynchpin of Evidence-Based Practice," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 28(6), pages 866-874, November.
    6. Lagerkvist, C.J. & Edenbrandt, A.K. & Tibbelin, I. & Wahlstedt, Y., 2020. "Preferences for sustainable and responsible equity funds - A choice experiment with Swedish private investors," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    7. Lairson, David R. & Huo, Jinhai & Ball Ricks, Katharine A. & Savas, Lara & Fernández, María E., 2013. "The cost of implementing a 2-1-1 call center-based cancer control navigator program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 51-56.
    8. Amanda J. Dillard & Mick P. Couper & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2010. "Perceived Risk of Cancer and Patient Reports of Participation in Decisions about Screening: The DECISIONS Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 96-105, September.
    9. Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi & Avoka, Cephas & Olaniran, Abimbola & Balogun, Mobolanle & Wright, Ololade & Ekerin, Olabode & Benova, Lenka, 2021. "Patterns, travel to care and factors influencing obstetric referral: Evidence from Nigeria's most urbanised state," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    10. Mohammad Alipour & Rodney A. Stewart & Oz Sahin, 2021. "Beyond the Diffusion of Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems at Scale: Allegorising the Battery Energy Storage Adoption Behaviour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    11. Bart Jacobs & Cheanrithy Men & Oeun Sam Sam & Sjoerd Postma, 2016. "Ambulance services as part of the district health system in low-income countries: a feasibility study from Cambodia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 414-429, October.
    12. Quynh Anh Nguyen & Luc Hens & Charlotte MacAlister & Lester Johnson & Boripat Lebel & Sinh Bach Tan & Hung Manh Nguyen & The Ninh Nguyen & Louis Lebel, 2018. "Theory of Reasoned Action as a Framework for Communicating Climate Risk: A Case Study of Schoolchildren in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Raz, Iris & Novack, Lena & Yitshak-Sade, Maayan & Shahar, Yemima & Wiznitzer, Arnon & Sergienko, Ruslan & Warshawsky-Livne, Lora, 2015. "Effects of changes in copayment for obstetric emergency room visits on the utilization of obstetric emergency rooms," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 1358-1365.
    14. Peder A. Halvorsen, 2010. "What Information Do Patients Need to Make a Medical Decision?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 11-13, September.
    15. Muhammad Adzran Che Mustapa & Ahmad Firdhaus Arham & Latifah Amin & Hasrizul Hashim, 2021. "Stakeholders’ Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Rice in Malaysia," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    16. Mullard, Jordan C.R. & Kawalek, Jessica & Parkin, Amy & Rayner, Clare & Mir, Ghazala & Sivan, Manoj & Greenhalgh, Trisha, 2023. "Towards evidence-based and inclusive models of peer support for long covid: A hermeneutic systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    17. Damien, Besancenot & Nicolas, Sirven & Radu, Vranceanu, 2018. "A model of hospital congestion in developing countries," ESSEC Working Papers WP1804, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    18. Marilyn Stringer & Tali Averbuch & Pamela Mack Brooks & Loretta Sweet Jemmott, 2012. "Response to Homeless Childbearing Women’s Health Care Learning Needs," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 195-212, May.
    19. Paquin, Ryan S. & Peay, Holly L. & Gehtland, Lisa M. & Lewis, Megan A. & Bailey, Donald B., 2016. "Parental intentions to enroll children in a voluntary expanded newborn screening program," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-24.
    20. Norman C. H. Wong & Eryn Bostwick, 2017. "#WhyITold: A Pilot Test of Twitter Messages Aimed at Promoting Bystander Intervention against Domestic Violence," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 166-175, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:17-18:p:2393-2401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.