IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe1189-e1201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse‐to‐nurse shift handoffs on medical–surgical units: A process within the flow of nursing care

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine M Ernst
  • Sara A McComb
  • Cathaleen Ley

Abstract

Aims and objectives To qualitatively investigate the medical–surgical nurse shift handoff as a process within the workflow of the exchanging nurses. Specifically, this study sought to identify the ideal handoff, ways the handoff deviated from ideal, and subsequent effect on nursing care. Background The functions as well as information content of the handoff have been studied. However, typical studies look at the handoff as an isolated activity utilising nurse perceptions as the primary measure of quality. Design Semi‐structured focus groups were conducted to discuss nurses’ perspectives on ideal handoffs, ways handoffs deviate from the ideal including frequent and significant deviations and the effects on subsequent care. Methods Twenty‐one medical–surgical nurses participated in one of five audio‐taped focus group sessions. Three sessions were conducted at hospital A; two sessions at unaffiliated hospital B. The general inductive approach was used to analyse verbatim transcripts. Transcript segments relevant for answering the research questions were coded as ideal or not ideal. Conceptual themes were then developed. Result Two major themes were identified: teams/teamwork and constructing and communicating a shared understanding of the patients’ conditions. The importance of nurse preparatory activities was revealed including the incoming nurses reading patients’ health records and outgoing nurses rounding on patients. The impact of shared expectations was identified across the team, where teams include, in addition to the two nurses, the electronic health record, other hospital staff and patients/families with a bedside handoff. New potential nurse‐centred process and outcome measures were proposed. Conclusions Evaluating handoffs by their effect on the nursing performance both during and after the handoff offers a new framework to objectively assess handoff effectiveness. Relevance to clinical practice The handoff is a process which may significantly affect the incoming nurse's transition into and administration of nursing care.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine M Ernst & Sara A McComb & Cathaleen Ley, 2018. "Nurse‐to‐nurse shift handoffs on medical–surgical units: A process within the flow of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1189-1201, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1189-e1201
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenelle Matic & Patricia M Davidson & Yenna Salamonson, 2011. "Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1‐2), pages 184-189, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel Cross & Julie Considine & Judy Currey, 2019. "Nursing handover of vital signs at the transition of care from the emergency department to the inpatient ward: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 1010-1021, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian‐Guo Yang & Jun Zhang, 2016. "Improving the postoperative handover process in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1062-1072, April.
    2. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    3. Beverly O'Connell & Cherene Ockerby & Mary Hawkins, 2014. "Construct validity and reliability of the Handover Evaluation Scale," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3-4), pages 560-570, February.
    4. Merete Lyngstad & Anders Grimsmo & Dag Hofoss & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2014. "Home care nurses' experiences with using electronic messaging in their communication with general practitioners," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3424-3433, December.
    5. Kristina Eivergård & Ingela Enmarker & Mona Livholts & Lena Aléx & Ove Hellzén, 2020. "Subordinated masculinities: A critical inquiry into reproduction of gender norms in handovers and rounds in a forensic psychiatric care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4227-4238, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1189-e1201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.