IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i4p451-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a perioperative pain experience

Author

Listed:
  • Margareta Warrén Stomberg
  • Ulla‐Britt Öman

Abstract

Aim. The aim was to evaluate patient's perioperative pain experience after total hip replacement and patients’ satisfaction with pain management. Background. Total hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure intended to reduce pain and return patients to better function. Realistic expectations about total hip arthroplasty is important for optimal postoperative recovery and the information must be adapted to fit the individual patient. Methods. A descriptive design was used comparing patients outcome data. Pitman's test was used for statistical analyses. Adult patients (n = 112) undergoing surgical hip replacement procedures answered a 17‐item questionnaire on the fourth postoperative day. The questionnaire included given alternatives and visual analogue scales (0–100 mm) for the pain assessment. Result. The patients’ postoperative pain experience after hip replacement surgery was in average low, 33·1 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Patient's pain experience was reported to be highest on the first postoperative day for most of the patients. The preoperative pain experience tends to be higher than the postoperative pain experience. Older patients reported less average pain level postoperatively. Satisfaction with pain management was high. Conclusion. The pain experience tends to be higher preoperatively than postoperatively. Patients who reported a higher pain experience postoperatively reported that their pain experience was significant higher than preoperative expected. Relevance to practice. It is important for the postoperative outcome measure that the patients have a realistic expectation of pain experiences after total hip arthroplasty. The nurse is one of the staff members responsible for information to the individual patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Margareta Warrén Stomberg & Ulla‐Britt Öman, 2006. "Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a perioperative pain experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 451-458, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:451-458
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01363.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01363.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01363.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williams, Brian, 1994. "Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 509-516, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sohail, Mohammad, 2005. "Accessibility and Quality of Government Primary Health Care: Achievement and Constraints," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 31(3-4), pages 63-98, Sept-Dec.
    2. Agneta Schröder & Gerd Ahlström & Bodil Wilde Larsson, 2006. "Patients’ perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 93-102, January.
    3. Mauro Serapioni & Pedro Lopes Ferreira & Patrícia Antunes, 2014. "Participação em Saúde: Conceitos e Conteúdos," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 40, pages 26-42, December.
    4. Valérie Buthion & Nathalie Dumet & Stéphanie Verfay-Bertaud & Mélissa Amate & Nathalie Havet, 2018. "EFFICARD - L’organisation des soins et la vie avec l’insuffisance cardiaque Etude exploratoire sur les interactions entre les patients et leur prise en charge," Working Papers hal-01989323, HAL.
    5. Prussing, Erica & Sobo, Elisa J. & Walker, Elizabeth & Kurtin, Paul S., 2005. "Between 'desperation' and disability rights: a narrative analysis of complementary/alternative medicine use by parents for children with Down syndrome," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 587-598, February.
    6. Jones, Andrew M. & Rice, Nigel & Robone, Silvana & Dias, Pedro Rosa, 2011. "Inequality and polarisation in health systems' responsiveness: A cross-country analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 616-625, July.
    7. Prabha Ramseook-Munhurrun & Vedmani Munhurrun & Arkrasunsingh Panchoo, 2011. "Total Quality Management Adoption In A Public Hospital: Evidence From Mauritius," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(3), pages 67-77.
    8. Le, Nga & Groot, Wim & Tomini, Sonila & Tomini, Florian, 2018. "Health insurance and patient satisfaction: Evidence from the poorest regions of Vietnam," MERIT Working Papers 2018-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Alibrandi, Angela & Gitto, Lara & Limosani, Michele & Mustica, Paolo Fabrizio, 2023. "Patient satisfaction and quality of hospital care," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Alibrandi, Angela & Gitto, Lara & Limosani, Michele & Mustica, Paolo, 2020. "Improving health performances: To what extent patient satisfaction may influence quality?," MPRA Paper 105393, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Marta Rzadkiewicz & Mariusz Jaworski & Dorota Włodarczyk, 2022. "The Brave Patient after 80—Satisfaction with Visit and Individual Determinants of Proactive Patient Attitude among the Oldest General Practice Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.
    12. Jaapar, Mustaffa & Musa, Ghazali & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh & Saub, Roslan, 2017. "Dental tourism: Examining tourist profiles, motivation and satisfaction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 538-552.
    13. Herni Justiana Astuti & Keisuke Nagase, 2014. "Patient Loyalty To Healthcare Organizations: Relationship Marketing And Satisfaction," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(2), pages 39-56.
    14. Jannie Laursen & Kristoffer Andresen & Jacob Rosenberg, 2016. "Relatives to Critically Ill Patients Have No Sense of Coherence: A Quality Improvement Article Using Mixed Methods," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-7, September.
    15. Clark, Michael & Moro, Domenico & Szczepura, Ala, 2009. "Balancing patient preferences and clinical needs: Community versus hospital based care for patients with suspected DVT," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(2-3), pages 313-319, May.
    16. Winfried Zinn & Sebastian Sauer & Richard Göllner, 2016. "The German Inpatient Satisfaction Scale," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    17. Santos, Eleonora & Khan, Shahed, 2018. "Patients' Satisfaction with the NHS: A Novel Indicator for Portugal," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 12-17.
    18. Richard Eckersley, 2000. "The Mixed Blessings of Material Progress: Diminishing Returns in the Pursuit of Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, September.
    19. Röttger, Julia & Blümel, Miriam & Fuchs, Sabine & Busse, Reinhard, 2014. "Assessing the responsiveness of chronic disease care - Is the World Health Organization's concept of health system responsiveness applicable?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 87-94.
    20. Hekkert, Karin Dorieke & Cihangir, Sezgin & Kleefstra, Sophia Martine & van den Berg, Bernard & Kool, Rudolf Bertijn, 2009. "Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 68-75, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:451-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.