IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v19y2010i6p629-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian methods in cost–effectiveness studies: objectivity, computation and other relevant aspects

Author

Listed:
  • C. Armero
  • G. García‐Donato
  • A. López‐Quílez

Abstract

In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) of a cost–effectiveness (CE) study, the unknown parameters are considered as random variables. A crucial question is what probabilistic distribution is suitable for synthesizing the available information (mainly data from clinical trials) about these parameters. In this context, the important role of Bayesian methodology has been recognized, where the parameters are of a random nature. We explore, in the context of CE analyses, how formal objective Bayesian methods can be implemented. We fully illustrate the methodology using two CE problems that frequently appear in the CE literature. The results are compared with those obtained with other popular approaches to PSA. We find that the discrepancies can be quite marked, specially when the number of patients enrolled in the simulated cohort under study is large. Finally, we describe in detail the numerical methods that need to be used to obtain the results. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Armero & G. García‐Donato & A. López‐Quílez, 2010. "Bayesian methods in cost–effectiveness studies: objectivity, computation and other relevant aspects," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 629-643, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:6:p:629-643
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.1496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1496
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.1496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony O’Hagan & John Stevens & Jacques Montmartin, 2000. "Inference for the Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curve and Cost-Effectiveness Ratio," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 339-349, April.
    2. Anthony O’Hagan & John W. Stevens, 2001. "Bayesian Assessment of Sample Size for Clinical Trials of Cost-Effectiveness," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 21(3), pages 219-230, May.
    3. A. E. Ades & Karl Claxton & Mark Sculpher, 2006. "Evidence synthesis, parameter correlation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(4), pages 373-381, April.
    4. W. R. Gilks & N. G. Best & K. K. C. Tan, 1995. "Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling Within Gibbs Sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 44(4), pages 455-472, December.
    5. J. Brown & N. J. Welton & C. Bankhead & S. H. Richards & L. Roberts & C. Tydeman & T. J. Peters, 2006. "A Bayesian approach to analysing the cost‐effectiveness of two primary care interventions aimed at improving attendance for breast screening," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 435-445, May.
    6. Nicky J. Welton & A. E. Ades, 2005. "Estimation of Markov Chain Transition Probabilities and Rates from Fully and Partially Observed Data: Uncertainty Propagation, Evidence Synthesis, and Model Calibration," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(6), pages 633-645, November.
    7. Andrew H. Briggs & Ron Goeree & Gord Blackhouse & Bernie J. O’Brien, 2002. "Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(4), pages 290-308, August.
    8. Frank A. Sonnenberg & J. Robert Beck, 1993. "Markov Models in Medical Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 13(4), pages 322-338, December.
    9. M.J. Bayarri & Gonzalo García-Donato, 2007. "Extending conventional priors for testing general hypotheses in linear models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 94(1), pages 135-152.
    10. Gordon B. Hazen & James M. Pellissier & Jayavel Sounderpandian, 1998. "Stochastic-Tree Models in Medical Decision Making," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 64-80, August.
    11. Gordon Hazen, 2000. "Preference Factoring for Stochastic Trees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 389-403, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seuk Yen Phoong, 2013. "Rubber Price Effect on Exchange Rate: A Bayesian Mixture Model Approach," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(6), pages 263-269.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zixian, Liu & Xin, Ni & Yiliu, Liu & Qinglu, Song & Yukun, Wang, 2011. "Gastric esophageal surgery risk analysis with a fault tree and Markov integrated model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1591-1600.
    2. Pedram Sendi & Huldrych F Günthard & Mathew Simcock & Bruno Ledergerber & Jörg Schüpbach & Manuel Battegay & for the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, 2007. "Cost-Effectiveness of Genotypic Antiretroviral Resistance Testing in HIV-Infected Patients with Treatment Failure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(1), pages 1-8, January.
    3. Donald L. Keefer & Craig W. Kirkwood & James L. Corner, 2004. "Perspective on Decision Analysis Applications, 1990–2001," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 4-22, March.
    4. Elena Losina & Elizabeth E Dervan & A David Paltiel & Yan Dong & R John Wright & Kurt P Spindler & Lisa A Mandl & Morgan H Jones & Robert G Marx & Clare E Safran-Norton & Jeffrey N Katz, 2015. "Defining the Value of Future Research to Identify the Preferred Treatment of Meniscal Tear in the Presence of Knee Osteoarthritis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Simon Eckermann & Andrew Willan, 2011. "Presenting Evidence and Summary Measures to Best Inform Societal Decisions When Comparing Multiple Strategies," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 563-577, July.
    6. Steven M. Shechter & Matthew D. Bailey & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "The Optimal Time to Initiate HIV Therapy Under Ordered Health States," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 20-33, February.
    7. Marta Soares & Luísa Canto e Castro, 2012. "Continuous Time Simulation and Discretized Models for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(12), pages 1101-1117, December.
    8. Marta O Soares & L Canto e Castro, 2010. "Simulation or cohort models? Continuous time simulation and discretized Markov models to estimate cost-effectiveness," Working Papers 056cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    9. Tazio Vanni & Jonathan Karnon & Jason Madan & Richard White & W. Edmunds & Anna Foss & Rosa Legood, 2011. "Calibrating Models in Economic Evaluation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 35-49, January.
    10. Marta O. Soares & Luísa Canto e Castro, 2012. "Continuous Time Simulation and Discretized Models for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 30(12), pages 1101-1117, December.
    11. England, Peter, 2002. "Addendum to "Analytic and bootstrap estimates of prediction errors in claims reserving"," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 461-466, December.
    12. Gordon Hazen, 2000. "Preference Factoring for Stochastic Trees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 389-403, March.
    13. Gordon Hazen, 2004. "Multiattribute Structure for QALYs," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 205-216, December.
    14. Heß, Michael (Ed.) & Schlieter, Hannes (Ed.), 2014. "Modellierung im Gesundheitswesen: Tagungsband des Workshops im Rahmen der Modellierung 2014," ICB Research Reports 57, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    15. Rachael DiSantostefano & Andrea Biddle & John Lavelle, 2006. "The Long-Term Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 171-191, February.
    16. repec:jss:jstsof:38:i08 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Tushar Srivastava & Nicholas R. Latimer & Paul Tappenden, 2021. "Estimation of Transition Probabilities for State-Transition Models: A Review of NICE Appraisals," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(8), pages 869-878, August.
    18. Jack Dowie, 2004. "Why cost‐effectiveness should trump (clinical) effectiveness: the ethical economics of the South West quadrant," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(5), pages 453-459, May.
    19. Villacorta, Pablo J. & Verdegay, José L., 2016. "FuzzyStatProb: An R Package for the Estimation of Fuzzy Stationary Probabilities from a Sequence of Observations of an Unknown Markov Chain," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 71(i08).
    20. Nathaniel Tomasetti & Catherine Forbes & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2019. "Updating Variational Bayes: Fast Sequential Posterior Inference," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 13/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    21. Gabriele Fiorentini & Enrique Sentana & Neil Shephard, 2004. "Likelihood-Based Estimation of Latent Generalized ARCH Structures," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(5), pages 1481-1517, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:6:p:629-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.