IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v7y2017i1p106-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multiscale hydro‐geochemical‐mechanical approach to analyze faulted CO 2 reservoirs

Author

Listed:
  • Ba Nghiep Nguyen
  • Zhangshuan Hou
  • Diana H. Bacon
  • Mark D. White

Abstract

This paper applies a multiscale hydro‐geochemical‐mechanical approach to analyze faulted CO 2 reservoirs using the STOMP‐CO2‐R code that is coupled to the ABAQUS-super-® finite element package. STOMP‐CO2‐R models the reactive transport of CO 2 causing mineral composition changes that are captured by an Eshelby‐Mori‐Tanka model implemented in ABAQUS-super-®. A three‐dimensional (3D) STOMP‐CO2‐R model for a reservoir containing an inclined fault was built to analyze a formation containing a reaction network with five minerals: albite, anorthite, calcite, kaolinite, and quartz. A 3D finite element mesh that exactly maps the STOMP‐CO2‐R grid was developed for coupled analyses. The model contains alternating sandstone and shale layers. The impact of reactive transport of CO 2 on the geomechanical properties of reservoir rocks are studied in terms of mineral composition changes that affect their geomechanical responses. Simulations assuming extensional and compressional stress regimes with and without coupled geochemistry are performed to study the stress regime effect on the risk of hydraulic fracture. The fault slip is examined as functions of stress regime, geomechanical, geochemical‐mechanical effects, fault inclination, and position. The results show that mineralogical changes due to CO 2 injection reduce the permeability and elastic modulus of the reservoir, leading to increased fluid pressure and risk of fracture in the injection location and the caprock seal. Shear failure in the fault leading to fault reactivation was not predicted to occur. However, stress regime, fault inclination, and fault position in light of the coupled hydro‐geochemical‐mechanical analysis have an important impact on the slip tendency factor and elastic fault slip. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Ba Nghiep Nguyen & Zhangshuan Hou & Diana H. Bacon & Mark D. White, 2017. "A multiscale hydro‐geochemical‐mechanical approach to analyze faulted CO 2 reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 106-127, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:106-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1616
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Streit, Jürgen E & Hillis, Richard R, 2004. "Estimating fault stability and sustainable fluid pressures for underground storage of CO2 in porous rock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1445-1456.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torben Treffeisen & Andreas Henk, 2020. "Faults as Volumetric Weak Zones in Reservoir-Scale Hydro-Mechanical Finite Element Models—A Comparison Based on Grid Geometry, Mesh Resolution and Fault Dip," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Sean P. Rigby & Ali Alsayah & Richard Seely, 2022. "Impact of Exposure to Supercritical Carbon Dioxide on Reservoir Caprocks and Inter-Layers during Sequestration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Wang, Jinkai & Feng, Xiaoyong & Wanyan, Qiqi & Zhao, Kai & Wang, Ziji & Pei, Gen & Xie, Jun & Tian, Bo, 2022. "Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Bing Bai & Xiaochun Li & Haiqing Wu & Yongsheng Wang & Mingze Liu, 2017. "A methodology for designing maximum allowable wellhead pressure for CO 2 injection: application to the Shenhua CCS demonstration project, China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 158-181, February.
    5. Javad Naseryan Moghadam & Nazmul Haque Mondol & Per Aagaard & Helge Hellevang, 2016. "Effective stress law for the permeability of clay‐bearing sandstones by the Modified Clay Shell model," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 752-774, December.
    6. Víctor Vilarrasa & Jonny Rutqvist & Antonio Pio Rinaldi, 2015. "Thermal and capillary effects on the caprock mechanical stability at In Salah, Algeria," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 449-461, August.
    7. Md Jamilur Rahman & Manzar Fawad & Nazmul Haque Mondol, 2022. "3D Field-Scale Geomechanical Modeling of Potential CO 2 Storage Site Smeaheia, Offshore Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Mingze Liu & Bing Bai & Xiaochun Li & Shuai Gao & Shaobin Hu & Lei Wang & Haiqing Wu, 2016. "Assessing the applicability of unsaturated effective stress models to tensile fracturing of sandstone in CO 2 ‐water two‐phase fluids," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 670-681, October.
    9. Sikandar Khan & Yehia Abel Khulief & Abdullatif Al-Shuhail, 2019. "Mitigating climate change via CO2 sequestration into Biyadh reservoir: geomechanical modeling and caprock integrity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 23-52, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:1:p:106-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.