IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v6y2016i6p752-774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective stress law for the permeability of clay‐bearing sandstones by the Modified Clay Shell model

Author

Listed:
  • Javad Naseryan Moghadam
  • Nazmul Haque Mondol
  • Per Aagaard
  • Helge Hellevang

Abstract

In this study, the effective stress law for the permeability of two core plugs selected from Berea (Cleveland Quarries, OH, USA) and Knorringfjellet (Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway) sandstones is studied experimentally by measuring the core permeability (k) under varying confining stress (σc) and pore pressures (Pp). The obtained results demonstrate that the permeabilities of the two core plugs decrease with increasing σc or decreasing Pp. The effective stress coefficient for the permeability (αk) values are more than 1.0 for both sandstone core plugs indicating higher sensitivity of the permeability with respect to the applied Pp compared to the applied σc. The previously presented models for calculating αk, such as the Clay Free, Clay Shell, and Clay Particle models, are discussed and a new modified Clay Shell model considering spherical geometry is presented to account for the considerable contrast between the elastic moduli of quartz and clay minerals. The discussed models strongly depend on the magnitude of the considered elastic moduli for the clay minerals. While the Clay Shell and Clay Particle models are capable of describing the observed αk values by considering extremely low elastic moduli for clays, the new modified Clay Shell model is capable of predicting αk values by considering moderate to low values of elastic moduli of clays. The increasing trend of αk values by increasing the σc is discussed and a new correlation based on the observed k values for calculation of αk is presented. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Javad Naseryan Moghadam & Nazmul Haque Mondol & Per Aagaard & Helge Hellevang, 2016. "Effective stress law for the permeability of clay‐bearing sandstones by the Modified Clay Shell model," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 752-774, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:6:p:752-774
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1612
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Streit, Jürgen E & Hillis, Richard R, 2004. "Estimating fault stability and sustainable fluid pressures for underground storage of CO2 in porous rock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1445-1456.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torben Treffeisen & Andreas Henk, 2020. "Faults as Volumetric Weak Zones in Reservoir-Scale Hydro-Mechanical Finite Element Models—A Comparison Based on Grid Geometry, Mesh Resolution and Fault Dip," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Sean P. Rigby & Ali Alsayah & Richard Seely, 2022. "Impact of Exposure to Supercritical Carbon Dioxide on Reservoir Caprocks and Inter-Layers during Sequestration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Wang, Jinkai & Feng, Xiaoyong & Wanyan, Qiqi & Zhao, Kai & Wang, Ziji & Pei, Gen & Xie, Jun & Tian, Bo, 2022. "Hysteresis effect of three-phase fluids in the high-intensity injection–production process of sandstone underground gas storages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Bing Bai & Xiaochun Li & Haiqing Wu & Yongsheng Wang & Mingze Liu, 2017. "A methodology for designing maximum allowable wellhead pressure for CO 2 injection: application to the Shenhua CCS demonstration project, China," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 158-181, February.
    5. Víctor Vilarrasa & Jonny Rutqvist & Antonio Pio Rinaldi, 2015. "Thermal and capillary effects on the caprock mechanical stability at In Salah, Algeria," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 449-461, August.
    6. Md Jamilur Rahman & Manzar Fawad & Nazmul Haque Mondol, 2022. "3D Field-Scale Geomechanical Modeling of Potential CO 2 Storage Site Smeaheia, Offshore Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Mingze Liu & Bing Bai & Xiaochun Li & Shuai Gao & Shaobin Hu & Lei Wang & Haiqing Wu, 2016. "Assessing the applicability of unsaturated effective stress models to tensile fracturing of sandstone in CO 2 ‐water two‐phase fluids," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 670-681, October.
    8. Sikandar Khan & Yehia Abel Khulief & Abdullatif Al-Shuhail, 2019. "Mitigating climate change via CO2 sequestration into Biyadh reservoir: geomechanical modeling and caprock integrity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 23-52, January.
    9. Ba Nghiep Nguyen & Zhangshuan Hou & Diana H. Bacon & Mark D. White, 2017. "A multiscale hydro‐geochemical‐mechanical approach to analyze faulted CO 2 reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 106-127, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:6:y:2016:i:6:p:752-774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.