IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/finmar/v31y2022i1p3-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First‐mover disadvantage: the sovereign ratings mousetrap

Author

Listed:
  • Patrycja Klusak
  • Moritz Kraemer
  • Huong Vu

Abstract

Using 102 sovereigns rated by the three largest credit rating agencies (CRA), S&P, Moody's and Fitch between January 2000 and January 2019, we document that the first‐mover CRA (S&P) in downgrades falls into a commercial trap. Namely, each sovereign downgrade by one notch by the first‐mover CRA (S&P) results in 2.4% increase in the probability of a rating contract being cancelled by the sovereign client. The more downgrades S&P makes in a given month, the more their sovereign rating coverage falls relative to its rivals. Our results are more pronounced for downgrades on small sovereign borrowers than on large sovereign borrowers. This paper explores the interaction between three themes of the literature: herding behaviour amongst CRAs, issues of conflict of interest and ratings quality. Our empirical evidence gives credence to, and underscores the need for sovereign ratings to be made in an impartial way and independent of their commercial ramifications elsewhere in the CRA.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrycja Klusak & Moritz Kraemer & Huong Vu, 2022. "First‐mover disadvantage: the sovereign ratings mousetrap," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 3-44, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:3-44
    DOI: 10.1111/fmii.12155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12155
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fmii.12155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:3-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.