IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v33y2022i2ne2709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the mesoscale structure of a bipartite ecological interaction network on its robustness through a probabilistic modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Saint‐Clair Chabert‐Liddell
  • Pierre Barbillon
  • Sophie Donnet

Abstract

The robustness of an ecological network quantifies the resilience of the ecosystem it represents to species loss. It corresponds to the proportion of species that are disconnected from the rest of the network when extinctions occur sequentially. Classically, the robustness is calculated for a given network, from the simulation of a large number of extinction sequences. The link between network structure and robustness remains an open question. Setting a joint probabilistic model on the network and the extinction sequences allows analysis of this relation. Bipartite stochastic block models have proven their ability to model bipartite networks for example, plant‐pollinator networks: species are divided into blocks and interaction probabilities are determined by the blocks of membership. Analytical expressions of the expectation and variance of robustness are obtained under this model, for different distributions of primary extinction sequences. The impact of the network structure on the robustness is analyzed through a set of properties and numerical illustrations. The analysis of a collection of bipartite ecological networks allows us to compare the empirical approach to our probabilistic approach, and illustrates the relevance of the latter when it comes to computing the robustness of a partially observed or incompletely sampled network.

Suggested Citation

  • Saint‐Clair Chabert‐Liddell & Pierre Barbillon & Sophie Donnet, 2022. "Impact of the mesoscale structure of a bipartite ecological interaction network on its robustness through a probabilistic modeling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:33:y:2022:i:2:n:e2709
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Sebastian Mariani & Zhuo-Ming Ren & Jordi Bascompte & Claudio Juan Tessone, 2019. "Nestedness in complex networks: Observation, emergence, and implications," Papers 1905.07593, arXiv.org.
    2. Nowicki K. & Snijders T. A. B., 2001. "Estimation and Prediction for Stochastic Blockstructures," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1077-1087, September.
    3. Timothée Tabouy & Pierre Barbillon & Julien Chiquet, 2020. "Variational Inference for Stochastic Block Models From Sampled Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 455-466, January.
    4. Catherine Matias & Vincent Miele, 2017. "Statistical clustering of temporal networks through a dynamic stochastic block model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1119-1141, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Guo & Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Yubo Tao, 2024. "A Time-Varying Network for Cryptocurrencies," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 437-456, April.
    2. Dragana M. Pavlović & Bryan R.L. Guillaume & Soroosh Afyouni & Thomas E. Nichols, 2020. "Multi‐subject stochastic blockmodels with mixed effects for adaptive analysis of individual differences in human brain network cluster structure," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 363-396, August.
    3. Marino, Maria Francesca & Pandolfi, Silvia, 2022. "Hybrid maximum likelihood inference for stochastic block models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Hledik, Juraj & Rastelli, Riccardo, 2020. "A dynamic network model to measure exposure diversification in the Austrian interbank market," ESRB Working Paper Series 109, European Systemic Risk Board.
    5. Juraj Hledik & Riccardo Rastelli, 2018. "A dynamic network model to measure exposure diversification in the Austrian interbank market," Papers 1804.01367, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    6. Falk Bräuning & Siem Jan Koopman, 2016. "The dynamic factor network model with an application to global credit risk," Working Papers 16-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    7. Leto Peel & Tiago P. Peixoto & Manlio De Domenico, 2022. "Statistical inference links data and theory in network science," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Jiang, Binyan & Li, Jialiang & Yao, Qiwei, 2023. "Autoregressive networks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119983, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Tom Britton, 2020. "Epidemic models on social networks—With inference," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 222-241, August.
    10. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    11. Thorben Funke & Till Becker, 2019. "Stochastic block models: A comparison of variants and inference methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-40, April.
    12. Ludkin, Matthew, 2020. "Inference for a generalised stochastic block model with unknown number of blocks and non-conjugate edge models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    13. Xiu Xu & Weining Wang & Yongcheol Shin & Chaowen Zheng, 2024. "Dynamic Network Quantile Regression Model," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 407-421, April.
    14. Jun Liu & Jiangzhou Wang & Binghui Liu, 2020. "Community Detection of Multi-Layer Attributed Networks via Penalized Alternating Factorization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Xu, Xiu & Wang, Weining & Shin, Yongcheol, 2020. "Dynamic Spatial Network Quantile Autoregression," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2020-024, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    16. Arora, Saurabh & Sanditov, Bulat, 2009. "Caste as Community? Networks of social affinity in a South Indian village," MERIT Working Papers 2009-037, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Zhiwei Yang & Weigang Wu & Yishun Chen & Xiaola Lin & Jiannong Cao, 2018. "(Q, S)-distance model and counting algorithms in dynamic distributed systems," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(1), pages 15501477187, January.
    18. Tacchella, Andrea & Zaccaria, Andrea & Miccheli, Marco & Pietronero, Luciano, 2023. "Relatedness in the era of machine learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Fessina, Massimiliano & Zaccaria, Andrea & Cimini, Giulio & Squartini, Tiziano, 2024. "Pattern-detection in the global automotive industry: A manufacturer-supplier-product network analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    20. Irene Crimaldi & Michela Del Vicario & Greg Morrison & Walter Quattrociocchi & Massimo Riccaboni, 2015. "Homophily and Triadic Closure in Evolving Social Networks," Working Papers 3/2015, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised May 2015.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:33:y:2022:i:2:n:e2709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.