IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v31y2024i5p4995-5011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do socially responsible indices outperform conventional indices? Evidence from before and after the onset of Covid‐19

Author

Listed:
  • Renu Jonwall
  • Seema Gupta
  • Shuchi Pahuja

Abstract

According to traditional portfolio theories constraints, restrictions, and screens applied in portfolio selection reduces the diversification opportunities which can impact financial performance. Is this true in the case of socially responsible investment (SRI)? To answer this, present study analyzes the performance of Socially Responsible (SR) indices in comparison to conventional indices in an emerging economy. The uniqueness of the study is that it analyses the performance of Shariah, ESG, and thematic indices in a single study. Further, the study measures the impact of Covid‐19 on them. Comparative performance evaluation was conducted by using absolute return analysis and risk‐adjusted measures namely, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, tracking error, information ratio, capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Fama–French three‐factor, and Carhart's four‐factor models. The Structural break was identified, hence analysis was conducted for the total period (January 2017–March 2023) and two sub‐periods, that is, pre and post‐Covid‐19 period. No significant difference was found between the returns of SR indices and conventional indices as against the benchmark index on the basis of absolute return analysis. Sharpe ratio and Treynor ratio both were having negative values for all the SR and conventional indices. Tracking error for all the SR and Conventional indices were very low. The CAPM and both multi‐factor models univocally pointed toward the underperformance of all the SR (except S&P BSE 100 ESG index which had equal performance) and both conventional indices against the benchmark index. Noteworthy point is that only Shariah indices gave the highest returns during post‐Covid period. This research will help in deepening the SRI in the capital market. Companies should increase their ESG scores and make efforts to be listed on the SR indices. Policymakers should announce some kind of rebates, or recognition for star‐performing companies in the field of sustainability to encourage other companies to adopt SR practices in their business operations. The novelty of the current study is that it adds to the socially responsible literature by analyzing the performance of Shariah, ESG, and Thematic indices and conventional indices in a single study in the fastest‐growing economy of India and analyses the impact of Covid‐19 on this performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Renu Jonwall & Seema Gupta & Shuchi Pahuja, 2024. "Do socially responsible indices outperform conventional indices? Evidence from before and after the onset of Covid‐19," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4995-5011, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4995-5011
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2839
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2839?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4995-5011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.