IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v74y2018i3p87-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Amel-Zadeh
  • George Serafeim

Abstract

Using survey data from mainstream investment organizations, we provide insights into why and how investors use reported environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information. Relevance to investment performance is the most frequent motivation, followed by client demand, product strategy, and then, ethical considerations. An important impediment to the use of ESG information is the lack of reporting standards. Among the various ESG investment styles, negative screening is perceived to be the least beneficial to investments and is driven by product and ethical considerations. Full integration and engagement are considered more beneficial and are driven by relevance to investment performance.A practitioner's perspective on this article is provided in the In Practice piece "ESG Investing Moves to the Mainstream" by Keyur Patel, online 18 June 2018. Disclosure: Professor Serafeim serves on the advisory board of investment organizations that practice various environmental, social, and governance styles. Professor Amel-Zadeh received a research grant from Bank of New York Mellon supporting this research. He also received speaker honoraria from the same organization. Editor’s Note Submitted 19 October 2017 Accepted 23 February 2018 by Stephen J. Brown This article was externally reviewed using our double-blind peer-review process. When the article was accepted for publication, the authors thanked the reviewers in the acknowledgments. John Christopher Hughen, CFA, CIPM, was one of the reviewers for this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:74:y:2018:i:3:p:87-103
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruixin Su & Na Li, 2024. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance, Platform Governance, and Value Creation of Platform Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Liu, Jianxiang & Yi, Wenyu & Lin, Yajia, 2024. "How does the social responsibility preference of funds affect stock price synchronicity?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Milagros Vivel-Búa & Rubén Lado-Sestayo & Andrea Martínez-Salgueiro & Mariana Díaz-Ballesteros, 2024. "Environmental, social, and governance perfomance and default risk in the eurozone," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2953-2980, October.
    4. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    5. Renu Jonwall & Seema Gupta & Shuchi Pahuja, 2024. "Do socially responsible indices outperform conventional indices? Evidence from before and after the onset of Covid‐19," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4995-5011, September.
    6. Danni Yu & Tiantian Meng & Minyu Zheng & Rongyi Ma, 2024. "ESG uncertainty, investor attention and stock price crash risk in China: evidence from PVAR model analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Xue, Qinyuan & Jin, Yifei & Zhang, Cheng, 2024. "ESG rating results and corporate total factor productivity," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    8. Laura Trueba‐Castañeda & Francisco M. Somohano‐Rodríguez & Begoña Torre‐Olmo, 2024. "Does digitalisation enable small and medium‐sized enterprises to become more sustainable?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4893-4909, September.
    9. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    11. Migliavacca, Alessandro, 2024. "Value relevance of accounting numbers and sustainability information in Europe: Empirical evidence from nonfinancial companies," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Wei Cai & Yue Chen & Shiva Rajgopal & Li Azinovic-Yang, 2024. "Diversity targets," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2157-2208, September.
    13. DeLisle, R. Jared & Grant, Andrew & Mao, Ruiqi, 2024. "Does environmental and social performance affect pricing efficiency? Evidence from earnings conference call tones," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Jae Wook Yoo & Yu Jin Chang, 2024. "Domestic vs. Foreign Institutional Investors: Who Improves ESG and Value of Chinese Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Ali Raza Elahi & Anum Iqbal & Bilal Ahmad Minhas & Fouzia Ashfaq, 2023. "The Behavior Risk Biases And Sustainable Investment Decision," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 74-88.
    16. Koundouri, Phoebe & Pittis, Nikitas & Plataniotis, Angelos, 2022. "The Impact of ESG performance on the Financial Performance of European Area Companies: An empirical examination," MPRA Paper 122273, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Martinez Meyers, Susana & Ferrero-Ferrero, Idoya & Muñoz-Torres, María Jesus, 2024. "ARE sustainable funds doing the talk and the walk? An ESG score analysis of fund portfolio holdings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1526-1541.
    18. Tristan Jourde & Arthur Stalla-Bourdillon, 2024. "PEnvironmental Preferences and Sector Valuations," Working papers 964, Banque de France.
    19. Yang, Yuan & Wang, Baomin & Su, Xingyu, 2024. "Judicial quality and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Deng, Jing & Liu, Yejiao & Zhuang, Zhitao & Gu, Xuesong & Xing, Xiaoyun, 2024. "Do China and USA differ in the interrelationship between green bond and ESG markets?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 919-934.
    21. Evangelos Chytis & Nikolaos Eriotis & Maria Mitroulia, 2024. "ESG in Business Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:74:y:2018:i:3:p:87-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.