IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v30y2023i4p2037-2052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industry CSR reports

Author

Listed:
  • Siying Cai
  • Wenzhong Zhu
  • Yuting Wang

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a concept, where organizations can store and maintain environmental, economic and social issues by including social or environmental concerns. This research intends to map out the features of evaluative language used by pharmaceutical industry CSR reports and figure out how evaluative meaning assists companies in communicating with stakeholders and narrowing the legitimacy gap, to be in a status congruent with societal expectation. An integrated analytical framework and the Three‐Domain Model of CSR is created to fulfill the research objectives. This study primarily examines the characteristics of evaluative language with the use of two sets of self‐built corpora that include CSR reports from pharmaceutical companies that must maintain and repair their legitimacy; the study reveals that report authors usually use more resources with a positive attitude to evaluate themselves whereas negative resources are only adopted to characterize others. Statistics demonstrate a considerable difference in the utilization of affect resources, although CSR reports in both organizations embrace appreciation resources as the primary means of maintaining or repairing their legitimacy. Finally, by borrowing the Three‐Domain Model of CSR, the results also show “ethical” responsibility as the focused area in pharmaceutical industry CSR reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Siying Cai & Wenzhong Zhu & Yuting Wang, 2023. "Corpus analysis of evaluative language and framework implementation for pharmaceutical industry CSR reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 2037-2052, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:2037-2052
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2472
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570210435861 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    3. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570310492308 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    5. Schwartz, Mark S. & Carroll, Archie B., 2003. "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 503-530, October.
    6. Lobschat, Lara & Mueller, Benjamin & Eggers, Felix & Brandimarte, Laura & Diefenbach, Sarah & Kroschke, Mirja & Wirtz, Jochen, 2021. "Corporate digital responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 875-888.
    7. David Campbell & Barrie Craven & Philip Shrives, 2003. "Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: a comment on perception and legitimacy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 558-581, October.
    8. Craig Deegan & Michaela Rankin & John Tobin, 2002. "An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 312-343, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonsón, Enrique & Bednárová, Michaela & Perea, David, 2023. "Disclosures about algorithmic decision making in the corporate reports of Western European companies," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    2. Meyer, Margit & Waßmann, Jan, 2011. "Strategische Corporate Social Responsibility. Konzeptionelle Entwicklung und Implementierung in der Praxis am Beispiel 'dm-drogerie markt'," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 3/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.
    3. Jared Peifer, 2014. "Fund Loyalty Among Socially Responsible Investors: The Importance of the Economic and Ethical Domains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 635-649, June.
    4. Nir Halevy & Sora Jun & Eileen Y. Chou, 2020. "Intergroup Conflict is Our Business: CEOs’ Ethical Intergroup Leadership Fuels Stakeholder Support for Corporate Intergroup Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 229-246, February.
    5. Monica Thiel, 2010. "Innovations in Corporate Social Responsibility from Global Business Leaders at Panasonic, Thomson Reuters and Nanyang Business School," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(2), pages 194-200, September.
    6. Ruth Alas & Külliki Tafel, 2008. "Conceptualizing the Dynamics of Social Responsibility: Evidence from a Case Study of Estonia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 371-385, August.
    7. Rabin Ibnu Zainal, 2019. "Analysis of CSR Legislation in Indonesia: Mandate to Business," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 165-181, September.
    8. Christina Deselaers & Alina Dahmen & Sonia Lippke, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on CSR Activities of Healthcare Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Dominik Aaken & Florian Buchner, 2020. "Religion and CSR: a systematic literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 917-945, June.
    10. RAMLUGUN Vidisha Gunesh & RABOUTE Wendy Geraldine, 2015. "Do Csr Practices Of Banks In Mauritius Lead To Satisfaction And Loyalty?," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 128-144, August.
    11. Juan Carlos Fandos-Roig & Javier Sánchez-García & Sandra Tena-Monferrer & Luis José Callarisa-Fiol, 2020. "Does CSR Help to Retain Customers in a Service Company?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Francisco González Santa Cruz & Iliana Loor Alcívar & Nelly Moreira Mero & Amalia Hidalgo-Fernández, 2020. "Analysis of the Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Study Applied to Co-operativism in Ecuador," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 517-534, April.
    13. Zhongtian Li & Jing Jia & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2022. "The corporate sustainability committee and its relation to corporate environmental performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 1292-1324, July.
    14. Francesco Gangi & Jérôme Méric & Rémi Jardat & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2019. "Business for society," Post-Print hal-02382307, HAL.
    15. Tea Golja, 2012. "New Challenges in Corporate Governance: Linking M&A and Social Responsibility," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(7), pages 379-390.
    16. Bodo B. Schlegelmilch & Ilona Szőcs, 2015. "Corporate philanthropy and ethicality: two opposing notions?," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 16, pages 317-353, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. David Sigurthorsson, 2012. "The Icelandic Banking Crisis: A Reason to Rethink CSR?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 147-156, December.
    18. Wang, Sen, 2019. "Managing forests for the greater good: The role of the social license to operate," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Melsa Ararat & Asli M. Colpan & Dirk Matten, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Responsibility for the Public Good," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 911-929, December.
    20. Thomas Beschorner & Thomas Hajduk & Christoph Schank, 2015. "Corporate social responsibility: individual, institutional and systemic perspectives," Chapters, in: Handbook on Ethics and Marketing, chapter 13, pages 263-283, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:2037-2052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.