IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v16y2009i3p155-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The achievability of sustainable reporting practices in agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Belinda R. Williams
  • Trevor Wilmshurst

Abstract

This research investigates the process of change in moving from a domestic accounting standard, AASB 1037, relating to self‐generating and regenerating assets (SGARAs) to an international standard, AASB 141. It focuses on the achievement (or nonachievement as it may be) of sustainable reporting practices for these agricultural assets. This paper finds that the transition to AASB 141 has allowed firms the discretion to change how they value their agricultural assets in comparison to the domestic standard. Consistency may have been achieved to a limited extent with the introduction of this financial accounting standard but comparability appears not to have been. Further, there is very limited understanding of the reporting of these assets from a user's perspective. It is concluded that this lack of consistency, comparability and understandability will not help achieve sustainability in the reporting practices of agricultural assets. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Belinda R. Williams & Trevor Wilmshurst, 2009. "The achievability of sustainable reporting practices in agriculture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 155-166, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:16:y:2009:i:3:p:155-166
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.190
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Booth & R. G. Walker, 2003. "Valuation of SGARAs IN THE Wine Industry: Time for Sober Reflection," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(31), pages 52-60, November.
    2. K.F Herbohn & J.L Herbohn, 1999. "Accounting for Forests in Social, Economic and Political Contexts," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 408-440, December.
    3. Kathleen Herbohn, 2006. "Accounting for SGARAs: A Stocktake of Accounting Practice Before Compliance With AASB 141 Agriculture," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 62-76, July.
    4. Kathleen F. Herbohn & Ronald Peterson & John L. Herbohn, 1998. "Accounting for Forestry Assets: Current Practice and future Directions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 8(15), pages 54-66, May.
    5. Carlin Dowling & Professor.Jayne Godfrey, 2001. "AASB 1037 Sows the Seeds of Change: A Survey of SGARA Measurement Methods," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 45-51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo Luiz Menezes da Silva & Paula Carolina Ciampaglia Nardi & Maisa de Souza Ribeiro, 2015. "Earnings Management and Valuation of Biological Assets," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belinda Williams & Trevor Wilmshurst, 2009. "Accounting for SGARAs: Towards Comparability and Consistency," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(2), pages 117-127, June.
    2. Kathleen Herbohn, 2006. "Accounting for SGARAs: A Stocktake of Accounting Practice Before Compliance With AASB 141 Agriculture," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 62-76, July.
    3. Hana BOHUSOVA & Patrik SVOBODA, 2017. "Will the amendments to the IAS 16 and IAS 41 influence the value of biological assets?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 53-64.
    4. Patrik Svoboda & Hana Bohušová, 2017. "Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41: Are There Any Differences between Plant and Animal from a Financial Reporting Point of View?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 327-337.
    5. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    6. Carlin Dowling & Professor.Jayne Godfrey, 2001. "AASB 1037 Sows the Seeds of Change: A Survey of SGARA Measurement Methods," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 45-51, March.
    7. Hana Bohušová & Patrik Svoboda, 2011. "What does the implementation of IFRS for SMEs bring for agricultural enterprises?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 81-90.
    8. Argilés bosch, Josep M.a & Aliberch, Anna Sabata & Blandón, Josep García, 2012. "A Comparative Study of Difficulties in Accounting Preparation and Judgement in Agriculture Using Fair Value and Historical Cost for Biological Assets Valuation," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 109-142.
    9. Herbohn, Kathleen, 2005. "A full cost environmental accounting experiment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 519-536, August.
    10. Ricardo Luiz Menezes da Silva & Paula Carolina Ciampaglia Nardi & Maisa de Souza Ribeiro, 2015. "Earnings Management and Valuation of Biological Assets," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Malgorzata Wegrzynska & Alina Nowotarska, 2021. "Measuring and Valuation of Biological Assets: A Research Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 331-345.
    12. Hana BOHUŠOVÁ & Patrik SVOBODA & Danuše NERUDOVÁ, 2012. "Biological assets reporting: Is the increase in value caused by the biological transformation revenue?," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(11), pages 520-532.
    13. Josep Ma. Argiles (UB) & Josep Garcia Bladon (IQS) & Teresa Monllau (UPF), 2009. "Fair value versus historic cost Valuation for Biological assets: Implications for the quality of financial information," Working Papers in Economics 215, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    14. Liyu He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2021. "The impact of managerial discretion on fair value information in the Australian agricultural sector," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1897-1930, April.
    15. Arimany, N. & Farreras, M.A. & Rabaseda, J., 2013. "Alejados de la NIC 41: ¿Es correcta la valoración del patrimonio neto de las empresas agrarias?," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(01).
    16. Saverio BOZZOLAN & Enrico LAGHI & Marco MATTEI, 2016. "Amendments to the IAS 41 and IAS 16 - implications for accounting of bearer plants," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 160-166.
    17. David Procházka, 2011. "The Role of Fair Value Measurement in the Recent Financial Crunch," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(1), pages 71-88.
    18. Bamber, Matthew & McMeeking, Kevin, 2016. "An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 59-73.
    19. Charles Elad, 2004. "Fair value accounting in the agricultural sector: some implications for international accounting harmonization," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 621-641.
    20. Rute Gonçalves & Patrícia Lopes, 2015. "Accounting in Agriculture: Measurement practices of listed firms," FEP Working Papers 557, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:16:y:2009:i:3:p:155-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.