IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v16y2009i1p27-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing stakeholders or the environment? The challenge of relating indicators in practice

Author

Listed:
  • Birgit Brunklaus
  • Tove Malmqvist
  • Henrikke Baumann

Abstract

Many organizations present their environmental work in the form of annual reports and use the indicators in them for follow‐up. However, internal communication and management is needed for environmental improvements. The indicators found in reports may be suitable for external communication, but are they also suitable internally and operationally? This article reviews the existing literature on environmental indicators. With the help of an operational approach, from organisation theory, and a life‐cycle approach, indicators are analysed. The analysis shows that formulating indicators for internal management is not an easy task; available guidelines are of little help. It is concluded that the environment can be managed internally by relating indicators. Therefore, an additional set of indicators for internal management and a wider responsibility for the life cycle are recommended. The analysis and recommendations are illustrated with examples drawn from the field of property management. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Birgit Brunklaus & Tove Malmqvist & Henrikke Baumann, 2009. "Managing stakeholders or the environment? The challenge of relating indicators in practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 27-37, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:16:y:2009:i:1:p:27-37
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.180
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Azzone & Giuliano Noci & Raffaella Manzini & Richard Welford & C. William Young, 1996. "Defining Environmental Performance Indicators: An Integrated Framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 69-80, June.
    2. Eva Heiskanen, 2000. "Managers' interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 239-254, July.
    3. J. Emil Morhardt & Sarah Baird & Kelly Freeman, 2002. "Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 215-233, December.
    4. Daniel Tyteca & Jérôme Carlens & Frans Berkhout & Julia Hertin & Walter Wehrmeyer & Marcus Wagner, 2002. "Corporate environmental performance evaluation: evidence from the MEPI project," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Tine Herreborg Jørgensen & Gorm Simonsen, 2002. "Prospects of a unified management system," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 91-98, June.
    6. Elisabeth Schylander & André Martinuzzi, 2007. "ISO 14001 – experiences, effects and future challenges: a national study in Austria," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 133-147, February.
    7. Ans Kolk & Anniek Mauser, 2002. "The evolution of environmental management: from stage models to performance evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 14-31, January.
    8. Shuangyu Xie & Kohji Hayase, 2007. "Corporate environmental performance evaluation: a measurement model and a new concept," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 148-168, February.
    9. Alexander Dahlsrud, 2008. "How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Stanislav Karapetrovic, 2002. "On the concept of a universal audit of quality and environmental management systems," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 147-156, September.
    11. Power, Michael, 1999. "The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198296034.
    12. Elaine Lawrence & Duncan Andrews & Brian Ralph & Chris France, 2002. "Applying organizational environmental tools and techniques," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 116-125, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hinrika Droege & Andrea Raggi & Tomás B. Ramos, 2021. "Co‐development of a framework for circular economy assessment in organisations: Learnings from the public sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1715-1729, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asit Bhattacharyya & Lorne Cummings, 2015. "Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance – Stakeholder Engagement Evaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 309-325, July.
    2. Ivana First & Deepali Sinha Khetriwal, 2010. "Exploring the relationship between environmental orientation and brand value: is there fire or only smoke?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 90-103, February.
    3. Christoph Trumpp & Thomas Guenther, 2017. "Too Little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 49-68, January.
    4. C. Trumpp & J. Endrikat & C. Zopf & E. Guenther, 2015. "Definition, Conceptualization, and Measurement of Corporate Environmental Performance: A Critical Examination of a Multidimensional Construct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(2), pages 185-204, January.
    5. Claudia Poser & Edeltraud Guenther & Marc Orlitzky, 2012. "Shades of green: using computer-aided qualitative data analysis to explore different aspects of corporate environmental performance," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 413-450, January.
    6. Shuangyu Xie & Kohji Hayase, 2007. "Corporate environmental performance evaluation: a measurement model and a new concept," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 148-168, February.
    7. J. Emil Morhardt, 2010. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(7), pages 436-452, November.
    8. Rüdiger Hahn, 2013. "ISO 26000 and the Standardization of Strategic Management Processes for Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(7), pages 442-455, November.
    9. Matthias S. Fifka & Nicola Berg, 2014. "Managing Corporate Social Responsibility For The Sake Of Business And Society," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 253-257, September.
    10. Stefano Garzella & Raffaele Fiorentino, 2013. "How to control environmental strategy?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 45-76.
    11. Markus Milne & Rob Gray, 2013. "W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 13-29, November.
    12. Amir Michael & Rob Dixon, 2019. "Audit data analytics of unregulated voluntary disclosures and auditing expectations gap," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 188-205, December.
    13. Paolo Esposito & Paolo Ricci, 2021. "Cultural organizations, digital Corporate Social Responsibility and stakeholder engagement in virtual museums: a multiple case study. How digitization is influencing the attitude toward CSR," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 953-964, March.
    14. Ketty Kortelainen, 2008. "Global supply chains and social requirements: case studies of labour condition auditing in the People's Republic of China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(7), pages 431-443, November.
    15. Peter Dobers, 2009. "Corporate social responsibility: management and methods," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 185-191, July.
    16. Thomas Koellner & Olaf Weber & Marcus Fenchel & Roland Scholz, 2005. "Principles for sustainability rating of investment funds," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 54-70, January.
    17. Elena Escrig‐Olmedo & María Jesús Muñoz‐Torres & María Ángeles Fernández‐Izquierdo & Juana María Rivera‐Lirio, 2017. "Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 142-162, February.
    18. Runa Sarkar, 2008. "Public policy and corporate environmental behaviour: a broader view," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 281-297, September.
    19. Elisabeth Albertini, 2017. "What We Know About The Environmental Policy: An Inductive Typology Of The Research," Post-Print hal-02148591, HAL.
    20. Harry Bremmers & Onno Omta & Ron Kemp & Derk‐Jan Haverkamp, 2007. "Do stakeholder groups influence environmental management system development in the Dutch agri‐food sector?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 214-231, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:16:y:2009:i:1:p:27-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.