IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v9y2002i3p147-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the concept of a universal audit of quality and environmental management systems

Author

Listed:
  • Stanislav Karapetrovic

Abstract

There is a definite trend in industry today toward the integration of internal management systems (MSs), including those for managing quality, environment, health and safety, and social accountability. The standards describing the minimum requirements for such systems have been made largely compatible, but are not yet fully aligned or integrated. Apart from several national standards for integrated quality, environment and safety MSs, the world has yet to see a corresponding and internationally accepted guideline. In contrast, integrative standardization activities in the realm of MS auditing are proceeding in full force, with the introduction of the pioneering ISO 19011 guideline for quality and environmental auditing expected soon. This paper focuses on the concepts, principles and practices of a truly generic audit, applicable for the evaluation of diverse aspects of organizational performance against the criteria stated in MS standards. A universal audit model based on the systems approach and several important questions regarding the compatibility and integration of the current auditing schemes are discussed. These issues include the ability of integrated audits to foster unification of supported MSs, as well as different strategies for the development of a universal audit guideline (UAG) and integration of function‐specific audits. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Stanislav Karapetrovic, 2002. "On the concept of a universal audit of quality and environmental management systems," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 147-156, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:9:y:2002:i:3:p:147-156
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.16
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.16?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Birgit Brunklaus & Tove Malmqvist & Henrikke Baumann, 2009. "Managing stakeholders or the environment? The challenge of relating indicators in practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 27-37, January.
    2. Michaela Balzarova & Pavel Castka, 2018. "Social responsibility: Experts’ viewpoints on adoption of the ISO 26000 standard," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 819-824, September.
    3. Amir Michael & Rob Dixon, 2019. "Audit data analytics of unregulated voluntary disclosures and auditing expectations gap," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 188-205, December.
    4. Ulrike Gelbmann, 2010. "Establishing strategic CSR in SMEs: an Austrian CSR quality seal to substantiate the strategic CSR performance," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 90-98.
    5. Llorenç Bagur & Jordi Perramon & Oriol Amat, 2013. "Impact of quality and environmental investment on business competitiveness and profitability: The case of travel agencies," Economics Working Papers 1376, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. Elisabeth Schylander & André Martinuzzi, 2007. "ISO 14001 – experiences, effects and future challenges: a national study in Austria," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 133-147, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:9:y:2002:i:3:p:147-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.