IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v40y2024i4p885-907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of pet‐food customer postpurchase experience using online customer reviews: Implications for product and marketing strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Lonnie Hobbs
  • Aleksan Shanoyan
  • Zelia Z. Wiley
  • Greg Aldrich

Abstract

Pet‐food industry growth and demand for specialized product offerings have generated new opportunities for companies to enhance their competitiveness and profitability through effective product differentiation. Recent rise in e‐commerce and technological advancements for capturing and analyzing online customer review data provide new opportunities for large‐scale assessment of customer perceptions of product attributes. This paper presents an integrated qualitative and quantitative approach for utilizing online customer review data to generate insights for informing pet‐food industry product and marketing decisions. The results from the analysis of 5632 online reviews of two pet‐food products highlight (i) product attributes that effectively differentiate (or put on par) two competing pet‐food products, (ii) identify product attributes that are most important for customer postpurchase experience, and (iii) estimate the effect of specific attributes on customers' positive (or negative) postpurchase experience. Specific pet‐food attributes examined include packaging, health/benefit, ingredient, taste, smell, appearance/form, natural/organic, processing, sourcing, small/large breed, price, and service. The advantages of this approach include its ability to leverage large amounts of easily accessible data and its generalizability to the analysis of other consumer goods that have significant online sales and customer review data [EconLit Citations: Q13, M31].

Suggested Citation

  • Lonnie Hobbs & Aleksan Shanoyan & Zelia Z. Wiley & Greg Aldrich, 2024. "Analysis of pet‐food customer postpurchase experience using online customer reviews: Implications for product and marketing strategies," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 885-907, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:4:p:885-907
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.21866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21866
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.21866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Liangyan Wang & Yitong Wang, 2010. "Product Quality Risk Perceptions and Decisions: Contaminated Pet Food and Lead‐Painted Toys," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(10), pages 1572-1589, October.
    2. Matthew A. Barlow & J. Cameron Verhaal & Ryan W. Angus, 2019. "Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1219-1242, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vossen, Alexander & Ihl, Christoph, 2020. "More than words! How narrative anchoring and enrichment help to balance differentiation and conformity of entrepreneurial products," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    2. Liu, Yihui & Wu, Aiqi & Song, Di, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Cross-side Network Interaction on Digital Platforms on Internationalization of Manufacturing Firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    3. Fan, Terence & Schwab, Andreas & Geng, Xuesong, 2021. "Habitual entrepreneurship in digital platform ecosystems: A time-contingent model of learning from prior software project experiences," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    4. Inoue, Yuki, 2021. "Indirect innovation management by platform ecosystem governance and positioning: Toward collective ambidexterity in the ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Joey van Angeren & Govert Vroom & Brian T. McCann & Ksenia Podoynitsyna & Fred Langerak, 2022. "Optimal distinctiveness across revenue models: Performance effects of differentiation of paid and free products in a mobile app market," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(10), pages 2066-2100, October.
    6. Marie Madeleine Meurer & Maksim Belitski & Christian Fisch & Roy Thurik, 2024. "What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1139-1170, October.
    7. Jiuchang Wei & Ming Zhao & Fei Wang & Peng Cheng & Dingtao Zhao, 2016. "An Empirical Study of the Volkswagen Crisis in China: Customers’ Information Processing and Behavioral Intentions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 114-129, January.
    8. Karl Taeuscher & Eric Yanfei Zhao & Michael Lounsbury, 2022. "Categories and narratives as sources of distinctiveness: Cultural entrepreneurship within and across categories," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(10), pages 2101-2134, October.
    9. Taeuscher, Karl, 2019. "Reputation and new venture performance in online markets: The moderating role of market crowding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(6).
    10. Rodolphe Durand & Marieke Huysentruyt, 2022. "Communication frames and beneficiary engagement in corporate social initiatives: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in France," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1823-1853, September.
    11. Li, Yonghui & Guo, Hai & Wang, Donghan, 2024. "Achieving optimal distinctiveness in incubation markets: Hierarchy of needs perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Xia, Ji & Wang, Jiexiang & Hu, Huaguang & Liu, Shuang, 2024. "Optimal distinctiveness across different benchmarks: Implications for platform complementors to strategically position new products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Shenglei Pi & Kuei-Feng Chang & I-Tung Shih, 2021. "Research on the Performance of Human Capital at Different Organizational Levels of Pharmaceutical Corporations: Moderation of Informal Relational Capital," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Maximilian Julius Krome & Ulrich Pidun, 2023. "Conceptualization of research themes and directions in business ecosystem strategies: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 873-920, June.
    15. Subrahmanyam Aditya Karanam & Ashish Agarwal & Anitesh Barua, 2023. "Design for Social Sharing: The Case of Mobile Apps," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 721-743, June.
    16. Erk P. Piening & Ferdinand Thies & Michael Wessel & Alexander Benlian, 2021. "Searching for Success—Entrepreneurs’ Responses to Crowdfunding Failure," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(3), pages 626-657, May.
    17. Alexiou, Kostas & Wiggins, Jennifer & Fourkan, Md, 2024. "Legitimate incongruity: Strategic positioning within hybrid categories," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4).
    18. Wu, Aiqi & Song, Di & Liu, Yihui, 2022. "Platform synergy and innovation speed of SMEs: The roles of organizational design and regional environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 38-53.
    19. Xuelin Chen & Dongmei Zhou & Ziying Zhan & Ruoyu Lu, 2023. "When Do You Enter? Entrepreneurial Firms’ Entry Timing and Product Performance in the Digital Platform Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Cenamor, Javier, 2021. "Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 335-343.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:40:y:2024:i:4:p:885-907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.