IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v36y2020i2p208-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring dynamic biased technical change in Lithuanian cereal farms

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Baležentis
  • Alfons Oude Lansink

Abstract

Changes in substitutability among inputs and outputs can help farms adapt to economic, technological, or societal changes. However, measurement of technical bias has only been carried out in a static framework, ignoring the confounding effects of technical bias due to adjustment costs. This paper integrates two streams of literature, that is one measuring dynamic inefficiency and the other measuring technical bias, thereby offering non‐parametric measures of technical bias for dynamic production technology. The dynamic framework explains the changes in the extent of output foregone to enable investments. The proposed framework is applied to a panel of data of Lithuanian cereal farms over the period 2004–2014. The results show technical change was, on average, more biased toward increasing output rather than investment. Technical change has been more focused on labor‐usage, relative to land and intermediate consumption in the same period.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Baležentis & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2020. "Measuring dynamic biased technical change in Lithuanian cereal farms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 208-225, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:36:y:2020:i:2:p:208-225
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.21623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21623
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.21623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Briec & Nicolas Peypoch, 2007. "Biased Technical Change and Parallel Neutrality," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 281-292, December.
    2. Stefanou, Spiro E. & Silva, Elvira, 2007. "AJAE Appendix: Dynamic Efficiency Measurement: Theory and Application," American Journal of Agricultural Economics APPENDICES, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(2), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Kapelko, Magdalena & Oude Lansink, Alfons & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2014. "Assessing dynamic inefficiency of the Spanish construction sector pre- and post-financial crisis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 349-357.
    4. Carlos Pestana Barros, 2012. "Productivity Assessment of African Seaports," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 24(1), pages 67-78, March.
    5. Briec, Walter & Peypoch, Nicolas & Ratsimbanierana, Hermann, 2011. "Productivity growth and biased technological change in hydroelectric dams," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 853-858, September.
    6. Rolf Färe & Emili Grifell‐Tatjé & Shawna Grosskopf & C. A. Knox Lovell, 1997. "Biased Technical Change and the Malmquist Productivity Index," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(1), pages 119-127, March.
    7. K. Hervé Dakpo & Yann Desjeux & Philippe Jeanneaux & Laure Latruffe, 2019. "Productivity, technical efficiency and technological change in French agriculture during 2002-2015: a Färe-Primont index decomposition using group frontiers and meta-frontier," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(11), pages 1166-1182, March.
    8. Magdalena Kapelko & Alfons Oude Lansink & Spiro E Stefanou, 2015. "Effect of Food Regulation on the Spanish Food Processing Industry: A Dynamic Productivity Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Tomas Baležentis, 2014. "Total factor productivity in the Lithuanian family farms after accession to the EU: application of the bias-corrected Malmquist indices," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(4), pages 731-746, November.
    10. Barros, Carlos P. & Guironnet, Jean-Pascal & Peypoch, Nicolas, 2011. "Productivity growth and biased technical change in French higher education," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 641-646, January.
    11. Jean Joseph Minviel & Laure Latruffe, 2017. "Effect of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: a meta-analysis of empirical results," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 213-226, January.
    12. Elvira Silva & Spiro E. Stefanou, 2007. "Dynamic Efficiency Measurement: Theory and Application," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(2), pages 398-419.
    13. Silva, Elvira & Lansink, Alfons Oude & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2015. "The adjustment-cost model of the firm: Duality and productive efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 245-256.
    14. Carlos Pestana Barros & Nicolas Peypoch, 2012. "Productivity assessment of African seaports with biased technological change," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 663-675, May.
    15. Kapelko, Magdalena & Oude Lansink, Alfons & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2015. "Analyzing the impact of investment spikes on dynamic productivity growth," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 116-124.
    16. repec:bla:scandj:v:99:y:1997:i:1:p:119-27 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jiro Nemoto & Mika Goto, 2003. "Measurement of Dynamic Efficiency in Production: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Japanese Electric Utilities," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 191-210, April.
    18. Chambers,Robert G., 1988. "Applied Production Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314275, September.
    19. Elvira Silva & Spiro Stefanou, 2003. "Nonparametric Dynamic Production Analysis and the Theory of Cost," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 5-32, January.
    20. Latruffe, Laure & Fogarasi, József & Desjeux, Yann, 2012. "Efficiency, productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 264-278.
    21. Nemoto, Jiro & Goto, Mika, 1999. "Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 51-56, July.
    22. Chambers, Robert G. & Chung, Yangho & Fare, Rolf, 1996. "Benefit and Distance Functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 407-419, August.
    23. Laure Latruffe & Kelvin Balcombe & Sophia Davidova & Katarzyna Zawalinska, 2004. "Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(12), pages 1255-1263.
    24. Lansink, Alfons Oude & Stefanou, Spiro & Serra, Teresa, 2015. "Primal and dual dynamic Luenberger productivity indicators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 555-563.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Kapelko, 2019. "Measuring productivity change accounting for adjustment costs: evidence from the food industry in the European Union," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 215-234, July.
    2. Jean Joseph Minviel & Timo Sipiläinen, 2018. "Dynamic stochastic analysis of the farm subsidy-efficiency link: evidence from France," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 41-54, October.
    3. Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena, 2019. "Accounting for slacks to measure dynamic inefficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 463-471.
    4. Engida, Tadesse Getacher & Rao, Xudong & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2020. "A dynamic by-production framework for analyzing inefficiency associated with corporate social responsibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1170-1179.
    5. Frederic Ang & Pieter Jan Kerstens, 2016. "To Mix or Specialise? A Coordination Productivity Indicator for English and Welsh farms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 779-798, September.
    6. Magdalena Kapelko, 2017. "Dynamic versus static inefficiency assessment of the Polish meat‐processing industry in the aftermath of the European Union integration and financial crisis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 505-521, September.
    7. Tsionas, Mike G. & Malikov, Emir & Kumbhakar, Subal C., 2020. "Endogenous dynamic efficiency in the intertemporal optimization models of firm behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 313-324.
    8. Magdalena Kapelko & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2018. "Managerial and program inefficiency for European meat manufacturing firms: A dynamic multidirectional inefficiency analysis approach," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 25-36, February.
    9. Magdalena Kapelko & Alfons Oude Lansink & Encarna Guillamon‐Saorin, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and dynamic productivity change in the US food and beverage manufacturing industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 286-305, April.
    10. Frederic Ang & Pieter Jan Kerstens, 2023. "Robust nonparametric analysis of dynamic profits, prices and productivity: An application to French meat-processing firms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 771-809.
    11. Tsionas, Mike & Patel, Pankaj C. & Guedes, Maria João, 2022. "Endogenous efficiency of the dynamic profit maximization in the intertemporal production models of venture behavior," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    12. Kapelko, Magdalena & Oude Lansink, Alfons & Stefanou, Spiro E., 2015. "Analyzing the impact of investment spikes on dynamic productivity growth," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 116-124.
    13. Theodoros Skevas & Jasper Grashuis, 2023. "Evaluating dynamic productivity change of US farm supply cooperatives," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1238-1253, October.
    14. Jean Joseph Minviel & Timo Sipiläinen, 2021. "A dynamic stochastic frontier approach with persistent and transient inefficiency and unobserved heterogeneity," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(4), pages 575-589, July.
    15. S. Ghobadi & G. R. Jahanshahloo & F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2018. "Efficiency Measure Under Inter-Temporal Dependence," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 657-675, March.
    16. Maman Setiawan & Nury Effendi & Rina Indiastuti & Mohamad Fahmi & Budiono, 2022. "Innovation and Dynamic Productivity Growth in the Indonesian Food and Beverage Industry," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Aparicio, Juan & Kapelko, Magdalena & Ortiz, Lidia, 2023. "Enhancing the measurement of firm inefficiency accounting for corporate social responsibility: A dynamic data envelopment analysis fuzzy approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 986-997.
    18. Encarna Guillamon-Saorin & Magdalena Kapelko & Spiro E. Stefanou, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Operational Inefficiency: A Dynamic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Magdalena Kapelko & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2020. "Dynamic Cost Inefficiency of the European Union Meat Processing Firms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 760-777, September.
    20. Pierre Ouellette & Valérie Vierstraete, 2010. "Malmquist indexes with quasi-fixed inputs: an application to school districts in Québec," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 57-76, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:36:y:2020:i:2:p:208-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.