IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v30y2014i4p424-437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Farmer Market Power on the Degree of Farm Retail Price Transmission: A Simulation Model with an Application to the Dutch Ware Potato Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Tsion Taye Assefa
  • W. Erno Kuiper
  • Miranda P.M. Meuwissen

Abstract

ABSTRACT A classic oligopoly/oligopsony model is developed to assess the degree of price transmission in a two‐stage farmer–retailer supply chain. A simulation experiment based on data of the Dutch ware potato sector illustrates how price transmission may become imperfect and asymmetric as a consequence of retailer oligopsony power in the sense that farm price decreases are only partially passed on to consumers whereas farm price increases are more than fully transmitted. Oligopoly power by farmers to level their bargaining power vis‐à‐vis the retailers may even make the degree of price transmission worse.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsion Taye Assefa & W. Erno Kuiper & Miranda P.M. Meuwissen, 2014. "The Effect of Farmer Market Power on the Degree of Farm Retail Price Transmission: A Simulation Model with an Application to the Dutch Ware Potato Supply Chain," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 424-437, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:424-437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.21371
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zamora, Ana Paula & Solórzano, Johana & Paniagua, Javier, 2024. "Asymmetric Price Transmission: The Case of Potato and Onion in Costa Rica," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 12(2), April.
    2. Sobczak, Wioleta & Kanetkar, Vinay, 2022. "Price Dependence in the Supply Chain on the Mushroom Market in Canada," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 13(01), January.
    3. Maximilian Koppenberg & Stefan Hirsch, 2022. "Output market power and firm characteristics in dairy processing: Evidence from three EU countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 490-517, June.
    4. Federica Di Marcantonio & Pavel Ciaian & Vicente Castellanos, 2018. "Unfair trading practices in the dairy farm sector: Evidence from selected EU regions," JRC Research Reports JRC112770, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Di Marcantonio, F. & Ciaian, P. & Castellanos, V., 2018. "Unfair trading practices in the dairy farm sector: Insights from an EU field survey," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275886, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Yanan Yu & Yong He & Xuan Zhao & Li Zhou, 2022. "Certify or not? An analysis of organic food supply chain with competing suppliers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 645-675, July.
    7. Michał Gazdecki & Grzegorz Leszczyński & Marek Zieliński, 2021. "Food Sector as an Interactive Business World: A Framework for Research on Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Onegina, Viktoriya & Megits, Nikolay & Kravchenko, Olha & Kravchenko, Yuliia, 2022. "Price transmission in milk supply chain in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(1), March.
    9. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2016. "On perishability and Vertical Price Transmission: empirical evidences from Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 5(2), September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:424-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.