IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v19y2003i3p325-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributional effects of commodity promotion programs by type of producer

Author

Listed:
  • Chanjin Chung

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, 322 Agricultural Hall, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078., E-mail: cchanji@okstate.edu)

  • Harry M. Kaiser

    (Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, 346 Warren Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853. E-mail: hmk2@cornell.edu)

Abstract

This study provides a theoretical background for the firm-level analysis on the distributional effects of commodity promotion programs. The conceptual basis of this approach is that firms differ due to differences in possessing endowments of fixed factors, and net returns to firms can be viewed as rents accruing to these factors. Therefore, the marginal return from an increase in demand due to a successful generic promotion programs may not be the same across firms because firms do not have the same level of fixed factors. The result of our analysis indicates that producers may not equally benefit from the collectively funded programs. Our marginal profit analysis indicates that a producer-financed promotion program may have greater benefits for producers with more endowed fixed factors than those with less endowed fixed factors.[EconLit citations: M370 and Q130]. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 19: 325-332, 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanjin Chung & Harry M. Kaiser, 2003. "Distributional effects of commodity promotion programs by type of producer," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 325-332.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:19:y:2003:i:3:p:325-332
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.10062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.10062
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.10062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chung, Chanjin & Kaiser, Harry M., 2000. "Do Farmers Get An Equal Bang For Their Buck From Generic Advertising Programs? A Theroetical And Empirical Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Panzar, John C & Willig, Robert D, 1978. "On the Comparative Statics of a Competitive Industry with Inframarginal Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(3), pages 474-478, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnson, Samantha R. & Brady, Michael P. & McCluskey, Jill J., . "Factors Affecting the Duration of Agricultural Marketing Orders," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter N. Thurman, 1993. "The Welfare Significance and Nonsignificance of General Equilibrium Demand and Supply Curves," Public Finance Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 449-469, October.
    2. Giancarlo Moschini, 1988. "The Cost Structure of Ontario Dairy Farms: A Microeconometric Analysis," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 36(2), pages 187-206, July.
    3. Zhang, Mingxia & Sexton, Richard J., 2000. "Optimal Commodity Promotion In Imperfectly Competitive Markets," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21823, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Huang, Ju-Chin & Kerry Smith, V., 1998. "Weak complementarity and production," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 329-333, September.
    5. Graham, John D. & Stennes, Brad & MacGregor, Robert J. & Meilke, Karl & Moschini, Giancarlo, 1990. "The Effects of Trade Liberalization on the Canadian Dairy and Poultry Sectors," Working Papers 244045, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    6. Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1997. "The nature of the research‐induced supply shift," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(3), pages 1-16.
    7. Reed, Albert J. & Hanson, Kenneth & Elitzak, Howard & Schluter, Gerald E., 1997. "Changing Consumer Food Prices: A User's Guide to ERS Analyses," Technical Bulletins 33574, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Hunnicutt, Lynn & Israelsen, L. Dwight, 2003. "Incentives to Advertise and Product Differentiation," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Fox, Glenn & Dickson, Ed, 1989. "Farm Growth In The Ontario Dairy Industry: A Skeptical Look At Gibrat'S Law," 1989 Conference, January 7-10, Tucson, Arizona 260170, Regional Research Committe NC-181: Determinants of Farm Size and Structure.
    10. Moore, Eli D. & Williams, Gary W., 2008. "Is the Texas Pecan Checkoff Program Working?," Reports 90497, Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:19:y:2003:i:3:p:325-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.