IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v21y1993i4p449-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Welfare Significance and Nonsignificance of General Equilibrium Demand and Supply Curves

Author

Listed:
  • Walter N. Thurman

    (North Carolina State University)

Abstract

General equilibrium demand and supply curves can be used to measure the multiple market effects of interventions m a single market. However, complications arise when feedback into the mtervened-m market comes through both demand and supply channels. This article presents a new and straightforward proof of the significance of general equilibrium curves when there is only one source of feedback, establishes the conditions under which multiple sources of feedback invalidate the analysis, and demonstrates that the general equilibrium curves become policy dependent when there are multiple sources of feedback.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter N. Thurman, 1993. "The Welfare Significance and Nonsignificance of General Equilibrium Demand and Supply Curves," Public Finance Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 449-469, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:21:y:1993:i:4:p:449-469
    DOI: 10.1177/109114219302100406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114219302100406
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/109114219302100406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter N. Thurman & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Consistent Estimation of General Equilibrium Welfare Effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 1041-1045.
    2. Just, Richard E & Hueth, Darrell L, 1979. "Welfare Measures in a Multimarket Framework," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(5), pages 947-954, December.
    3. Rucker, Randal R & Thurman, Walter N, 1990. "The Economic Effects of Supply Controls: The Simple Analytics of the U.S. Peanut Program," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 483-515, October.
    4. Harberger, Arnold C, 1971. "Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 785-797, September.
    5. Anderson, James E, 1976. "The Social Cost of Input Distortions: A Comment and a Generalization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 235-238, March.
    6. Panzar, John C & Willig, Robert D, 1978. "On the Comparative Statics of a Competitive Industry with Inframarginal Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(3), pages 474-478, June.
    7. Carlton, Dennis W, 1979. "Valuing Market Benefits and Costs in Related Output and Input Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(4), pages 688-696, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giancarlo Moschini & Harvey Lapan, 1997. "Intellectual Property Rights and the Welfare Effects of Agricultural R&D," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1229-1242.
    2. Bullock, David S. & Salhofer, Klaus, 2003. "Judging agricultural policies: a survey," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 225-243, May.
    3. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    4. David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer & Jukka Kola, 1999. "The Normative Analysis of Agricultural Policy: A General Framework and Review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 512-535, September.
    5. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Jean Paul CHAVAS & Thomas L. COX, 1996. "Abstract Of On Market Equilibrium Analysis," Staff Papers 393, University of Wisconsin Madison, AAE.
    3. Jean-Paul Chavas & Thomas L. Cox, 1997. "On Market Equilibrium Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(2), pages 500-513.
    4. Robert Albon, 1998. "The Efficiency Effects of Removing the Diesel Fuel Rebate Scheme," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 74(225), pages 145-152, June.
    5. Bullock, David S. & Dadakas, Dimitrios & Katranidis, Stelios D., 2009. "Measuring the Effects of Technology Change in Multiple Markets : Application to the Greek Cotton Yarn Industry," MPRA Paper 67204, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    6. Muth, Mary K & Rucker, Randal R & Thurman, Walter N & Chuang, Ching-Ta, 2003. "The Fable of the Bees Revisited: Causes and Consequences of the U.S. Honey Program," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 46(2), pages 479-516, October.
    7. Ward, Frank A., 1980. "Some Welfare Economic Considerations In The Evaluation Of Recreation Benefits: The Case Of New Mexico Warmwater Reservoirs," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278483, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Leonardo J. Basso, 2013. "On input market surplus and its relation to the downstream market game," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(1), pages 266-281, February.
    9. Barnett, William A. & Erwin Diewert, W. & Zellner, Arnold, 2011. "Introduction to measurement with theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 1-5, March.
    10. Graham,Errol George & Tchale,Hardwick & Ndione,Mamadou, 2020. "An Optimal Rice Policy for Sierra Leone : Balancing Consumer and Producer Welfare," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9369, The World Bank.
    11. Evan F. Koenig, 1985. "Indirect Methods for Regulating Externalities Under Uncertainty," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 100(2), pages 479-493.
    12. Russell Pittman, 2007. "Consumer Surplus as the Appropriate Standard for Antitrust Enforcement," EAG Discussions Papers 200709, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    13. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    14. Kooten, G. Cornelis van, 2013. "Modeling Forest Trade in Logs and Lumber: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis," Working Papers 149182, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    15. Stephen Martin, 2019. "The Potential Compensation Principle and Constant Marginal Utility of Income," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 383-393, September.
    16. Udo Ebert, 1986. "Equity and distribution in cost-benefit analysis," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 67-78, December.
    17. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Kevin Boyle & Sapna Kaul & Ali Hashemi & Xiaoshu Li, 2015. "Applicability of benefit transfers for evaluation of homeland security counterterrorism measures," Chapters, in: Carol Mansfield & V. K. Smith (ed.), Benefit–Cost Analyses for Security Policies, chapter 10, pages 225-253, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. B. Rudders, David & Ward, John M., 2015. "Own-price elasticity of open access supply as a long-run measure of fish stock abundance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 215-226.
    20. Heckman, James, 2001. "Accounting for Heterogeneity, Diversity and General Equilibrium in Evaluating Social Programmes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(475), pages 654-699, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:21:y:1993:i:4:p:449-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.