IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2011i11p727-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die Privatisierung öffentlichen Eigentums als Instrument der Wirtschaftspolitik: Privat- versus Staatseigentum an Unternehmen – praktische Umsetzung von Privatisierungsvorhaben und wirtschaftspolitische Schlussfolgerungen

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Böheim

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Der dritte Beitrag der WIFO-Artikelserie zum Thema "Privatisierung" beschäftigt sich mit der praktischen Umsetzung von Privatisierungsvorhaben und liefert zusammenfassende wirtschaftspolitische Schlussfolgerungen. Privatisierungsvorhaben sind langfristig nur auf Wettbewerbsmärkten ökonomisch erfolgreich und gesellschaftspolitisch akzeptiert. Ein "privatisierungswilliger" Staat steht vor der Herausforderung, ex ante die notwendigen Rahmenbedingungen für funktionierenden Wettbewerb zu schaffen und diesen ex post auch zu garantieren. Vor einer Privatisierung ist durch Liberalisierung eine Öffnung des Marktes für den Wettbewerb zu bewirken sowie durch eine entsprechende Regulierungs- und Wettbewerbspolitik zu begleiten, damit sich nachhaltig funktionierender Wettbewerb etablieren kann. Auf (gesellschafts )politischer Ebene kann die Akzeptanz von Privatisierungsvorhabenen durch Entideologisierung, die Herstellung von Transparenz sowie die Darstellung möglicher Alternativen ("Trade-offs") verbessert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Böheim, 2011. "Die Privatisierung öffentlichen Eigentums als Instrument der Wirtschaftspolitik: Privat- versus Staatseigentum an Unternehmen – praktische Umsetzung von Privatisierungsvorhaben und wirtschaftspolitisc," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 84(11), pages 727-741, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2011:i:11:p:727-741
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/43075
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Cavaliere & Simona Scabrosetti, 2008. "Privatization And Efficiency: From Principals And Agents To Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 685-710, September.
    2. Reinhard Selten, 1973. "A Simple Model of Imperfect Competition, where 4 are Few and 6 are Many," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 008, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    3. Jürgen Janger & Michael Böheim & Martin Falk & Rahel Falk & Werner Hölzl & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig & Michael Peneder & Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2010. "Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik nach der Wirtschaftskrise," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 83(8), pages 675-689, August.
    4. Hay, George A & Kelley, Daniel, 1974. "An Empirical Survey of Price Fixing Conspiracies," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(1), pages 13-38, April.
    5. Anna Bottasso & Alessandro Sembenelli, 2004. "Does ownership affect firms’ efficiency? Panel data evidence on Italy," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 769-786, December.
    6. Bresnahan, Timothy F & Reiss, Peter C, 1991. "Entry and Competition in Concentrated Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(5), pages 977-1009, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Böheim, 2012. "The Privatisation of Public Assets as an Economic Policy Instrument: Private versus Public Ownership of Companies – the Practical Implementation of Privatisation Projects and Economic Policy Conclusio," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 17(1), pages 55-68, May.
    2. Hackl, Franz & Kummer, Michael E. & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf & Zulehner, Christine, 2014. "Market structure and market performance in E-commerce," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 199-218.
    3. Kesternich, Iris & Schumacher, Heiner & Van Biesebroeck, Johannes & Grant, Iris, 2020. "Market size and competition: A “hump-shaped” result," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Haynes, Michelle & Thompson, Steve, 2008. "Price, price dispersion and number of sellers at a low entry cost shopbot," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 459-472, March.
    5. Roman Inderst & Frank P. Maier-Rigaud & Ulrich Schwalbe, 2014. "Umbrella Effects," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 739-763.
    6. Helmut Elsinger & Philipp Schmidt-Dengler & Christine Zulehner, 2019. "Competition in Treasury Auctions," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(1), pages 157-184, February.
    7. Michael Böheim, 2004. "Wettbewerb, Wettbewerbspolitik und Wirtschaftswachstum. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Evidenz für Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 77(10), pages 751-768, October.
    8. Zulehner, Christine & Elsinger, Helmut & Schmidt-Dengler, Philipp, 2013. "Competition in Austrian Treasury Auctions," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79963, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Nick Feltovich & Yasuyo Hamaguchi, 2018. "The Effect of Whistle‐Blowing Incentives on Collusion: An Experimental Study of Leniency Programs," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(4), pages 1024-1049, April.
    10. Franz Hackl & Michael Hölzl-Leitner & Dieter Pennerstorfer, 2021. "How to Measure Product Differentiation," Economics working papers 2021-01, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    11. Margaret C. Levenstein & Valerie Y. Suslow, 2011. "Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Determinants of Cartel Duration," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(2), pages 455-492.
    12. Iwan Bos & Joseph E. Harrington, Jr, 2010. "Endogenous cartel formation with heterogeneous firms," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 41(1), pages 92-117, March.
    13. Siegfried, John J. & Latta, Christopher, 1998. "Competition in the Retail College Textbook Market," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 105-115, February.
    14. Swoboda, Sandra Maria, 2017. "Einfluss ausgewählter Determinanten auf die Kartellbildung und -stabilität: Eine Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 176, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    15. Gunther Tichy, 2001. "What Do We Know about Success and Failure of Mergers?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 347-394, December.
    16. Roux, Catherine & Thöni, Christian, 2015. "Collusion among many firms: The disciplinary power of targeted punishment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 83-93.
    17. Buchheit, Steve & Feltovich, Nick, 2010. "Experimental evidence of a sunk–cost paradox: a study of pricing behavior in Bertrand–Edgeworth duopoly," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-124, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    18. Kyung Hwan Baik & Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Abhijit Ramalingam, 2021. "Group size and matching protocol in contests," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1716-1736, November.
    19. Tin Cheuk Leung & Kwok Ping Ping & Kevin K. Tsui, 2019. "What can deregulators deregulate? The case of electricity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-32, August.
    20. Paul Seabright, 2005. "National and European Champions - Burden or Blessing?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 6(02), pages 52-55, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Privatisierung Wirtschaftspolitik;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2011:i:11:p:727-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.