IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/stintr/v18y2017i4p589-608n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Estimation of Measles Vaccination Coverage Under Ranked Set Sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Das Radhakanta

    (Department of Statistics, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street Kolkata, 700073, West Bengal, India)

  • Verma Vivek

    (Department of Statistics, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, Assam, India)

  • Nath Dilip C.

    (Department of Statistics, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, Assam, India)

Abstract

The present article is concerned with the problem of estimating an unknown population proportion p, say, of a certain population characteristic in a dichotomous population using the data collected through ranked set sampling (RSS) strategy. Here, it is assumed that the proportion p is not fixed but a random quantity. A Bayes estimator of p is proposed under squared error loss function assuming that the prior density of p belongs to the family of Beta distributions. The performance of the proposed RSS-based Bayes estimator is compared with that of the corresponding classical version estimator based on maximum likelihood principle. The proposed procedure is used to estimate measles vaccination coverage probability among the children of age group 12-23 months in India using the real-life epidemiological data from National Family Health Survey-III.

Suggested Citation

  • Das Radhakanta & Verma Vivek & Nath Dilip C., 2017. "Bayesian Estimation of Measles Vaccination Coverage Under Ranked Set Sampling," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(4), pages 589-608, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:18:y:2017:i:4:p:589-608:n:9
    DOI: 10.21307/stattrans-2017-002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2017-002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21307/stattrans-2017-002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Berger & Elías Moreno & Luis Pericchi & M. Bayarri & José Bernardo & Juan Cano & Julián Horra & Jacinto Martín & David Ríos-Insúa & Bruno Betrò & A. Dasgupta & Paul Gustafson & Larry Wasserman &, 1994. "An overview of robust Bayesian analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 3(1), pages 5-124, June.
    2. Silvia Ferrari & Francisco Cribari-Neto, 2004. "Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 799-815.
    3. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Mahdizadeh, M., 2017. "A more efficient proportion estimator in ranked set sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 28-33.
    4. Paolino, Philip, 2001. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Models with Beta-Distributed Dependent Variables," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 325-346, January.
    5. Haiying Chen & Elizabeth A. Stasny & Douglas A. Wolfe, 2006. "Unbalanced Ranked Set Sampling for Estimating a Population Proportion," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 150-158, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radhakanta Das & Vivek Verma & Dilip C. Nath, 2017. "Bayesian Estimation Of Measles Vaccination Coverage Under Ranked Set Sampling," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 18(4), pages 589-608, December.
    2. Muhammad Suhail Rizwan & Asifa Obaid & Dawood Ashraf, 2017. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Default Risk: Empirical evidence from US Firms," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(3), pages 36-70, September.
    3. Silvia Balia, 2007. "Reporting expected longevity and smoking: evidence from the SHARE," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 07/10, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Baccini, Leonardo & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2012. "Legislative fractionalization and partisan shifts to the left increase the volatility of public energy R&D expenditures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45571, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Guillermo Martínez-Flórez & Artur J. Lemonte & Germán Moreno-Arenas & Roger Tovar-Falón, 2022. "The Bivariate Unit-Sinh-Normal Distribution and Its Related Regression Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Lucio Masserini & Matilde Bini & Monica Pratesi, 2017. "Effectiveness of non-selective evaluation test scores for predicting first-year performance in university career: a zero-inflated beta regression approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 693-708, March.
    7. Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr, 2014. "Two-Part Models for Fractional Responses Defined as Ratios of Integers," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Linda Gonçalves Veiga, 2013. "Voting functions in the EU-15," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 411-428, December.
    9. Buntaine, Mark T., 2011. "Does the Asian Development Bank Respond to Past Environmental Performance when Allocating Environmentally Risky Financing?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 336-350, March.
    10. Cristine Rauber & Francisco Cribari-Neto & Fábio M. Bayer, 2020. "Improved testing inferences for beta regressions with parametric mean link function," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 687-717, December.
    11. Jay Verkuilen & Michael Smithson, 2012. "Mixed and Mixture Regression Models for Continuous Bounded Responses Using the Beta Distribution," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(1), pages 82-113, February.
    12. Claus Michelsen & Peter Boenisch & Benny Geys, 2014. "(De)Centralization and voter turnout: theory and evidence from German municipalities," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 469-483, June.
    13. Diego Ramos Canterle & Fábio Mariano Bayer, 2019. "Variable dispersion beta regressions with parametric link functions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 1541-1567, October.
    14. Xiong, Qizhou, 2015. "Censored Fractional Response Model: Estimating Heterogeneous Relative Risk Aversion of European Households," IWH Discussion Papers 11/2015, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    15. Pablo Mitnik & Sunyoung Baek, 2013. "The Kumaraswamy distribution: median-dispersion re-parameterizations for regression modeling and simulation-based estimation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 177-192, February.
    16. S. Balia, 2011. "Survival expectations, subjective health and smoking: evidence from European countries," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 11/30, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    17. Guillermo Martínez-Flórez & Roger Tovar-Falón & Carlos Barrera-Causil, 2022. "Inflated Unit-Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, February.
    18. Edilberto Cepeda-Cuervo & Jorge Alberto Achcar & Liliana Garrido Lopera, 2014. "Bivariate beta regression models: joint modeling of the mean, dispersion and association parameters," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 677-687, March.
    19. José M. R. Murteira & Joaquim J. S. Ramalho, 2016. "Regression Analysis of Multivariate Fractional Data," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 515-552, April.
    20. Phillip Li, 2018. "Efficient MCMC estimation of inflated beta regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 127-158, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:18:y:2017:i:4:p:589-608:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://stat.gov.pl/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.