Author
Listed:
- Churski Paweł
(Faculty of Human Geography and Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland)
- Adamiak Czesław
(Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poznań, Poland)
- Dubownik Anna
(Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poznań, Poland)
- Pietrzykowski Maciej
(Institute of International Business and Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland)
- Szyda Barbara
(Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poznań, Poland)
Abstract
The EU’s cohesion policy is a fundamental component of intervention policies in united Europe. Its primary goal is to reduce the scale of spatial differences in development by striving to improve economic, social, and territorial cohesion. The outcomes of the actions implemented to date have been unsatisfactory. This underperformance is the basis for the ongoing discussion in Europe about the future paradigm of post-2027 cohesion policy. This article systematises the challenges and proposes recommendations concerning the actions of EU cohesion policy that should be considered in the new paradigm of this public intervention, enhancing its effectiveness and efficiency during a period of strong pressure from external development shocks, especially in less-developed areas such as inner peripheries. Its unique value is constructed on two fundamental factors. Firstly, the presented results are the outcome of qualitative field research, providing unique empirically factual material. Secondly, they concern the processes occurring in relation to the territories of the member state that is the largest beneficiary of EU cohesion policy, Poland, which is often regarded as a specific laboratory for cohesion policy.
Suggested Citation
Churski Paweł & Adamiak Czesław & Dubownik Anna & Pietrzykowski Maciej & Szyda Barbara, 2024.
"What Doesn’t Work in the European Cohesion Policy? Development Challenges of the Inner Periphery After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic,"
Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 43(4), pages 75-93.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:75-93:n:1006
DOI: 10.14746/quageo-2024-0038
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:75-93:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.