IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v43y2024i4p75-93n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Doesn’t Work in the European Cohesion Policy? Development Challenges of the Inner Periphery After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Churski Paweł

    (Faculty of Human Geography and Planning, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland)

  • Adamiak Czesław

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poznań, Poland)

  • Dubownik Anna

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poznań, Poland)

  • Pietrzykowski Maciej

    (Institute of International Business and Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland)

  • Szyda Barbara

    (Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The EU’s cohesion policy is a fundamental component of intervention policies in united Europe. Its primary goal is to reduce the scale of spatial differences in development by striving to improve economic, social, and territorial cohesion. The outcomes of the actions implemented to date have been unsatisfactory. This underperformance is the basis for the ongoing discussion in Europe about the future paradigm of post-2027 cohesion policy. This article systematises the challenges and proposes recommendations concerning the actions of EU cohesion policy that should be considered in the new paradigm of this public intervention, enhancing its effectiveness and efficiency during a period of strong pressure from external development shocks, especially in less-developed areas such as inner peripheries. Its unique value is constructed on two fundamental factors. Firstly, the presented results are the outcome of qualitative field research, providing unique empirically factual material. Secondly, they concern the processes occurring in relation to the territories of the member state that is the largest beneficiary of EU cohesion policy, Poland, which is often regarded as a specific laboratory for cohesion policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Churski Paweł & Adamiak Czesław & Dubownik Anna & Pietrzykowski Maciej & Szyda Barbara, 2024. "What Doesn’t Work in the European Cohesion Policy? Development Challenges of the Inner Periphery After the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 43(4), pages 75-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:75-93:n:1006
    DOI: 10.14746/quageo-2024-0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14746/quageo-2024-0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Brakman & Harry Garretsen & Charles van Marrewijk, 2015. "Regional resilience across Europe: on urbanisation and the initial impact of the Great Recession," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 225-240.
    2. Ron Boschma, 2015. "Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 733-751, May.
    3. Patrick Ballantyne & Alex Singleton & Les Dolega & Jacob Macdonald, 2023. "Integrating the Who, What, and Where of U.S. Retail Center Geographies," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(2), pages 488-510, February.
    4. Lewis Dijkstra & Hugo Poelman & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2020. "The geography of EU discontent," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 737-753, June.
    5. Panagiotis Artelaris & George Mavrommatis, 2022. "Territorial cohesion, the COVID-19 crisis and the urban paradox: Future challenges in urbanization and economic agglomeration," REGION, European Regional Science Association, vol. 9, pages 135-146.
    6. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Mountains in a flat world: why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 371-388.
    7. Simona Iammarino & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & Michael Storper, 2019. "Regional inequality in Europe: evidence, theory and policy implications," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 273-298.
    8. Wei Kang & Qingfang Wang, 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Small Businesses in the US: A Longitudinal Study from a Regional Perspective," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 46(3), pages 235-265, April.
    9. Alexander W. Bartik & Marianne Bertrand & Zoe Cullen & Edward L. Glaeser & Michael Luca & Christopher Stanton, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(30), pages 17656-17666, July.
    10. Brada, Josef C. & Gajewski, Paweł & Kutan, Ali M., 2021. "Economic resiliency and recovery, lessons from the financial crisis for the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional perspective from Central and Eastern Europe," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Wei Zhai & Mengyang Liu & Xinyu Fu & Zhong-Ren Peng, 2021. "American Inequality Meets COVID-19: Uneven Spread of the Disease across Communities," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(7), pages 2023-2043, November.
    12. Sveta Angelopoulos & Ashton de Silva & Yonatan Navon & Sarah Sinclair & Maria Yanotti, 2023. "Economic Resilience in a Pandemic: Did COVID‐19 Policy Effects Override Industry Diversity Impacts in Australia?," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 42(2), pages 153-171, June.
    13. Roberto Camagni, 2008. "Regional Competitiveness: Towards a Concept of Territorial Capital," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe, chapter 2, pages 33-47, Springer.
    14. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley & Ben Gardiner & Peter Tyler, 2016. "How Regions React to Recessions: Resilience and the Role of Economic Structure," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 561-585, April.
    15. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2015. "Spatial heterogeneity in the costs of the economic crisis in Europe: are cities sources of regional resilience?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(5), pages 951-972.
    16. Elias Giannakis & Adriana Bruggeman, 2020. "Regional disparities in economic resilience in the European Union across the urban–rural divide," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 1200-1213, September.
    17. Elena Marchigiani & Bertrando Bonfantini, 2022. "Urban Transition and the Return of Neighbourhood Planning. Questioning the Proximity Syndrome and the 15-Minute City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinko Muštra & Blanka Šimundić & Zvonimir Kuliš, 2020. "Does innovation matter for regional labour resilience? The case of EU regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 955-970, October.
    2. Guandong Song & Chengli Tang & Sheng Zhong & Liuguang Song, 2024. "Multiscale study on differences in regional economic resilience in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29021-29055, November.
    3. Ugo Fratesi & Giovanni Perucca, 2018. "Territorial capital and the resilience of European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 241-264, March.
    4. Panagiotis Artelaris, 2021. "Regional economic growth and inequality in Greece," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 141-158, February.
    5. Gergő Tóth & Zoltán Elekes & Adam Whittle & Changjun Lee & Dieter F. Kogler, 2022. "Technology Network Structure Conditions the Economic Resilience of Regions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 98(4), pages 355-378, August.
    6. Weilong Wang & Jianlong Wang & Shaersaikai Wulaer & Bing Chen & Xiaodong Yang, 2021. "The Effect of Innovative Entrepreneurial Vitality on Economic Resilience Based on a Spatial Perspective: Economic Policy Uncertainty as a Moderating Variable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Yannis Psycharis & Anastasia Panori & Dimitrios Athanasopoulos, 2022. "Public Investment and Regional Resilience: Empirical Evidence from the Greek Regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 57-79, February.
    8. Giulio Cainelli & Roberto Ganau & Marco Modica, 2019. "Industrial relatedness and regional resilience in the European Union," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(2), pages 755-778, April.
    9. O. V. Kuznetsova, 2022. "The Transformation of the Spatial Structure of an Economy in the Crisis and Post-Crisis Periods," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 451-458, December.
    10. Lisa Gianmoena & Vicente Rios, 2018. "The Determinants of Resilience in European Regions During the Great Recession: a Bayesian Model Averaging Approach," Discussion Papers 2018/235, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Meiyue Li & Xiaowen Wang, 2022. "How Regions React to Economic Crisis: Regional Economic Resilience in a Chinese Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    12. Michael Stierle & Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz & Stijn Rocher, 2018. "How did Regional Economic Structures in the EU Change during the Economic Crisis?," European Economy - Discussion Papers 088, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    13. Giuseppe Terzo, 2021. "Social capital, social economy and economic resilience of Italian provinces," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(5), pages 1113-1135, October.
    14. Giulia Urso & Marco Modica & Alessandra Faggian, 2019. "Resilience and Sectoral Composition Change of Italian Inner Areas in Response to the Great Recession," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Elias Giannakis & Christos T. Papadas, 2021. "Spatial Connectivity and Regional Economic Resilience in Turbulent Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Alessandra de Renzis & Alessandra Faggian & Giulia Urso, 2022. "Distant but Vibrant Places. Local Determinants of Adaptability to Peripherality," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(5), pages 483-501, December.
    17. Rios, Vicente & Gianmoena, Lisa, 2020. "The link between quality of government and regional resilience in Europe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1064-1084.
    18. Jing Jiang & Xiaoqing Zhang & Caihong Huang, 2022. "Influence of Population Agglomeration on Urban Economic Resilience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Guandong Song & Sheng Zhong & Liuguang Song, 2022. "Spatial Pattern Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors in County Economic Resilience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Bartalucci, Federico & Lozano-Gracia, Nancy & Dávalos, María, 2024. "Overcoming left-behindedness. Moving beyond the efficiency versus equity debate in territorial development," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125629, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:43:y:2024:i:4:p:75-93:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.