IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v18y2024i1p935-944n1020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Benefits of Sustainability Integration in Banking

Author

Listed:
  • Purcarea Liviu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Radulescu Carmen-Valentina

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study investigates the way banks choose to implement sustainability, and shows the advantages and challenges that this integration brings. We used a methodology that combined bibliometric analysis and case studies that included the integration of sustainability in different banking institutions. What was observed as a result of the study is that a correct adoption of the principles of long-term sustainability have multiple benefits: - increasing operational efficiency - improving the image of banks; positive impact on society and the environment. Through this research we hope to add to the specialized literature, coming with clear evidence that the banking environment can contribute with a positive impact on sustainability. The decision-making factors in the management and the board of the banking institutions use these evidences as information that can later be transformed into performance indicators, indicators that will contribute through their results to encouraging the implementation of sustainable development within the banks. We know that the future comes with climatic challenges, or precisely a sustainable banking strategy that includes the analysis of all risks can generate a balance sheet behind anticipated. This integration of sustainability in the banking sector encompasses environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles; ESG has gained increasing attention in recent years. "Sustainable economic development has become an important factor on the agenda of various economic and business institutions, so banks and financial institutions are also an essential part of this trend" (Tarkhanova, 2018). Case studies from real institutions are included to exemplify successful implementations (BNP PARIBAS Personal Finance). Although it faces challenges and obstacles, the banking sector has much to gain by adopting sustainability from a social, corporate governance and economic perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Purcarea Liviu & Radulescu Carmen-Valentina, 2024. "The Benefits of Sustainability Integration in Banking," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 935-944.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:935-944:n:1020
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2024-0081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2024-0081
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2024-0081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renata Karkowska, 2019. "Business Model as a Concept of Sustainability in the Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Adams, Renée B. & Ferreira, Daniel, 2009. "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 291-309, November.
    3. Karl V. Lins & Henri Servaes & Ane Tamayo, 2017. "Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 1785-1824, August.
    4. Stephen Bear & Noushi Rahman & Corinne Post, 2010. "The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 207-221, December.
    5. Salome Zimmermann, 2019. "Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul B. McGuinness & João Paulo Vieito & Mingzhu Wang, 2020. "Proactive government intervention, board gender balance, and stakeholder engagement in China and Europe," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 719-762, September.
    2. Gull, Ammar Ali & Ahsan, Tanveer & Qureshi, Muhammad Azeem & Mushtaq, Rizwan, 2023. "Striving to safeguard shareholders or maintain sustainability in periods of high uncertainty: A multi-country evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Jing Lu & Kathleen Rodenburg & Lianne Foti & Ann Pegoraro, 2022. "Are firms with better sustainability performance more resilient during crises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3354-3370, November.
    4. Lorenzo Ardito & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, 2021. "The link between female representation in the boards of directors and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from B corps," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 704-720, March.
    5. Saif Rehman & René Orij & Hashim Khan, 2020. "The search for alignment of board gender diversity, the adoption of environmental management systems, and the association with firm performance in Asian firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2161-2175, September.
    6. Pochara Arayakarnkul & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Board gender diversity, corporate social commitment and sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1706-1721, September.
    7. Iftekhar Hasan & Hui Li & Haizhi Wang & Yun Zhu, 2021. "Do Affiliated Bankers on Board Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility? US Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Suwongrat Papangkorn & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sirisak Chueykamhang, 2021. "Female directors and firm performance: Evidence from the Great Recession," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 598-610, June.
    9. Kuzey, Cemil & Gerged, Ali Meftah & Uyar, Ali & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2024. "Rethinking board structures in the age of multinational corporations: A global investigation," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    10. Liu, Chelsea, 2021. "CEO gender and employee relations: Evidence from labor lawsuits," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    12. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Boubaker, Sabri & Brinette, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2021. "Board feminization and innovation through corporate venture capital investments: The moderating effects of independence and management skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Owen, Ann L. & Temesvary, Judit, 2018. "The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 50-63.
    14. Katia Furlotti & Tatiana Mazza & Veronica Tibiletti & Silvia Triani, 2019. "Women in top positions on boards of directors: Gender policies disclosed in Italian sustainability reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 57-70, January.
    15. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    16. Kirsten Burkhardt & Pascal Nguyen & Evelyne Poincelot, 2020. "Agents of change: Women in top management and corporate environmental performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1591-1604, July.
    17. Galbreath, Jeremy, 2017. "Drivers Of Environmental Sustainability In Wine Firms: The Role And Effect Of Women In Leadership," Working Papers 253851, American Association of Wine Economists.
    18. Cornett, Marcia Millon & Erhemjamts, Otgontsetseg & Tehranian, Hassan, 2016. "Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. commercial banks around the financial crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 137-159.
    19. Muhammad Ali & Mirit K Grabarski & Sana Ahmed & Nazish Imtiaz, 2024. "Does leadership gender diversity drive corporate social responsibility and organizational outcomes? The role of organization size," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(3), pages 319-339, August.
    20. Truc (Peter) Do & Kathleen Herbohn, 2024. "The impact of board ethnic diversity and Chief Executive Officer role on corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(1), pages 575-605, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:935-944:n:1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.