IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v13y2019i1p1237-1247n109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Employees´ Key Competencies in Selected Health Care and Non-Health Care Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Vydrová Janka

    (Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Faculty of Management and Economics, Zlin, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The key competences of the employees are currently discussed and the open labor market. Competencies can be divided into three basic categories: knowledge competencies, application competencies and social competencies. Each work environment brings its specifics and the aim of the article is to find similarities and differences in the key competencies of employees of healthcare organizations and non-healthcare organizations. In order to achieve the objective of the article, a questionnaire survey was used, involving 791 respondents from healthcare organizations and 647 nonhealthcare organizations. In total 1438 questionnaires were evaluated. The research was conducted from May 2017 to September 2018. The first phase of the research was conducted through semi-standardized interviews with 73 representatives of healthcare organizations and 69 representatives of non-healthcare organizations. Qualitative research was attended by representatives of the personnel department, respectively human resource management department. The second stage of the research was followed by quantitative research. Quantitative research was conducted from January 2018 to September 2018. Key competencies were selected on the basis of importance, and the author of the article deals with those that respondents have identified as most important for their work. Here we can find the first differences in the identification of key competencies in healthcare organizations and nonhealthcare organizations. Respondents of healthcare organizations have identified as the most important the ability to communicate, the ability to learn, teamwork, reliability, dedication to work, empathy, emotional maturity and work under stress, while non-healthcare organizations respond as key communication skills, IT skills, creativity, team work, reliability, emotional maturity, and work under stress. Three research hypotheses have been identified. The research hypotheses were verified using the Two-sample t-Test statistic for equal means.

Suggested Citation

  • Vydrová Janka, 2019. "Comparative Study of Employees´ Key Competencies in Selected Health Care and Non-Health Care Organizations," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1237-1247, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:1237-1247:n:109
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2019-0109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2019-0109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2019-0109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Huang & Param Vir Singh & Anindya Ghose, 2015. "A Structural Model of Employee Behavioral Dynamics in Enterprise Social Media," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 2825-2844, December.
    2. Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Kanwal, Shamsa & Ali, Ahsan & Khan, Ali Nawaz & Waqas Ameen, Muhammad, 2018. "Moderating roles of IT competency and work cooperation on employee work performance in an ESM environment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    2. Shamsa Kanwal & Abdul Hameed Pitafi & Muhammad Yousaf Malik & Naseer Abbas Khan & Rao Muhammad Rashid, 2020. "Local Pakistani Citizens’ Benefits and Attitudes Toward China–Pakistan Economic Corridor Projects," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    3. Victor Aguirregabiria & Allan Collard-Wexler & Stephen P. Ryan, 2021. "Dynamic Games in Empirical Industrial Organization," NBER Working Papers 29291, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2019. "HR Practices for Supporting Interpersonal Trust and Its Consequences for Team Collaboration and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Yixin Lu & Alok Gupta & Wolfgang Ketter & Eric van Heck, 2019. "Dynamic Decision Making in Sequential Business-to-Business Auctions: A Structural Econometric Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3853-3876, August.
    6. Kashmala Latif & Abdul Hameed Pitafi & Muhammad Yousaf Malik & Zara Latif, 2019. "Individual Cultural Values and Consumer Animosity: Chinese Consumers’ Attitude Toward American Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
    7. Ali, Ahsan & Bahadur, Waseem & Wang, Nan & Luqman, Adeel & Khan, Ali Nawaz, 2020. "Improving team innovation performance: Role of social media and team knowledge management capabilities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    8. Xiongfei Cao & Ali Nawaz Khan & Ahsan Ali & Naseer Abbas Khan, 0. "Consequences of Cyberbullying and Social Overload while Using SNSs: A Study of Users’ Discontinuous Usage Behavior in SNSs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    9. Prodanova, Jana & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2021. "Is job performance conditioned by work-from-home demands and resources?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Xiongfei Cao & Ali Nawaz Khan & Ahsan Ali & Naseer Abbas Khan, 2020. "Consequences of Cyberbullying and Social Overload while Using SNSs: A Study of Users’ Discontinuous Usage Behavior in SNSs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1343-1356, December.
    11. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Miquel-Romero, Maria-Jose & Cruz-Ros, Sonia, 2021. "Why and how to use enterprise social media platforms: The employee’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 517-526.
    12. Warut Khern-am-nuai & Karthik Kannan & Hossein Ghasemkhani, 2018. "Extrinsic versus Intrinsic Rewards for Contributing Reviews in an Online Platform," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 871-892, December.
    13. Yuan Chen & Hsing Kenneth Cheng & Yang Liu & Jingchuan Pu & Liangfei Qiu & Ning Wang, 2022. "Knowledge‐sharing ties and equivalence in corporate online communities: A novel source to understand voluntary turnover," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3896-3913, October.
    14. Zaiyan Wei & Mo Xiao & Rong Rong, 2021. "Network Size and Content Generation on Social Media Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1406-1426, May.
    15. Yingjie Zhang & Beibei Li & Xueming Luo & Xiaoyi Wang, 2019. "Personalized Mobile Targeting with User Engagement Stages: Combining a Structural Hidden Markov Model and Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 787-804, September.
    16. Rong Zhou & Zhilin Luo & Shunbin Zhong & Xinhua Zhang & Yihui Liu, 2022. "The Impact of Social Media on Employee Mental Health and Behavior Based on the Context of Intelligence-Driven Digital Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Clarence Lee & Elie Ofek & Thomas J. Steenburgh, 2018. "Personal and Social Usage: The Origins of Active Customers and Ways to Keep Them Engaged," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2473-2495, June.
    18. Jan Brocke & Wolfgang Maaß & Peter Buxmann & Alexander Maedche & Jan Marco Leimeister & Günter Pecht, 2018. "Future Work and Enterprise Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 357-366, August.
    19. Armah, Abdul Karim & Li, Jinfa, 2023. "Generational cohorts’ social media acceptance as a delivery tool in sub-Sahara Africa motorcycle industry: The role of cohort technical know-how in technology acceptance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Han Lai & Abdul Hameed Pitafi & Noman Hasany & Tahir Islam, 2021. "Enhancing Employee Agility Through Information Technology Competency: An Empirical Study of China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:1237-1247:n:109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.