IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v29y2013i4p489-510n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Optimization Approach to Selective Editing

Author

Listed:
  • Arbue´s Ignacio

    (D.G.Metodologı´a, Calidad y TIC, Instituto Nacional de Estadı´stica, Paseo de la Castellana, 28071Madrid, Spain)

  • Revilla Pedro

    (D.G.Metodologı´a, Calidad y TIC, Instituto Nacional de Estadı´stica, Paseo de la Castellana, 28071Madrid, Spain)

  • Salgado David

    (D.G.Metodologı´a, Calidad y TIC, Instituto Nacional de Estadı´stica, Paseo de la Castellana, 28071Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

We set out two generic principles for selective editing, namely the minimization of interactive editing resources and data quality assurance. These principles are translated into a generic optimization problem with two versions. On the one hand, if no cross-sectional information is used in the selection of units, we derive a stochastic optimization problem. On the other hand, if that information is used, we arrive at a combinatorial optimization problem. These problems are substantiated by constructing a so-called observation-prediction model, that is, a multivariate statistical model for the nonsampling measurement errors assisted by an auxiliary model to make predictions. The restrictions of these problems basically set upper bounds upon the modelled measurement errors entering the survey estimators. The bounds are chosen by subject-matter knowledge. Furthermore, we propose a selection efficiency measure to assess any selective editing technique and make a comparison between this approach and some score functions. Special attention is paid to the relationship of this approach with the editing fieldwork conditions, arising issues such as the selection versus the prioritization of units and the connection between the selective and macro editing techniques. This approach neatly links the selection and prioritization of sampling units for editing (micro approach) with considerations upon the survey estimators themselves (macro approach).

Suggested Citation

  • Arbue´s Ignacio & Revilla Pedro & Salgado David, 2013. "An Optimization Approach to Selective Editing," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 489-510, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:29:y:2013:i:4:p:489-510:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2013-0037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2013-0037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leopold Granquist, 1997. "The New View on Editing," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 65(3), pages 381-387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Waal Ton, 2013. "Selective Editing: A Quest for Efficiency and Data Quality," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 473-488, December.
    2. Di Zio Marco & Guarnera Ugo, 2013. "A Contamination Model for Selective Editing," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 539-555, December.
    3. George Petrakos & Claudio Conversano & Gregory Farmakis & Francesco Mola & Roberta Siciliano & Photis Stavropoulos, 2004. "New ways of specifying data edits," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 249-274, May.
    4. Valentin Todorov & Matthias Templ & Peter Filzmoser, 2011. "Detection of multivariate outliers in business survey data with incomplete information," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 5(1), pages 37-56, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:29:y:2013:i:4:p:489-510:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.