IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmen/v20y2016i2p87-101n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of business process maturity and organisational performance relations

Author

Listed:
  • Kalinowski T. Bartosz

    (University of Lodz, Faculty of Management)

Abstract

The paper aims to present results of the study on business process maturity in relation to organisational performance. A two-phase methodology, based on literature review and survey was used. The literature is a source of knowledge about business process maturity and organisational performance, whereas the research on process maturity vs organisational performance in Polish Enterprises provides findings based on 84 surveyed companies. The main areas of the research covered: identification and analysis of maturity related variables and identification of organisational performance perspectives and its relation to process maturity. The study shows that there is a significant positive relation between process maturity and organisational performance. Although there are research on such relation available, they are scarce and have some significant limitations in terms of research sample or the scope of maturity or organisational performance covered. This publication is part of a project funded by the National Science Centre awarded by decision number DEC-2011/01/D/HS4/04070.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalinowski T. Bartosz, 2016. "Analysis of business process maturity and organisational performance relations," Management, Sciendo, vol. 20(2), pages 87-101, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmen:v:20:y:2016:i:2:p:87-101:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/manment-2015-0052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/manment-2015-0052
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/manment-2015-0052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lili‐Anne Kihn, 2010. "Performance outcomes in empirical management accounting research," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 468-492, June.
    2. Michael Rosemann & Jan Brocke, 2015. "The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 105-122, Springer.
    3. Robert K. Kazanjian & Robert Drazin, 1989. "An Empirical Test of a Stage of Growth Progression Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1489-1503, December.
    4. Christopher Ittner, 2008. "Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 261-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberts, Edward Baer., 1989. "Evolving toward product and market-orientation : the early years of technology-based firms," Working papers 2515-89., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Deshani C. Hettiarachchi, 2023. "Effects of Non-Financial Performance Management and Risk Disclosures on Not-For-Profit Financial Vulnerability: Evidence from The Australian Aged Care Not-For-Profit Sector," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 723-745, December.
    3. Lino Cinquini & Rosa Alba Miraglia & Riccardo Giannetti, 2016. "Editoriale. Strumenti di gestione dei costi e misure di performance negli attuali contesti competitivi," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 5-14.
    4. Steven Klepper & Sally Sleeper, 2005. "Entry by Spinoffs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1291-1306, August.
    5. Daniel Tarka, 2004. "High-growth Micro Enterprises:managing the risk aspects of enterprise growth," Microeconomics 0403004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Wendy L. Martin & Alexander McKelvie & G. T. Lumpkin, 2016. "Centralization and delegation practices in family versus non-family SMEs: a Rasch analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 755-769, October.
    7. Martin Lehnert & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 377-419, August.
    8. Ugo Rizzo & Francesco Nicolli & Laura Ramaciotti, 2014. "The Heterogeneity of the Development Process of New Technology-Based Firms. Implication for Innovation Policies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 114-132, March.
    9. Zhai, Endong & Shi, Yongjiang & Gregory, Mike, 2007. "The growth and capability development of electronics manufacturing service (EMS) companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Mirna Amirya, 2019. "What Drives the Institutionalization of Performance Measurement Systems in Indonesian Local Government?," GATR Journals jber166, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    11. Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy, 2020. "Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-30, August.
    12. Kalm, Matias, 2012. "The Impact of Networking on Firm Performance - Evidence from Small and Medium-Sized Firms in Emerging Technology Areas," Discussion Papers 1278, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    13. Moyassar Al-Taie & Aileen Cater-Steel, 2020. "The Organisational Life Cycle Scale: An Empirical Validation," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 29(2), pages 293-325, September.
    14. Robert Kok & Theo Postma & A. Steerneman, 2008. "Cross-Classification Analysis Using Prediction Logic Versus Theory-Testing Logic: Comments on the Use of the DEL-Technique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 491-511, August.
    15. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2022. "Call for Papers, Issue 5/2024," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 841-843, December.
    16. Parhankangas, Annaleena & Arenius, Pia, 2003. "From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 463-481, March.
    17. Liliya Oxtorp, 2014. "Dynamic managerial capability of technology-based international new ventures—a basis for their long-term competitive advantage," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 389-420, December.
    18. Daniel Tzabbar & Jaclyn Margolis, 2017. "Beyond the Startup Stage: The Founding Team’s Human Capital, New Venture’s Stage of Life, Founder–CEO Duality, and Breakthrough Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 857-872, October.
    19. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Muhammad Rizwan & Ismail Senturk, 2022. "The Impact Of Intangible Assets And Firm-Specific Factors On Cash Flows: An Empirical Analysis Of Public Firms Listed On The Pakistan Stock Exchange," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 11(3), pages 16-26.
    20. Czarnecki Maciej & Starosta Anna, 2014. "Two Faces of Anti-crisis Management: from Definitions to Concepts," Management, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmen:v:20:y:2016:i:2:p:87-101:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.