IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ijomae/v60y2024i3p186-198n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public participation in rural areas supported by regional governments in the context of sustainable rural development: The case of Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Olejniczak Jarosław

    (Department of Finance, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Bednarska-Olejniczak Dorota

    (Department of Marketing Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

The processes involved in the sustainable development goals (SDGs) localization, sustainable rural development (SRD), and the use of public participation to support the achievement of the SDGs have gained importance in recent years. The aim of this article is to analyze the solution created by regional governments in Poland to combine these issues. This paper utilizes a qualitative case study-based approach. Firstly, the analysis of the development strategies of 11 Polish regions was carried out. Further, the analyses of the grant process allowed one to determine the SDG targets, which are associated with individual thematic areas of financing and with specific tasks proposed for implementation by the residents. It may be concluded that the analyzed program targets largely corresponded to the selected SDG targets. Such programs may be used as a tool for supporting the bottom-up diagnosis procedure, in the scope of desired activities supporting the achievement of the SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Olejniczak Jarosław & Bednarska-Olejniczak Dorota, 2024. "Public participation in rural areas supported by regional governments in the context of sustainable rural development: The case of Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 60(3), pages 186-198.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ijomae:v:60:y:2024:i:3:p:186-198:n:1003
    DOI: 10.2478/ijme-2024-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2024-0013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ijme-2024-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Shakil Ahmad & Noraini Bt. Abu Talib, 2011. "Decentralization and Participatory Rural Development: A Literature Review," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 5(4), December.
    2. Ulrich Graute, 2016. "Local Authorities Acting Globally for Sustainable Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(11), pages 1931-1942, November.
    3. Francesca Manes-Rossi & Isabel Brusca & Rebecca Levy Orelli & Peter C. Lorson & Ellen Haustein, 2023. "Features and drivers of citizen participation: Insights from participatory budgeting in three European cities," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 201-223, February.
    4. Boulding, Carew & Wampler, Brian, 2010. "Voice, Votes, and Resources: Evaluating the Effect of Participatory Democracy on Well-being," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 125-135, January.
    5. Maria Jose Bastante-Ceca & Jose Luis Fuentes-Bargues & Levente Hufnagel & Florin-Constantin Mihai & (ed.), 2020. "Sustainability Assessment at the 21st century," Books, IntechOpen, number 6096, January-J.
    6. Muhammad Shakil Ahmad & Noraini Bt. Abu Talib, 2011. "Decentralization and participatory rural development: a literature review," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(3), pages 1-32.
    7. Stephanie L. McNulty, 2015. "Barriers to Participation: Exploring Gender in Peru's Participatory Budget Process," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(11), pages 1429-1443, November.
    8. Dorota Bednarska-Olejniczak & Jarosław Olejniczak & Viktorie Klímová, 2021. "Grants for Local Community Initiatives as a Way to Increase Public Participation of Inhabitants of Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Shakil Ahmad & Noraini Bt. Abu Talib, 2013. "Local Government Systems and Decentralization: Evidence from Pakistan’s Devolution Plan," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(1), March.
    2. Wahid, Abdul & Ahmad, Muhammad Shakil & Abu Talib, Noraini Bt. & Shah, Iqtidar Ali & Tahir, Muhammad & Jan, Farzand Ali & Saleem, Muhammad Qaiser, 2017. "Barriers to empowerment: Assessment of community-led local development organizations in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1361-1370.
    3. Micael Sousa, 2024. "Moving Pieces and Allocating Budget Together: A Framework for Using Analog Serious Games in Sustainable Collaborative Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Mayka, Lindsay & Abbott, Jared, 2023. "Varieties of participatory institutions and interest intermediation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    7. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    8. Adriana Gómez-Cabrera & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Laura Montalban-Domingo & Jose Luis Ponz-Tienda & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Identification of Factors Affecting the Performance of Rural Road Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. de Renzio, Paolo & Wehner, Joachim, 2017. "The impacts of fiscal openness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Adamczyk Adam & Dawidowicz Dawid & Prokopiou Stella & Sirakoulis Kleanthis, 2024. "Determinants of the success of participatory budgets in Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 60(3), pages 199-210.
    11. David Tremblay & Sabine Gowsy & Olivier Riffon & Jean-François Boucher & Samuel Dubé & Claude Villeneuve, 2021. "A Systemic Approach for Sustainability Implementation Planning at the Local Level by SDG Target Prioritization: The Case of Quebec City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Alexandra Lavers Westin & Leonardo Rosado & Yuliya Kalmykova & João Patrício, 2020. "Methods for Downscaling National Material Consumption Data to the Regional and Municipal Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Dorota Bednarska-Olejniczak & Jarosław Olejniczak & Viktorie Klímová, 2021. "Grants for Local Community Initiatives as a Way to Increase Public Participation of Inhabitants of Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Binglu Wu & Wenzhuo Liang & Jiening Wang & Dongxu Cui, 2022. "Rural Residents’ Perceptions of Ecosystem Services: A Study from Three Topographic Areas in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Devkota, Bishnu Prasad, 2020. "Social inclusion and deliberation in response to REDD+ in Nepal’s community forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Tom Henfrey & Giuseppe Feola & Gil Penha‐Lopes & Filka Sekulova & Ana Margarida Esteves, 2023. "Rethinking the sustainable development goals: Learning with and from community‐led initiatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 211-222, February.
    17. Francisco Tomatis & Luisa F. Lozano-Castellanos & Oscar L. García-Navarrete & Adriana Correa-Guimaraes & Maria Sol Wilhelm & Ouiam Fatiha Boukharta & Diana A. Murcia Velasco & José E. Méndez-Vanegas, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Sustainability in Cities of The French Way of Saint James (Camino de Santiago Francés) in Castilla y León according to The Spanish Urban Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Mogues, Tewodaj & Erman, Alvina, 2016. "Institutional arrangements to make public spending responsive to the poor—(where) have they worked?: Review of the evidence on four major intervention types," IFPRI discussion papers 1519, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Enock Siankwilimba & Chisoni Mumba & Bernard Mudenda Hang’ombe & Joshua Munkombwe & Jacqueline Hiddlestone-Mumford & Munyaradzi A. Dzvimbo & Md Enamul Hoque, 2024. "Bioecosystems towards sustainable agricultural extension delivery: effects of various factors," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 21801-21843, September.
    20. Abu Elias Sarker & Syed Awais Ahmad Tipu & Farhana Razzaque, 2022. "An Integrative Dynamic Framework of Social Accountability: Determinants, Initiatives, and Outcomes," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 117-133, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    grants; citizen participation; small communities; subnational government; countryside;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ijomae:v:60:y:2024:i:3:p:186-198:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sgh.waw.pl/kgs/en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.