IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/erapso/v15y2022i25p34-47n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Worker and Change: Obstacle or Opportunity?

Author

Listed:
  • Kitov Yael Aloni

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Neagoe Alexandru

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The present article sets out to explore the relationship between the social worker’s identity and the organizational change within the Ministry of Welfare in Israel. The article builds on the observation that successful organizational change requires a good understanding of the impact of change on the identity of the employees. First, the study sets out to clarify the notion of regulation and indicates some current trends in the specialized literature regarding the regulation of social services. Next, an analysis is offered of the regulator’s role in Israel’s Ministry of Welfare, special attention being paid to a number of characteristics and challenges, such as: the regulator’s loneliness, regulatory capacity, and specialization and division (versus inclusion and expertise). A more detailed and nuanced analysis is then offered regarding the identity of the social worker, as a professional in the field of social welfare; specific attention is paid to the professional aspect, the legal-value aspect, and the organizational-institutional aspect. A concluding section brings together some of the key findings and implications of the present study.

Suggested Citation

  • Kitov Yael Aloni & Neagoe Alexandru, 2022. "The Social Worker and Change: Obstacle or Opportunity?," European Review of Applied Sociology, Sciendo, vol. 15(25), pages 34-47, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:erapso:v:15:y:2022:i:25:p:34-47:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/eras-2022-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eras-2022-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eras-2022-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Braithwaite & Toni Makkai & Valerie Braithwaite, 2007. "Regulating Aged Care," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12540.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Hutchens, 2011. "Playing games of governance: How and why Fair Trade pioneers evade corporate capture," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 221-240, June.
    2. Marcio Iorio Aranha, 2016. "Telecommunications Regulatory Design in Brazil: Networking around State Capacity Deficits," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 83-105.
    3. Bomhoff, Manja & Friele, Roland, 2017. "Complaints in long-term care facilities for older persons: Why residents do not give ‘free advice’," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 75-81.
    4. Peter Mascini, 2013. "Why was the enforcement pyramid so influential? And what price was paid?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 48-60, March.
    5. Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen & Christine Parker, 2009. "Testing responsive regulation in regulatory enforcement," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 376-399, December.
    6. John Braithwaite, 2013. "Relational republican regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 124-144, March.
    7. Anne Daly & Tesfaye Gebremedhin & Muhammad Sayem, 2013. "A Case Study of Affirmative Action Australian-style for Indigenous People," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 16(2), pages 277-294.
    8. Christine Parker, 2013. "Twenty years of responsive regulation: An appreciation and appraisal," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 2-13, March.
    9. Kristina Murphy & Tom R. Tyler & Amy Curtis, 2009. "Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, March.
    10. John Braithwaite & Seung‐Hun Hong, 2015. "The iteration deficit in responsive regulation: Are regulatory ambassadors an answer?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 16-29, March.
    11. Kristina Murphy, 2016. "Turning defiance into compliance with procedural justice: Understanding reactions to regulatory encounters through motivational posturing," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 93-109, March.
    12. Sarah Kaine & Jenny Green, 2013. "Outing the Silent Partner: Espousing the Economic Values that Operate in Not-For-Profit Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 215-225, November.
    13. Skinnars Josefsson, Malin & Nydahl, Margaretha & Persson, Inger & Mattsson Sydner, Ylva, 2019. "Adherence to a regulation that aims to prevent and treat malnutrition—The case of Swedish elderly care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 688-694.
    14. Adams, Samantha A. & Paul, Katharina T. & Ketelaars, Corry & Robben, Paul, 2015. "The use of mystery guests by the Dutch Health Inspectorate: Results of a pilot study in long-term intramural elderly care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 821-830.
    15. Jeroen van der Heijden, 2021. "Why meta‐research matters to regulation and governance scholarship: An illustrative evidence synthesis of responsive regulation research," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 123-142, November.
    16. Stephen Davey & Carol Richards, 2013. "Supermarkets and private standards: unintended consequences of the audit ritual," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(2), pages 271-281, June.
    17. Cameron Parsell, 2016. "Surveillance in supportive housing: Intrusion or autonomy?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(15), pages 3189-3205, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:erapso:v:15:y:2022:i:25:p:34-47:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.