IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v21y2024i2p44-58n1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in IT Project Management Awareness According to Business Process Management Experts’ Opinion: Comparative Study 2017-2023

Author

Listed:
  • Chmielarz Witold

    (University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland)

  • Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz Anna

    (University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose. The main purpose of this article is to compare experts’ opinions over two time periods to examine the differences in IT project management awareness and perception. The study was based on opinions expressed in a survey conducted in 2017 and 2023 during symposium meetings related to business process management. Methodology. The paper’s methodology is based on a theoretical and research approach. The survey questionnaire was constructed using a literature analysis and the authors’ own experience. The authors formulated a hypothesis addressing the issue of how awareness regarding IT project management has changed over the last five years. The main hypothesis was supplemented by auxiliary hypotheses concerning the variation regarding awareness of: the need to implement information systems into organizations, the need to apply process management within these implementations, and the determinants and effects of IT project management. Main results. The main results and findings of the research were determined by the validity of the hypotheses using the Fisher-Snedecor test. In addition, differences in city and Euclidean distance indices were calculated, which indicated the directions of changes in experts’ views on the place and role of project management. The results pointed to the existence of significant discrepancies between experts’ awareness in 2017 and 2023. The conclusions obtained from the survey may have important implications for both business practitioners and educational purposes. The theoretical contribution. Findings: the findings show the opinions of experts including individuals with a strong research interest and those with an academic background, and also incorporated respondents with substantial practical experience. Part of the respondents’ competence was related to years of using traditional project management methods, which in some way also shapes the approach to agile and hybrid methodologies. Practical implications (if applicable). The conclusion for future project management education at universities, consulting firms, specialized courses, etc. shows profiling in the direction of modern IT development trends correspond to the changes connected with strategies of modern mobile companies with remote access to the data, taking into account changes connected based on representatives from Generation Z, the demographic currently entering the workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Chmielarz Witold & Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz Anna, 2024. "Changes in IT Project Management Awareness According to Business Process Management Experts’ Opinion: Comparative Study 2017-2023," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 44-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:44-58:n:1003
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2024-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2024-0018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2024-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    process management; project management; organization information system; the impact of project management on the organization.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:44-58:n:1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.