IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cejopp/v13y2019i1p12-22n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning for resilience in the case of power shortage: The Swedish STYREL policy

Author

Listed:
  • Olausson Pär Magnus

Abstract

Modern society has developed a growing dependence on electricity in order to carry out important societal functions. This implies the risk of cascading failures to society in the case of power shortage. The creation of a resilient and sustainable power energy system is therefore crucial. Equal crucial is the preparedness for the event of power shortage. As a part of the Swedish crisis management system, the Swedish Energy Agency (EM) has developed a planning system, STYREL, to identify social important objects in order to ensure important social functions in the case of power shortage. This article examines STYREL as a policy network and as a planning system to ensure a sustainable and resilient power supply. The study focus on the design of the system, the implementation of the system based on the results from the two rounds completed in 2010 and 2014. Using interviews with coordinators at the local and regional level in three counties and a survey including all 21 coordinators at the regional level, it indicates that the design of the planning system reviles opportunities for improvements of the planning system. The study also indicates that the coordinators at the local level lack trust in the planning system depending on both the lack of resource and the lack of feedback. This in turn indicates challenges for the system from a resilient and sustainability point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Olausson Pär Magnus, 2019. "Planning for resilience in the case of power shortage: The Swedish STYREL policy," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 12-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:12-22:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2019-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cejpp-2019-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghanem, Dana Abi & Mander, Sarah & Gough, Clair, 2016. "“I think we need to get a better generator”: Household resilience to disruption to power supply during storm events," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 171-180.
    2. Johansson, Vicki, 2015. "Policy networks—A threat to procedural and expert-based decision making and the quality of public risk decisions?," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 3-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven DiFalco & Anita T. Morzillo, 2021. "Comparison of Attitudes towards Roadside Vegetation Management across an Exurban Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Heidenstrøm, Nina & Throne-Holst, Harald, 2020. "“Someone will take care of it”. Households' understanding of their responsibility to prepare for and cope with electricity and ICT infrastructure breakdowns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Liévanos, Raoul S. & Horne, Christine, 2017. "Unequal resilience: The duration of electricity outages," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 201-211.
    4. Paul Nduhuura & Matthias Garschagen & Abdellatif Zerga, 2020. "Mapping and Spatial Analysis of Electricity Load Shedding Experiences: A Case Study of Communities in Accra, Ghana," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Kerianne Lawson, 2022. "Electricity outages and residential fires: Evidence from Cape Town, South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 90(4), pages 469-485, December.
    6. Johansson Vicki, 2015. "When will we ever learn ?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 149-170, December.
    7. Marko Jelić & Marko Batić & Nikola Tomašević & Andrew Barney & Heracles Polatidis & Tracey Crosbie & Dana Abi Ghanem & Michael Short & Gobind Pillai, 2020. "Towards Self-Sustainable Island Grids through Optimal Utilization of Renewable Energy Potential and Community Engagement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Márcio das Chagas Moura & Helder Henrique Lima Diniz & Enrique López Droguett & Beatriz Sales da Cunha & Isis Didier Lins & Vicente Ribeiro Simoni, 2017. "Embedding resilience in the design of the electricity supply for industrial clients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, November.
    9. Tahir, Muhammad Faizan & Chen, Haoyong & Khan, Asad & Javed, Muhammad Sufyan & Cheema, Khalid Mehmood & Laraik, Noman Ali, 2020. "Significance of demand response in light of current pilot projects in China and devising a problem solution for future advancements," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Schmitz, William Ismael & Schmitz, Magdiel & Canha, Luciane Neves & Garcia, Vinícius Jacques, 2020. "Proactive home energy storage management system to severe weather scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Vaidyanathan Krishnamurthy & Alexis Kwasinski, 2019. "Modeling of Distributed Generators Resilience Considering Lifeline Dependencies During Extreme Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1997-2011, September.
    12. Hussain, Akhtar & Bui, Van-Hai & Kim, Hak-Man, 2019. "Microgrids as a resilience resource and strategies used by microgrids for enhancing resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 56-72.
    13. Mariah D. Ehmke & Bhagyashree Katare & Kristin Kiesel & Jason S. Bergtold & Jerrod M. Penn & Kathryn A. Boys, 2022. "U.S. agricultural university students' mental well‐being and resilience during the first wave of COVID‐19: Discordant expectations and experiences across genders," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 129-161, March.
    14. Frauke Wiese, 2016. "Resilience Thinking as an Interdisciplinary Guiding Principle for Energy System Transitions," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:12-22:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.