IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v11y2020i2p41-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Company innovative values differentiation in the context of personal mechanisms of employee proactivity and work types

Author

Listed:
  • Irena A. Esaulova

    (Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, Russia)

Abstract

A culture that supports personnel initiatives is of critical importance when building a holistic mechanism for the innovative development of an organization. At the same time, in both theory and practice, there is a lack of understanding of the reasons behind the insufficient effectiveness of such cultures. We assume that this is a consequence of employees’ selective perception of company innovative values, which is due to differences in the personal mechanisms of proactivity (PMP) of employees performing different types of work. The study aims to identify the innovative values corresponding to the PMP and the nature of employees’ work. The methodological framework of the research is the concepts of personal initiative and proactive behavior of employees. The data are obtained from six companiesin the city of Perm (Russia) during a survey of 265 employees, whose work implies taking the initiative (creating new intelligent products and services, promoting and selling products). The research method is a questionnaire based on the model of company values that are focused on workers initiatives, and three types of PMP – self-leadership, self-development and engagement. To process the data, the author uses PLS analysis and SPSS software platform. As a result, we identify three groups of corporate values that support employees’ proactive behavior: (a) in the field of sales and promotion of products and services – values of leadership and personal success; (b) in the creation and development of intelligent products and solutions – self-directed learning, creative search and innovation; (c) regardless of the type of professional activity – engagement in improving the organization’s activity. The obtained results make an additional contribution to understanding the mechanisms of the influence of innovative culture on the initiative behavior of personnel.

Suggested Citation

  • Irena A. Esaulova, 2020. "Company innovative values differentiation in the context of personal mechanisms of employee proactivity and work types," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 41-52, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:41-52
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-11-2-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/84/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2020/626
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2019-11-2-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehlika Saraç & Ismail Efil & Mehmet Eryilmaz, 2014. "A study of the relationship between person-organization fit and employee creativity," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(5), pages 479-501, May.
    2. Kerry D. Carson & David S. Baker & Patricia A. Lanier, 2014. "The role of individual cultural traits and proactivity in an organizational setting," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 348-366, March.
    3. A.S. Gogoleva & E.S. Balabanova & Azer G. Efendiev, 2016. "Determinants of Employee Innovative Behavior: Do Foreign and Domestic Companies in Russia Differ?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 53/MAN/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Jose Moleiro Martins & Antonio Abreu & Joao Calado, 2019. "The Need to Develop a Corporate Culture of Innovation in a Globalization Context," Chapters, in: George Yungchih Wang (ed.), Globalization, IntechOpen.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elena B. Mudrova & Nelly N. Murawiowa, 2021. "Digitalization in public administration in the housing and utility sector and the human factor," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 92-105, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Suwanti & U. Udin & W. Widodo, 2018. "Person-Organization Fit, Person-Job Fit, and Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 146-159.
    2. Mohamed Laid Ouakouak & Noufou Ouedraogo, 2017. "Antecedents Of Employee Creativity And Organisational Innovation: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-26, October.
    3. repec:ers:journl:v:vi:y:2018:i:3:p:146-159 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. S. Suwanti & U. Udin & W. Widodo, 2018. "Person-Organization Fit, Person-Job Fit, and Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 389-402.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    culture of innovation; personal values; innovative values; employee initiative behavior; personal mechanisms of proactivity; self-leadership; self-directed learning; engagement.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:41-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.