IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v21y2020i2p96-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprises’ competitive behaviour assessment in industrial markets in manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya Yu. Yaroshevich

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

Under the stagnating economy and turbulence in global and national markets, coun tries face a thorny question of establishing the strategic priorities of the state policy and main taining sustainable growth of individual industrial companies. It is impossible to determine the parameters of the sustainable development strategy without the understanding of principles and specifics of competitive behaviour in industrial markets. The paper centres on the methodologi cal development and empirical assessment of enterprises’ competitive behaviour in industrial markets. The theoretical basis of the study includes the system approach enriched with the new empirical theory, the theory of strategic behaviour, theories of competition and several oth ers. The study of theoretical approaches to the definition of the concept “competitive behaviour” made it possible to identify the main parameters of its assessment, such as market structure, intensity of competition, development of differentiation and innovations. The suggested meth odological approach encompasses a consequent assessment of the intensity of competition with the use of the concentration and turbulence indicators and the analysis of the tightness of cor relation dependence between market shares and expenses related to commercial and innovative activities of industrial enterprises. The author takes eight industrial markets in Russia to test the developed approach. The findings reveal there are only four markets with an active com petitive behaviour, where enterprises take advantage of product differentiation and innovations. 110 Journal of New Economy 2020?•?Vol.?21?•?No.?2 Development of Industrial Markets and Enterprises According to Yudaev–Ramensky’s classification, in these industrial markets experent and vio lent strategies dominate. The suggested approach is universal and therefore, applicable to assess competitive behaviour in any industrial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya Yu. Yaroshevich, 2020. "Enterprises’ competitive behaviour assessment in industrial markets in manufacturing," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 96-111, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:21:y:2020:i:2:p:96-111
    DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-2-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/87/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/ru/2020/877
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-2-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald H. Coase, 2008. "The Institutional Structure of Production," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 2, pages 31-39, Springer.
    2. Baumol, William J, 1982. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Douglass C. North, 1990. "A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(4), pages 355-367, October.
    4. Vincent P. Crawford, 2016. "New Directions for Modelling Strategic Behavior: Game-Theoretic Models of Communication, Coordination, and Cooperation in Economic Relationships," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 131-150, Fall.
    5. Juan Ricardo Perilla Jimenez, 2019. "Mainstream and evolutionary views of technology, economic growth and catching up," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 823-852, July.
    6. Svetlana V. Orekhova & Yevgeny V. Kislitsyn, 2018. "Power Asymmetry and Economic Growth of Industrial Markets: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(4), pages 121-135, August.
    7. Engelbert J. Dockner & Steffen Jørgensen, 2018. "Strategic Rivalry for Market Share: A Contest Theory Approach to Dynamic Advertising Competition," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 468-489, September.
    8. Catherine Matraves & Laura Rondi, 2007. "Product Differentiation, Industry Concentration and Market Share Turbulence," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 37-57.
    9. Joseph E. Stiglitz & G. Frank Mathewson (ed.), 1986. "New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262690934, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brennan, Timothy J., 2000. "The Economics of Competition Policy: Recent Developments and Cautionary Notes in Antitrust and Regulation," Discussion Papers 10716, Resources for the Future.
    2. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.
    3. Trent J. MacDonald, 2019. "The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18871.
    4. Kresimir Zigic, 2001. "Strategic Trade Policy, Spillovers, and the Uncertain Mode of," Industrial Organization 0012008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Vahabi,Mehrdad, 2019. "The Political Economy of Predation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107591370.
    6. Jean J. Gabszewicz & Jacques-François Thisse, 2000. "Microeconomic theories of imperfect competition," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 37(1), pages 47-99.
    7. Martin Gaynor & Deborah Haas-Wilson, 1999. "Change, Consolidation, and Competition in Health Care Markets," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 141-164, Winter.
    8. Apostolos Ballas & Irene Fafaliou, 2008. "Market Shares and Concentration in the EU Auditing Industry: the Effects of Andersen’s Demise," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 14(4), pages 485-497, November.
    9. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Sven Hoeppner, 2014. "The unintended consequence of doorstep consumer protection: surprise, reciprocation, and consistency," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 247-276, October.
    11. Menard, Claude, 1995. "Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets? Disentangling some fundamental concepts," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 161-182, October.
    12. Panova, Anna A. (Панова, Анна), 2018. "Transaction Cost Theory: Origin and Development [Теория Трансакционнных Издержек: Логика Возникновения И Развития]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 90-107, August.
    13. Paech, Niko P., 1998. "Contestability reconsidered: The meaning of market exit costs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 435-443, March.
    14. Jean-Marc Siroën, 1993. "Marchés contestables, différenciation des produits et discrimination des prix," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(3), pages 569-592.
    15. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin, 2001. "Optimal timetables for public transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 789-813, September.
    16. O'Shea, Lucy & Ulph, Alistair, 2008. "The role of pest resistance in biotechnology R&D investment strategy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 213-228, March.
    17. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    18. Rita YI MAN LI, 2008. "Nature Of The Firm: A Study On Developers In China And Hong Kong," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 3(4(6)_Wint).
    19. Peter Kuhn, 1982. "Malfeasance in Long Term Employment Contracts: A New General Model with an Application to Unionism," NBER Working Papers 1045, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Shamsul Arifeen Khan Mamun, 2012. "Stochastic estimation of cost frontier: evidence from Bangladesh," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 211-227, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    industrial markets; competitive behaviour; competition; assessment of competitive behaviour; differentiation; innovations; expenses; correlation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:21:y:2020:i:2:p:96-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.