IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2019i1p270-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cluster Development Based on Competitive Specialization of Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Kolmakov

    (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics)

  • Aleksandra Polyakova

    (Institute of Social Analysis and Forecasting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • Svetlana Karpova

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation)

  • Alla Golovina

    (Ural State University of Economics)

Abstract

“Bottom-up†cluster identification, as opposed to “assigning†clusters by the fact of enterprises coexisting on a compact territory, is an important scientific and practical problem. Its solution may be found in a survey of regions’ competitive specialization in order to identify spatial clusters based on industries with high-level competitive potential. The data on gross regional product (GRP) and national gross value added across industries were an empirical basis of the study. This article explores the possibility to identify territorial clusters in a region where its competitive specialization meets the high competitive potential of an industry. Research methodology stands on regional and spatial economics theories, employs traditional economic instruments of results’ verification. To achieve the expected results we employed traditional instruments of verification, economic and statistical analysis as research methodology. Studying a wide range of literature sources have resulted into development of innovative industrial approach to cluster formation by identifying clustering priorities and industries’ integration potential. The approach is based on the assessment of regions’ industrial specialization that can measure industry’s contribution to regions competitiveness, as well as density of interregional competitive relations. Such assessment is useful in determining industries potentially attractive for clustering. These industries can generate positive effect from utilizing territory’s specialization. Obvious specialization will either indicate potential’s depletion or reveal vectors for developing the most competitive industries that actually create efficient clusters. This approach contributes sufficiently to the theory and methodology of cluster paradigm of social and economic development, as it allows identifying de-facto existing clusters instead of creating them artificially. The key principle of the method is prioritizing as a cluster an industry, which is characterized by maximum productivity in social and economic spheres. Considering the competition between regions and different levels of industry development, it is possible to identify perspective directions for advancing regions strategic competitiveness. Further research will be aimed at the method’s verification and expansion by analyzing prolonged retrospective of specific data, including the gravity components of the connectedness of regions economic space and network interactions effects between the participants of “artificial†and “natural†clusters in the Russian Federation.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Kolmakov & Aleksandra Polyakova & Svetlana Karpova & Alla Golovina, 2019. "Cluster Development Based on Competitive Specialization of Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 270-284.
  • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:270-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2019/March_2019/ERMarch2019_270_284.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Porter, 2003. "The Economic Performance of Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 549-578.
    2. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    4. Ellison, Glenn & Glaeser, Edward L, 1997. "Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(5), pages 889-927, October.
    5. Denis Grigorievich Perepelitsa & Olga Aleksandrovna Zhdanova, 2017. "Peculiarities of Investment Decision-making in the Oil and Gas Industry Aimed to Ensure Sustainable Growth of the Russian Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 216-223.
    6. Boush, G. D. & Kulikova, О. М. & Shelkov, I. К., 2016. "Agent modelling of cluster formation processes in regional economic systems," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 2(1), pages 89-101.
    7. Michael J. Enright, 2003. "Regional Clusters: What We Know and What We Should Know," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Johannes Bröcker & Dirk Dohse & Rüdiger Soltwedel (ed.), Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, chapter 6, pages 99-129, Springer.
    8. Ian R. Gordon & Philip McCann, 2000. "Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 513-532, March.
    9. Johannes Bröcker & Dirk Dohse & Rüdiger Soltwedel (ed.), 2003. "Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-540-24760-9, February.
    10. Galina Boush & Okxana Kulikova & Ivan Shelkov, 2016. "Agent Modelling of Cluster Formation Processes in Regional Economic Systems (p. 64-77)," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 64-77.
    11. Paul Benneworth & Nick Henry, 2004. "Where Is the Value Added in the Cluster Approach? Hermeneutic Theorising, Economic Geography and Clusters as a Multiperspectival Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 1011-1023, May.
    12. Harold (Hal) Wolman & Diana Hincapie, 2015. "Clusters and Cluster-Based Development Policy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(2), pages 135-149, May.
    13. Bresnahan, Timothy F & Gambardella, Alfonso & Saxenian, AnnaLee, 2001. "'Old Economy' Inputs for 'New Economy' Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(4), pages 835-860, December.
    14. Tatiana Grigorievna Bondarenko & Ekaterina Anatolievna Isaeva & Sergey Aleksandrovich Orekhov & Anzor Uvaysovich Soltakhanov, 2017. "Optimization of the Company Strategic Management System in the Context of Economic Instability," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 3-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A.G. Polyakova & M.P. Loginov & A.I. Serebrennikova & E.I. Thalassinos, 2019. "Design of a Socio-economic Processes Monitoring System Based on Network Analysis and Big Data," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 130-139.
    2. E.M. Akhmetshin & D.K. Dzhavatov & E.A. Sverdlikova & M.S. Sokolov & O.A. Avdeeva & G.P. Yavkin, 2018. "The Influence of Innovation on Social and Economic Development of the Russian Regions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 767-776.
    3. M.P. Loginov & E.E. Noeva & G.A. Volkovitckaia & A.A. Murinovich & A.I. Serebrennikova, 2018. "Competitiveness-based Typology of the Russian Regions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 787-796.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole Litzel & Joachim Möller, 2011. "Industrial Clusters and Economic Integration: Theoretic Concepts and an Application to the European Metropolitan Region Nuremberg," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume II, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Harold (Hal) Wolman & Diana Hincapie, 2015. "Clusters and Cluster-Based Development Policy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(2), pages 135-149, May.
    3. Sara Cruz & Aurora Teixeira, 2010. "The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies-Regional Science Debate," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1263-1288.
    4. Delgado, Mercedes & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2014. "Clusters, convergence, and economic performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1785-1799.
    5. Iammarino, Simona & McCann, Philip, 2006. "The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1018-1036, September.
    6. Miroslav ŽIŽKA & Natalie PELLONEOVÁ, 2019. "Do Clusters With Public Support Perform Better? Case Study Of Czech Cluster Organizations," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 20-33, December.
    7. Thomas G. Pittz & Rebecca White & Ted Zoller, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and social network centrality: the power of regional dealmakers," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1273-1286, April.
    8. Argentino Pessoa, 2014. "Agglomeration and regional growth policy: externalities versus comparative advantages," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(1), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Fischer, Bruno & Meissner, Dirk & Vonortas, Nicholas & Guerrero, Maribel, 2022. "Spatial features of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 27-36.
    10. Peng Wang & Xiaoyan Lin & Dajun Dai, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Agglomeration of Real-Estate Industry in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Gao, Ting, 2004. "Regional industrial growth: evidence from Chinese industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-124, January.
    12. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    13. Stephen J. Redding, 2010. "The Empirics Of New Economic Geography," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 297-311, February.
    14. Edward L. Glaeser, 1998. "Are Cities Dying?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 139-160, Spring.
    15. Alberto Franco Pozzolo, 2004. "Research and Development, Regional Spillovers and the Location of Economic Activities," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 72(4), pages 463-482, July.
    16. Mercedes Delgado & Michael E. Porter & Scott Stern, 2016. "Defining clusters of related industries," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38.
    17. Christian Fons-Rosen & Vincenzo Scrutinio & Katalin Szemeredi, 2016. "Colocation and knowledge diffusion: evidence from million dollar plants," CEP Discussion Papers dp1447, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    18. Cassandra C Wang & George C S Lin & Guicai Li, 2010. "Industrial Clustering and Technological Innovation in China: New Evidence from the ICT Industry in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(8), pages 1987-2010, August.
    19. Ovtchinnikov, Alexei V. & Pantaleoni, Eva, 2012. "Individual political contributions and firm performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 367-392.
    20. Barrios, Salvador & Bertinelli, Luisito & Strobl, Eric, 2006. "Coagglomeration and spillovers," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 467-481, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:270-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.