IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2017i3p764-776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Problems of Strategic Development of Tourism in the Regions of Russia (Case of the Krasnodar Region and the Resort City of Sochi)

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Sorokin

    (Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation)

  • Vladimir Sharafutdinov

    (Research and science center of Russian Academy of Science in Sochi)

  • Elena Onishchenko

    (Sochi research center, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of strategic development of tourism in the economy of the Russian regions. These problems arise in the period of transition from regulatory functions of the market to the management of long-term development based on the strategic objectives and flagship projects that can achieve these goals in practice. In such a case, the tourism sector of the regional economy is suggested to be considered not within the narrow framework of the tour operator and hotel business activity as it takes place in Russia, but on the much broader scale involving 50 branches of the modern economy as it is increasingly used worldwide. The authors’ hypothesis comes from the fact that in modern conditions, the development and implementation of the strategies of the recreation and tourism industries in the Russian regions can only be effective through the creation and promotion of large diversified knowledge-based competitive regional tourism products at new technological level. The paper clearly demonstrates the group methods of regional strategic planning such as brainstorming and foresight (forecasting and future shaping). The results of the research substantiate not only the need to amend the legislative framework and the current management system of the Russian tourism, to actively elaborate and implement the regional development strategies, to carry out tourism development studies aimed at its commercial success but also the importance of convincing representation of the civilizational advantages of the Russian world and Russian civilization through the tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Sorokin & Vladimir Sharafutdinov & Elena Onishchenko, 2017. "On the Problems of Strategic Development of Tourism in the Regions of Russia (Case of the Krasnodar Region and the Resort City of Sochi)," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 764-776.
  • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:3:p:764-776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/September_2017/ERSeptember2017_764_776.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Innes & David Booher & Sarah Di Vittorio, 2011. "Strategies for Megaregion Governance," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 55-67.
    2. Anne Lorentzen & Hugues Jeannerat, "undated". "Urban and regional studies in the experience economy: What kind of turn?," GRET Journal Papers 10-13, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    3. Rainer Andergassen & Guido Candela & Paolo Figini, 2017. "The management of tourism destinations," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 49-65, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Griffin, Greg Phillip & Jiao, Junfeng, 2019. "The Geography and Equity of Crowdsourced Public Participation for Active Transportation Planning," SocArXiv 9ghrn, Center for Open Science.
    2. Bhattarai, Kiran Kumari & Pant, Laxmi Prasad & FitzGibbon, John, 2020. "Contested governance of drinking water provisioning services in Nepal’s transboundary river basins," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    3. Judith Westerink & Annet Kempenaar & Marjo van Lierop & Stefan Groot & Arnold van der Valk & Adri van den Brink, 2017. "The participating government: Shifting boundaries in collaborative spatial planning of urban regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 147-168, February.
    4. Peter TY Cheung, 2015. "Toward collaborative governance between Hong Kong and Mainland China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1915-1933, August.
    5. Soyoung Kim & Woo-Je Kim & Richard Clark Feiock, 2021. "An Item Response Theory Model of Inter-Regional Collaboration for Transportation Planning in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Uroš Radosavljević & Aleksandra Đorđević & Kseniјa Lalović & Jelena Živković & Zoran Đukanović, 2019. "Nodes and Networks: The Generative Role of Cultural Heritage for Urban Revival in Kikinda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Terry van Dijk & Hiska Ubels, 2016. "How Dutch professionals conduct interactive design sessions to foster ‘shared understanding’," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(3), pages 464-479, May.
    8. Pang Qingyun & Zhang Mu, 2021. "Evolutionary game analysis of land income distribution in tourism development," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 670-687, June.
    9. Sciara , Gian-Claudia & Handy, Susan, 2013. "Cultivating Cooperation without Control: A Study of California’s MPO-Driven Smart Growth Programs," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1xq050ts, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Mutabdzija Goran, 2016. "Sarajevo-Romanija Region: A Fluid Space between the Rural and Urban," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(3), pages 296-303, September.
    11. Silvia Emili & Paolo Figini & Andrea Guizzardi, 2020. "Modelling international monthly tourism demand at the micro destination level with climate indicators and web-traffic data," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(7), pages 1129-1151, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:3:p:764-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.