IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v35y2017i1p147-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The participating government: Shifting boundaries in collaborative spatial planning of urban regions

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Westerink
  • Annet Kempenaar
  • Marjo van Lierop
  • Stefan Groot
  • Arnold van der Valk
  • Adri van den Brink

Abstract

This article identifies two alternative collaborative spatial planning discourses: a leading government with societal participation and self-governance by societal actors with government participation. It shows how the boundary between the roles of governments and societal actors in collaboration discourses is shifting, but also how both collaborative planning discourses exist alongside each other in two Dutch urban regions: Eindhoven Region and Parkstad Limburg. In both regions, these alternative discourses on role division in collaborative planning are similar, even though Eindhoven is a growing region in which the local and regional governments collaborate intensively with companies, and Parkstad Limburg is a shrinking region that more actively involves citizens. The article concludes with reflections on the need to manage boundaries in collaborative planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Westerink & Annet Kempenaar & Marjo van Lierop & Stefan Groot & Arnold van der Valk & Adri van den Brink, 2017. "The participating government: Shifting boundaries in collaborative spatial planning of urban regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 147-168, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:147-168
    DOI: 10.1177/0263774X16646770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263774X16646770
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0263774X16646770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gert-Jan Hospers, 2014. "Policy Responses to Urban Shrinkage: From Growth Thinking to Civic Engagement," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1507-1523, July.
    2. Henk-Jan Kooij & Kristof Van Assche & Arnoud Lagendijk, 2014. "Open Concepts as Crystallization Points and Enablers of Discursive Configurations: The Case of the Innovation Campus in the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 84-100, January.
    3. Annet Kempenaar & Marjo van Lierop & Judith Westerink & Arnold van der Valk & Adri van den Brink, 2016. "Change of Thought: Findings on Planning for Shrinkage from a Regional Design Competition," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 23-40, January.
    4. repec:ces:ifodic:v:1:y:2003:i:3:p:14567926 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Petra H Roodbol-Mekkes & Arnold J J van der Valk & Willem K Korthals Altes, 2012. "The Netherlands Spatial Planning Doctrine in Disarray in the 21st Century," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(2), pages 377-395, February.
    6. Thorsten Wiechmann & Marco Bontje, 2015. "Responding to Tough Times: Policy and Planning Strategies in Shrinking Cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Alan Greenspan, 2002. "Corporate governance," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(03), pages 3-6, October.
    8. Rigmar Osterkamp & Markus Eller, 2003. "Functional Decentralisation of Government Activity," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 1(03), pages 36-42, February.
    9. Helena Leino, 2012. "Boundary Interaction in Emerging Scenes: Two Participatory Planning Cases from Finland," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 383-396.
    10. Ostrom, Elinor, 1996. "Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1073-1087, June.
    11. Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado & Arie Romein, 2010. "The role of organisational capacity and knowledge-based development: the reinvention of Eindhoven," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 79-96.
    12. Rigmar Osterkamp & Markus Eller, 2003. "How Decentralised Is Government Activity?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 1(01), pages 32-35, February.
    13. Judith Innes & David Booher & Sarah Di Vittorio, 2011. "Strategies for Megaregion Governance," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 55-67.
    14. Rigmar Osterkamp & Markus Eller, 2003. "How Decentralised Is Government Activity?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 1(1), pages 32-35, 02.
    15. Vanessa Watson, 2014. "Co-production and collaboration in planning - The difference," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 62-76, March.
    16. Maarten Hajer & Wil Zonneveld, 2000. "Spatial Planning in the Network Society-Rethinking the Principles of Planning in the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 337-355, June.
    17. repec:ces:ifodic:v:1:y:2003:i:1:p:14567833 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilaria Zambon & Pere Serra & Silvia Pili & Vincenzo Bernardini & Carlotta Ferrara & Luca Salvati, 2018. "A New Approach to Land-Use Structure: Patch Perimeter Metrics as a Spatial Analysis Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andy Gouldson & Rory Sullivan, 2014. "Understanding the Governance of Corporations: An Examination of the Factors Shaping UK Supermarket Strategies on Climate Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2972-2990, December.
    2. Francesco Ramella, 2010. "Negotiating Local Development: The Italian Experience of ‘Territorial Pacts’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(3), pages 512-527, June.
    3. Athaulla A Rasheed, 2020. "Framing Metagovernance in the Context of Developing Democracies: An Institutionalist Viewpoint," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 91111-91111, December.
    4. Alejandro Lara & Felipe Bucci & Cristobal Palma & Juan Munizaga & Victor Montre-Águila, 2021. "Development, urban planning and political decisions. A triad that built territories at risk," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1935-1957, November.
    5. Harriet Bulkeley & Andy Jordan, 2012. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(4), pages 556-570, August.
    6. Jan Janosch Förster & Linda Downsborough & Lisa Biber-Freudenberger & Girma Kelboro Mensuro & Jan Börner, 2021. "Exploring criteria for transformative policy capacity in the context of South Africa’s biodiversity economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 209-237, March.
    7. Daria Gritsenko & Matthew Wood, 2022. "Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 45-62, January.
    8. Franco-Torres, Manuel & Kvålshaugen, Ragnhild & Ugarelli, Rita M., 2021. "Understanding the governance of urban water services from an institutional logics perspective," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Dwi Amalia Sari & Chris Margules & Han She Lim & Jeffrey A. Sayer & Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono & Colin J. Macgregor & Allan P. Dale & Elizabeth Poon, 2022. "Performance Auditing to Assess the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Juan Yan & Marietta Haffner & Marja Elsinga, 2021. "Inclusionary Housing: An Evaluation of a New Public Rental Housing Governance Instrument in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Lange, Marcus & Cummins, Valerie, 2021. "Managing stakeholder perception and engagement for marine energy transitions in a decarbonising world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Antoinette Laurent & Cécile Chanut-Guieu & Vincent Lhuillier, 2013. "Diversité des opérateurs et gouvernance locale de la petite enfance : quels enjeux pour le développement des territoires, les modes d'organisation des acteurs et la régulation de la qualité ?," Working Papers hal-02958290, HAL.
    13. Andrew Jordan & Rüdiger K. W. Wurzel & Anthony Zito, 2005. "The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(3), pages 477-496, October.
    14. Kooper, M.N. & Maes, R. & Lindgreen, E.E.O. Roos, 2011. "On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 195-200.
    15. Rolien Willmes & Margit van Wessel, 2021. "The Construction of (Non-)Responsibility in Governance Networks," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    16. Emmanuel Mogende & Oluwatoyin Kolawole, 2016. "Dynamics of local governance in natural resource conservation in the Okavango Delta, Botswana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(3), pages 93-102, August.
    17. Christopher Nathan & Keith Hyams, 2022. "Global policymakers and catastrophic risk," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 3-21, March.
    18. Stefan Greiving & Dietwald Gruehn & Christa Reicher, 2022. "The Rhenish Coal-Mining Area—Assessing the Transformational Talents and Challenges of a Region in Fundamental Structural Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Smith, Göran & Hensher, David A., 2020. "Towards a framework for Mobility-as-a-Service policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 54-65.
    20. Laura Ripoll González & Fred Gale, 2020. "Place Branding as Participatory Governance? An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Tasmania, Australia," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:35:y:2017:i:1:p:147-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.