IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlawec/v29y1986i1p29-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Consequences of the OSHA Cotton Dust Standards: An Analysis of Stock Price Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes, John S
  • Magat, Wesley A
  • Ricks, William E

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, John S & Magat, Wesley A & Ricks, William E, 1986. "The Economic Consequences of the OSHA Cotton Dust Standards: An Analysis of Stock Price Behavior," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 29-59, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:29:y:1986:i:1:p:29-59
    DOI: 10.1086/467108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467108
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/467108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carl Hampus Lyttkens, 1993. "Monitoring health in Sweden: On the rationale for working environment regulations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 323-332, December.
    2. Stefanie Ann Lenway & Douglas A. Schuler, 1991. "The Determinants of Corporate Political Involvement in Trade Protection: The Case of the Steel Industry," NBER Chapters, in: Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy, pages 75-112, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Lisa Baudot & Zhongwei Huang & Dana Wallace, 2021. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Risk in Mandatory Corporate Responsibility Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 151-174, August.
    4. Stavins, Robert & Keohane, Nathaniel & Revesz, Richard, 1997. "The Positive Political Economy of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," RFF Working Paper Series dp-97-25, Resources for the Future.
    5. Ippolito, Pauline M & Overstreet, Thomas R, Jr, 1996. "Resale Price Maintenance: An Economic Assessment of the Federal Trade Commission's Case against the Corning Glass Works," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(1), pages 285-328, April.
    6. Ehsan H. Feroz & Raymond Raab & Stephen Haag, 2001. "An Income Efficiency Model Approach to the Economic Consequences of Osha Cotton Dust Regulation," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 26(1), pages 69-89, June.
    7. Harold Mulherin, J., 2007. "Measuring the costs and benefits of regulation: Conceptual issues in securities markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 421-437, June.
    8. Minna Halme & Jyrki Niskanen, 2001. "Does corporate environmental protection increase or decrease shareholder value? The case of environmental investments," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(4), pages 200-214, July.
    9. Scott M. Fuess, Jr., 1991. "The Impact of Safety and Health Legislation on Union Effectiveness," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 417-423, Oct-Dec.
    10. Mark S. Johnson & Ron C. Mittelhammer & Don P. Blayney, 1992. "Pesticide industry regulation: Economic consequences as revealed through stock price behavior," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 347-364.
    11. Timothy H. Mills & Clyde L. Posey & Dwight C. Anderson, 1994. "Stock Market Reactions To the Tax Reform Act of 1986: an Analysis of the Agribusiness Industry," Public Finance Review, , vol. 22(2), pages 222-238, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlawec:v:29:y:1986:i:1:p:29-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.