IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v44y2012i11p932-948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum inspection interval for a system under periodic and opportunistic inspections

Author

Listed:
  • Sharareh Taghipour
  • Dragan Banjevic

Abstract

This article proposes a model to find an optimal periodic inspection interval over a finite time horizon for a multi-component system. The system’s components are subject to either hard or soft failures. Hard failures are detected and fixed instantaneously. Soft failures are unrevealed and can only be detected at inspections. Soft failures do not stop the system from operating; however, they may reduce its level of performance from its designed value. The system is inspected periodically to detect soft failures; however, a hard failure instance also provides an opportunity called opportunistic inspection to inspect and fix soft failures. Two models are discussed in this article. The first model assumes that components with soft and hard failures are minimally repaired. The second model assumes the possibility of either minimal repair or replacement of a component with soft failure, with some age-dependent probabilities. Recursive procedures are developed to calculate the expected number of minimal repairs and replacements and expected downtimes of components with soft failure. Examples of the calculation of the optimal inspection intervals are given. The data used in the examples are adapted from a hospital’s maintenance data for general infusion pump.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharareh Taghipour & Dragan Banjevic, 2012. "Optimum inspection interval for a system under periodic and opportunistic inspections," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(11), pages 932-948.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:44:y:2012:i:11:p:932-948
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2011.618176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2011.618176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2011.618176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2016. "A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-104.
    2. Si, Guojin & Xia, Tangbin & Zhu, Ying & Du, Shichang & Xi, Lifeng, 2019. "Triple-level opportunistic maintenance policy for leasehold service network of multi-location production lines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Qingan Qiu & Lirong Cui & Dejing Kong, 2019. "Availability and maintenance modeling for a two-component system with dependent failures over a finite time horizon," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 200-210, April.
    4. Alotaibi, Naif M. & Scarf, Philip & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Lopes, Rodrigo S. & de Oliveira e Silva, André Luiz & Rodrigues, Augusto J.S. & Alyami, Salem A., 2023. "Modified-opportunistic inspection and the case of remote, groundwater well-heads," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Ye, Zhenggeng & Cai, Zhiqiang & Yang, Hui & Si, Shubin & Zhou, Fuli, 2023. "Joint optimization of maintenance and quality inspection for manufacturing networks based on deep reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2017. "A study of postponed replacement in a delay time model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 70-79.
    7. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2015. "Optimal loading of system with random repair time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 137-143.
    8. Bjarnason, Erik T.S. & Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan, 2014. "Joint optimal inspection and inventory for a k-out-of-n system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 203-215.
    9. Seyedhosseini, Seyed Mohammad & Moakedi, Hamid & Shahanaghi, Kamran, 2018. "Imperfect inspection optimization for a two-component system subject to hidden and two-stage revealed failures over a finite time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 141-156.
    10. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    11. Peng, Rui & Liu, Bin & Zhai, Qingqing & Wang, Wenbin, 2019. "Optimal maintenance strategy for systems with two failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 624-632.
    12. Zhang, Fengxia & Liao, Haitao & Shen, Jingyuan & Ma, Yizhong, 2024. "Optimal maintenance over a finite time horizon for a system under imperfect inspection and dynamic working environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    14. Shen, Jingyuan & Hu, Jiawen & Ma, Yizhong, 2020. "Two preventive replacement strategies for systems with protective auxiliary parts subject to degradation and economic dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2015. "Optimal backup frequency in system with random repair time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 12-22.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:44:y:2012:i:11:p:932-948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.