IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i10p2752-2763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of worker sequence on cycle time in a U-shaped line with chase mode

Author

Listed:
  • Koichi Nakade

Abstract

In this paper, a U-shaped line with multiple machines is considered, where each of multiple heterogeneous workers is allocated to one of machines as his/her starting position along the line. The chase mode is assumed, in which workers deal with all tasks and walk around on the same route. Periodicity of cycle time of a U-shaped line in chase mode is discussed, where periodicity means that time necessary for each worker to walk around is cyclic and depends on the order of worker’s sequence. When it is periodic, the overall cycle time on the output of products becomes greater than the fundamental cycle time of the system, which is the maximum among total task times on workers and machines divided by the number of workers. It is shown that if there are just two workers then there is no periodicity of cycle time. Examples for three worker case show that the order of workers on the line sometimes highly influences on the length and periodicity of cycle time. The sufficient conditions under which there is no periodicity are derived for three or more worker cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Koichi Nakade, 2017. "Effect of worker sequence on cycle time in a U-shaped line with chase mode," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(10), pages 2752-2763, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:10:p:2752-2763
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1190472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1190472
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1190472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emil Zavadlav & John O. McClain & L. Joseph Thomas, 1996. "Self-Buffering, Self-Balancing, Self-Flushing Production Lines," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(8), pages 1151-1164, August.
    2. Nakade, Koichi & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 2003. "Separate and carousel type allocations of workers in a U-shaped production line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 403-424, March.
    3. Nakade, Koichi & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 1999. "An optimal worker allocation problem for a U-shaped production line," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 353-358, April.
    4. John J. Bartholdi & Leonid A. Bunimovich & Donald D. Eisenstein, 1999. "Dynamics of Two- and Three-Worker “Bucket Brigade” Production Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 488-491, June.
    5. G. J. Miltenburg & J. Wijngaard, 1994. "The U-line Line Balancing Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(10), pages 1378-1388, October.
    6. Armbruster, Dieter & Gel, Esma S., 2006. "Bucket brigades revisited: Are they always effective?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 213-229, July.
    7. John J. Bartholdi & Donald D. Eisenstein, 1996. "A Production Line that Balances Itself," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 21-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin Chen & ShiLong Liao & ZhongZhen Wu & ShuPing Yi, 2016. "Comparative analysis of the performance of a novel U-shaped ‘chasing-overtaking’ production line," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3677-3690, June.
    2. Nakade, Koichi & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 2003. "Separate and carousel type allocations of workers in a U-shaped production line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 403-424, March.
    3. Suresh Chand & Ting Zeng, 2001. "A Comparison of U-Line and Straight-Line Performances Under Stochastic Task Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 138-150, January.
    4. Yun Fong Lim, 2011. "TECHNICAL NOTE---Cellular Bucket Brigades," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1539-1545, December.
    5. Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Erel, Erdal & Alp, Arda, 2009. "Ant colony optimization for the single model U-type assembly line balancing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 287-300, August.
    6. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2001. "Server Assignment Policies for Maximizing the Steady-State Throughput of Finite Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1421-1439, October.
    7. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2008. "A versatile algorithm for assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(1), pages 39-56, January.
    8. Wallace J. Hopp & Eylem Tekin & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2004. "Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 83-98, January.
    9. Gregory Dobson & Tolga Tezcan & Vera Tilson, 2013. "Optimal Workflow Decisions for Investigators in Systems with Interruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1125-1141, May.
    10. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2007. "Compensating for Failures with Flexible Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 753-768, August.
    11. Miltenburg, John, 2001. "U-shaped production lines: A review of theory and practice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 201-214, April.
    12. S.M.R. Iravani & J.A. Buzacott & M.J.M. Posner, 2005. "A robust policy for serial agile production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(1), pages 58-73, February.
    13. Hong, Soondo & Johnson, Andrew L. & Peters, Brett A., 2015. "Quantifying picker blocking in a bucket brigade order picking system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 862-873.
    14. Sikora, Celso Gustavo Stall & Lopes, Thiago Cantos & Magatão, Leandro, 2017. "Traveling worker assembly line (re)balancing problem: Model, reduction techniques, and real case studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 949-971.
    15. Peng Wang & Kai Pan & Zhenzhen Yan & Yun Fong Lim, 2022. "Managing Stochastic Bucket Brigades on Discrete Work Stations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 358-373, January.
    16. Eylem Tekin & Wallace J. Hopp & Mark P. Van Oyen, 2002. "Benefits of Skill Chaining in Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers: An Extended Abstract," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 17-20.
    17. Vercellis, Carlo, 1999. "Multi-plant production planning in capacitated self-configuring two-stage serial systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 451-460, December.
    18. John O. McClain & Kenneth L. Schultz & L. Joseph Thomas, 2000. "Management of Worksharing Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 49-67, July.
    19. John J. Bartholdi & Leonid A. Bunimovich & Donald D. Eisenstein, 1999. "Dynamics of Two- and Three-Worker “Bucket Brigade” Production Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 488-491, June.
    20. Sennott, Linn I. & Van Oyen, Mark P. & Iravani, Seyed M.R., 2006. "Optimal dynamic assignment of a flexible worker on an open production line with specialists," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 541-566, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:10:p:2752-2763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.