IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjomxx/v13y2017i2p955-960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioclimates of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Pesaresi
  • Edoardo Biondi
  • Simona Casavecchia

Abstract

The Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System according to Rivas-Martínez (WBCS) is a bioclimatic classification that is widely used in vegetation science, geobotany, and landscape ecology. To date, only one complete WBCS map has been produced for Italy at the national scale. Here, we define two major updates to the WBCS map of Italy: improvements to the surface spatial accuracy for the climate, especially for precipitation; and detailed mapping of the Submediterraneity Index and its levels, which mainly characterize the ecotone area between the Mediterranean and the Temperate macrobioclimates. Finally, all WBCS units (i.e. macrobioclimates, bioclimatic variants, bioclimates, continentality types, bioclimatic belts) and the Submediterraneity Index are mapped on a scale of 1:2,500,000. These maps and the bioclimatic indices and monthly climatic surfaces are available here as raster data-sets (resolution, 900 m) and are useful for accurate bioclimatic diagnosis for the entire Italian territory. They will also support vegetation–environment relationship analysis, ecological modeling, and applied studies of climate change at the national scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Pesaresi & Edoardo Biondi & Simona Casavecchia, 2017. "Bioclimates of Italy," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 955-960, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:955-960
    DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2017.1413017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17445647.2017.1413017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17445647.2017.1413017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simone Pesaresi & Diana Galdenzi & Edoardo Biondi & Simona Casavecchia, 2014. "Bioclimate of Italy: application of the worldwide bioclimatic classification system," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 538-553, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carla Ippoliti & Luca Candeloro & Marius Gilbert & Maria Goffredo & Giuseppe Mancini & Gabriele Curci & Serena Falasca & Susanna Tora & Alessio Di Lorenzo & Michela Quaglia & Annamaria Conte, 2019. "Defining ecological regions in Italy based on a multivariate clustering approach: A first step towards a targeted vector borne disease surveillance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Bazzato, Erika & Rosati, Leonardo & Canu, Simona & Fiori, Michele & Farris, Emmanuele & Marignani, Michela, 2021. "High spatial resolution bioclimatic variables to support ecological modelling in a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentina Lucia Astrid Laface & Carmelo Maria Musarella & Gianmarco Tavilla & Agostino Sorgonà & Ana Cano-Ortiz & Ricardo Quinto Canas & Giovanni Spampinato, 2023. "Current and Potential Future Distribution of Endemic Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Pietro Salvaneschi & Antonio Pica & Ciro Apollonio & Teodoro Andrisano & Massimo Pecci & Andrea Petroselli & Bartolomeo Schirone, 2024. "Assessing the Efficiency of Two Silvicultural Approaches for Soil Erosion Mitigation Using a Novel Monitoring Apparatus," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Maria Luisa Lopez Fernandez & Dauren Zhumabayev & Ricardo Marco Garcia & Kanat Baigarin & Maria Soledad Lopez Fernandez & Saken Baisholanov, 2020. "Assessment of bioclimatic change in Kazakhstan, end 20th—middle 21st centuries, according to the PRECIS prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-37, October.
    4. Valentina Lucia Astrid Laface & Carmelo Maria Musarella & Agostino Sorgonà & Giovanni Spampinato, 2022. "Analysis of the Population Structure and Dynamic of Endemic Salvia ceratophylloides Ard. (Lamiaceae)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Maria Carla de Francesco & Francesco Pio Tozzi & Gabriella Buffa & Edy Fantinato & Michele Innangi & Angela Stanisci, 2022. "Identifying Critical Thresholds in the Impacts of Invasive Alien Plants and Dune Paths on Native Coastal Dune Vegetation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Giulia Caneva & Simone Langone & Flavia Bartoli & Adele Cecchini & Carlo Meneghini, 2021. "Vegetation Cover and Tumuli’s Shape as Affecting Factors of Microclimate and Biodeterioration Risk for the Conservation of Etruscan Tombs (Tarquinia, Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Francesco Ferretti & Marcello Corazza & Ilaria Campana & Venusta Pietrocini & Claudia Brunetti & Davide Scornavacca & Sandro Lovari, 2015. "Competition between wild herbivores: reintroduced red deer and Apennine chamois," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 550-559.
    8. Bazzato, Erika & Rosati, Leonardo & Canu, Simona & Fiori, Michele & Farris, Emmanuele & Marignani, Michela, 2021. "High spatial resolution bioclimatic variables to support ecological modelling in a Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    9. Gemma Chiaffarelli & Nicolò Sgalippa & Ilda Vagge, 2024. "The Landscape Ecological Quality of Two Different Farm Management Models: Polyculture Agroforestry vs. Conventional," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjomxx:v:13:y:2017:i:2:p:955-960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjom20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.