IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v35y2015i15-16p826-845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformative service networks: cocreated value as well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Hulda G. Black
  • Andrew S. Gallan

Abstract

Fundamental to emerging theories of value cocreation is a developing awareness that value emerges in networks. Service networks form to address issues for those in need, and value is conceived differently by the various constituents in the network. To represent this reality, a core service interaction, the reason for the construction of the network, is evaluated based upon a typology of value-creating interaction styles. Next, the potential impact on transformative value cocreation of various relationships in a service network is explored. To illustrate value cocreation from a network perspective, this paper develops research propositions assessing cocreated value in a health service network. Network factors regarding the structural and relationship properties of networks that advance the theory of value cocreation are proposed. Finally, suggestions for managers include ways to engage service network entities to enhance communication to foster a balanced, mutualistic relationship that optimizes cocreated value. Organizations need to better identify and activate customers' support networks in order to facilitate enhanced collaboration and communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Hulda G. Black & Andrew S. Gallan, 2015. "Transformative service networks: cocreated value as well-being," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(15-16), pages 826-845, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:35:y:2015:i:15-16:p:826-845
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2015.1090978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2015.1090978
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2015.1090978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dolan, Paul & Layard, Richard & Metcalfe, Robert, 2011. "Measuring subjective well-being for public policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35420, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sudbury-Riley, Lynn & Hunter-Jones, Philippa, 2021. "Facilitating inter-professional integration in palliative care: A service ecosystem perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Linda D. Hollebeek & Moira K. Clark & Wafa Hammedi & René Arvola, 2021. "Cocreated brand value: theoretical model and propositions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 413-428, July.
    3. Vieira, Alessandro Diogo & Leite, Higor & Volochtchuk, Ana Vitória Lachowski, 2022. "The impact of voice assistant home devices on people with disabilities: A longitudinal study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    4. Le Nguyen Hau & Pham Ngoc Tram Anh & Pham Ngoc Thuy, 2017. "The effects of interaction behaviors of service frontliners on customer participation in the value co-creation: a study of health care service," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 253-277, June.
    5. Temerak, M.S. & Winklhofer, H. & Hibbert, S.A., 2018. "Facilitating customer adherence to complex services through multi-interface interactions: The case of a weight loss service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 265-276.
    6. Andrew S. Gallan & Anu Helkkula, 2022. "Cocreating transformative value propositions with customers experiencing vulnerability during humanitarian crises," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 85-101, June.
    7. Valtteri Kaartemo & Helena Känsäkoski, 2018. "Information and Knowledge Processes in Health Care Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, December.
    8. Alessia Anzivino & Marta Galli & Roberta Sebastiani, 2021. "Addressing Tensions and Paradoxes in Sustainable Wine Industry: The Case of the Association “Le Donne Del Vino”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Finsterwalder, Jörg & Kuppelwieser, Volker G., 2020. "Intentionality and transformative services: Wellbeing co-creation and spill-over effects," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Danaher, Tracey S. & Gallan, Andrew S. & Orsingher, Chiara & Lervik-Olsen, Line & Verma, Rohit, 2017. "How do you feel today? Managing patient emotions during health care experiences to enhance well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 247-259.
    11. Léa Cauchard, 2021. "Quand le numérique crée une expérience de vulnérabilité : l’apport de la Théorie du Care," Post-Print hal-03544583, HAL.
    12. Yu Zhou & Shanshan Shi & Shaohua Wang, 2022. "A Multi-Agent Model-Based Evolutionary Model of Port Service Value Network and Decision Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Le Nguyen Hau, 2019. "The role of customer operant resources in health care value creation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 457-478, September.
    14. Vo Thi Ngoc Thuy & Hoang Doan Phuong Thao, 2017. "Impact of students’ experiences on brand image perception: the case of Vietnamese higher education," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(2), pages 217-251, June.
    15. Zhang, Yu & Su, Jiafu & Guo, Honggui & Lee, Jeoung Yul & Xiao, Yan & Fu, Mingqiu, 2022. "Transformative value co-creation with older customers in e-services: Exploring the influence of customer participation on appreciation of digital affordances and well-being," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Cheung, Lilliemay & Coote, Leonard V., 2020. "Tensions and trade-offs in multi-actor service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 655-666.
    17. Parsons, Elizabeth & Kearney, Treasa & Surman, Emma & Cappellini, Benedetta & Moffat, Sue & Harman, Vicki & Scheurenbrand, Klara, 2021. "Who really cares? Introducing an ‘Ethics of Care’ to debates on transformative value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 794-804.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Małgorzata W Kożusznik & José M Peiró & Aida Soriano, 2019. "Daily eudaimonic well-being as a predictor of daily performance: A dynamic lens," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Orla Doyle & Liam Delaney & Christine O'Farrelly & Nick Fitzpatrick & Michael Daly, 2015. "Can Early Intervention Improve Maternal Well-being? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," Working Papers 2015-015, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    3. Christopher Mackie & Conal Smith, 2015. "Conceptualizing Subjective Well-Being And Its Many Dimensions – Implications For Data Collection In Official Statistics And For Policy Relevance," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 335-372, September.
    4. Andrés Mauricio Vargas Pérez, 2013. "Bienestar subjetivo y políticas públicas de los gobiernos locales," Revista de Economía del Caribe 14755, Universidad del Norte.
    5. Barrington-Leigh, C.P., 2024. "The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    6. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2014. "Culture, entrepreneurship and uneven development: a spatial analysis," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(9-10), pages 726-752, December.
    7. Galiani, Sebastián & Gertler, Paul J. & Undurraga, Raimundo & Cooper, Ryan & Martínez, Sebastián & Ross, Adam, 2017. "Shelter from the storm: Upgrading housing infrastructure in Latin American slums," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 187-213.
    8. Paul Downward & Peter Dawson, 2016. "Is it Pleasure or Health from Leisure that We Benefit from Most? An Analysis of Well-Being Alternatives and Implications for Policy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 443-465, March.
    9. Ferreira, Susana & Akay, Alpaslan & Brereton, Finbarr & Cuñado, Juncal & Martinsson, Peter & Moro, Mirko & Ningal, Tine F., 2013. "Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Kroesen, Maarten, 2022. "Working from home during the corona-crisis is associated with higher subjective well-being for women with long (pre-corona) commutes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 14-23.
    11. Paul Dolan & Georgios Kavetsos, 2012. "Happy Talk: Mode of Administration Effects on Subjective Well-Being," CEP Discussion Papers dp1159, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. Yonas Alem & Jonathan Colmer, 2015. "Consumption Smoothing and the Welfare Cost of Uncertainty," STICERD - Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers Series 059, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    13. Li, Wenchao, 2021. "The “miseries” of sex imbalance: Evidence using subjective well-being data," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. J. Haavard Maridal, 2017. "A Worldwide Measure of Societal Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 1-38, October.
    15. Moschion, Julie & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2018. "The welfare implications of addictive substances: A longitudinal study of life satisfaction of drug users," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 206-221.
    16. Dolan, Paul & Kavetsos, Georgios & Tsuchiya, Aki, 2013. "Sick but satisfied: The impact of life and health satisfaction on choice between health scenarios," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 708-714.
    17. Heinz Welsch & Jan Kühling, 2016. "How Has The Crisis Of 2008–09 Affected Subjective Well-Being? Evidence From 25 Oecd Countries," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 34-54, January.
    18. Jiayuan Li & John Raine, 2014. "The Time Trend of Life Satisfaction in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 409-427, April.
    19. Itismita Mohanty & Robert Tanton & Yogi Vidyattama & Marcia Keegan & Robert Cummins, 2013. "‘Small area estimates of Subjective Wellbeing: Spatial Microsimulation on the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index Survey’," NATSEM Working Paper Series 13/23, University of Canberra, National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling.
    20. Alina Palimaru & Ron D. Hays, 2017. "Associations of Health-Related Quality of Life with Overall Quality of Life in the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Project," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 241-250, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:35:y:2015:i:15-16:p:826-845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.