IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v22y2020i2p161-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Re)defining public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the new public governance (NPG) paradigm: an institutional maturity perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Carter B. Casady
  • Kent Eriksson
  • Raymond E. Levitt
  • W. Richard Scott

Abstract

Infrastructure public-private partnerships (PPPs) are dominantly seen as part of an increasingly fragmented and uncertain public management paradigm known as New Public Governance (NPG). However, the effects of institutional maturity on PPP utilization within this domain remain understudied. In order to (re)define PPPs within the NPG paradigm, we develop a PPP institutional maturity model based on three institutional capabilities-legitimacy, trust, and capacity. We then use the U.S. PPP market as a case example to explore how the maturity of PPPs in an institutional setting depends on legitimacy, trust, and capacity in the PPP model.

Suggested Citation

  • Carter B. Casady & Kent Eriksson & Raymond E. Levitt & W. Richard Scott, 2020. "(Re)defining public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the new public governance (NPG) paradigm: an institutional maturity perspective," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 161-183, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:22:y:2020:i:2:p:161-183
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1577909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577909
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Baxter & Carter B. Casady, 2020. "Proactive and Strategic Healthcare Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the Coronavirus (Covid-19) Epoch," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Lei Yang & Longji Hu & Yifan Li, 2024. "Institutional Environment, Institutional Arrangements, and Risk Identification and Allocation in Public–Private Partnerships: A Multilevel Model Analysis Based on Data from 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Kędra Arleta, 2021. "Evaluation of the Perception of Universities’ Role in the Public Procurement Market," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 82-90, March.
    5. Canelas, Patricia & Alves, Sonia, 2024. "The governance of affordable housing through public-private partnerships: Critical entanglements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Pedrini, Giulio & Cappiello, Giuseppe, 2022. "The impact of training on labour productivity in the European utilities sector: An empirical analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Madeleine Hoeft & Marianne Pieper & Kent Eriksson & Hans-Joachim Bargstädt, 2021. "Toward Life Cycle Sustainability in Infrastructure: The Role of Automation and Robotics in PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Vu Minh Ngo & Huan Huu Nguyen & Hiep Cong Pham & Long Hoang Nguyen, 2024. "Engage or retreat? Exploring the determinants of participation in Climate Finance public-private partnerships," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(7), pages 1-30, July.
    9. Dan Pan & Huan Chen & Guzhen Zhou & Fanbin Kong, 2020. "Determinants of Public-Private Partnership Adoption in Solid Waste Management in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Rehema Msulwa, 2022. "How do megaprojects influence institutional change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 302-321.
    11. David Baxter & Carter B. Casady, 2020. "A Coronavirus (COVID-19) Triage Framework for (Sub)National Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-7, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:22:y:2020:i:2:p:161-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.