IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v20y2018i8p1145-1164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contract stability in European road infrastructure PPPs: how does governmental PPP support contribute to preventing contract renegotiation?

Author

Listed:
  • Raden Murwantara Soecipto
  • Koen Verhoest

Abstract

In the last decade a considerable number of PPP contracts in Europe turned out to be instable and were renegotiated. This paper studies which combinations of conditions in terms of macro-level business environment and governmental PPP support and at project-level (remuneration scheme, risk allocation, project age and contract duration) contribute to avoid contract renegotiation, by conducting a qualitative comparative analysis of twenty five European road infrastructure projects. Results show that although the broader macro-level business environment has a clear contribution, contract stability can benefit from an availability-based remuneration scheme and a well-developed governmental PPP support in combination with other conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Raden Murwantara Soecipto & Koen Verhoest, 2018. "Contract stability in European road infrastructure PPPs: how does governmental PPP support contribute to preventing contract renegotiation?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1145-1164, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:8:p:1145-1164
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1428414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2018.1428414
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2018.1428414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Athena Roumboutsos & Alenka Temeljotov-Salaj & Iosif Karousos, 2020. "Indicators for Sustainable Demand Risk Allocation in Transport Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Lei Yang & Longji Hu & Yifan Li, 2024. "Institutional Environment, Institutional Arrangements, and Risk Identification and Allocation in Public–Private Partnerships: A Multilevel Model Analysis Based on Data from 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Binchao Deng & Dongjie Zhou & Jiachen Zhao & Yilin Yin & Xiaoyu Li, 2021. "Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of the Critical Success Factors for the Sustainability of Public Private Partnership Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Jeffrey Kouton & Wilfried Sanogo & Nandi Djomgoue, 2023. "Risk allocation in energy infrastructure PPPs projects in selected African countries: does institutional quality, PPPs experience and income level make a difference?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 537-580, February.
    5. Joshua Steinfeld & Ron Carlee & Kouliga Koala, 2020. "DBFOM Contracting and Public Stewardship in the Norfolk-Portsmouth Elizabeth River Tunnels Public-Private Partnership," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-62, March.
    6. Bundgaard, Lasse & Borrás, Susana, 2021. "City-wide scale-up of smart city pilot projects: Governance conditions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Dan Pan & Huan Chen & Guzhen Zhou & Fanbin Kong, 2020. "Determinants of Public-Private Partnership Adoption in Solid Waste Management in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Rehema Msulwa, 2022. "How do megaprojects influence institutional change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 302-321.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:8:p:1145-1164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.