IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v14y2013i2p158-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Friendly

Abstract

In Brazil, a country notorious for its spatially segregated, unequal cities, a 2001 federal law recognizes the "right to the city" and mandates participation in planning processes, aiming to achieve social justice. Planning theory has dealt extensively with the "right to the city", but critical examination of the implementation of this law - the Statute of the City - is lacking. Drawing on the ideals of Lefebvre and the global "right to the city" movement, I contribute to the theoretical debate on the right to the city, connecting this discussion to an analysis of the practice of applying this ideal in Brazil. I examine the challenges of implementing this innovative policy in Niterói (Rio de Janeiro State), showing that a more nuanced approach is needed to understand Brazil's unique right to the city experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Friendly, 2013. "The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 158-179, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:14:y:2013:i:2:p:158-179
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2013.783098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2013.783098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2013.783098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abigail Friendly & Kristine Stiphany, 2019. "Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 271-287, February.
    2. Verlinghieri, Ersilia & Venturini, Federico, 2018. "Exploring the right to mobility through the 2013 mobilizations in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 126-136.
    3. Friendly, Abigail, 2020. "Sharing the unearned increment: Divergent Outcomes in Toronto and São Paulo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Topaloglou Lefteris, 2020. "Spatial (in)justice and place-based strategies in innovation ecosystems: the case of the Alexander Innovation Zone in Thessaloniki," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 49(49), pages 81-92, September.
    5. Abdillah, Kiky Kirina & Abdul Manaf, Azima & Awang, Abd Hair, 2022. "Land tenure security for low-income residents' urban livelihoods: A human development approach review of temporary occupation license," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Abigail Friendly & Ana Paula Pimentel Walker, 2022. "Legacy participation and the buried history of racialised spaces: Hypermodern revitalisation in Rio de Janeiro’s port area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1167-1184, May.
    7. Ondetti, Gabriel, 2024. "Diffusion without Implementation: The social function of property in Latin America," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Evandro Gonzalez Lima & Christine Kowal Chinelli & Andre Luis Azevedo Guedes & Elaine Garrido Vazquez & Ahmed W. A. Hammad & Assed Naked Haddad & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2020. "Smart and Sustainable Cities: The Main Guidelines of City Statute for Increasing the Intelligence of Brazilian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Khandakar Farid Uddin & Awais Piracha, 2023. "Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:14:y:2013:i:2:p:158-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.