IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v12y2023i2p83-d1059617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Khandakar Farid Uddin

    (School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, 56 Second Avenue, Sydney, NSW 2747, Australia)

  • Awais Piracha

    (School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, 56 Second Avenue, Sydney, NSW 2747, Australia)

Abstract

Sydney, the capital of the Australian state of New South Wales, is geographically divided by socio-economic conditions and urban opportunities. However, the division in Sydney has not been investigated from an urban planning perspective. This research hypothesises that the urban planning system and its practice-produced consequences promote inequalities in Sydney. This study conceptualises Sydney’s urban inequality in the context of critical concepts of neoliberalism, the theory of power, and the right to the city. Based on semi-structured interviews, secondary documents, and data analysis, this research claims that residents of lower socio-economic areas lag behind compared to others. The paper emphasises the significance of a just city and strong community engagement to reduce the disparate urban policy practices that influence urban divides in Sydney.

Suggested Citation

  • Khandakar Farid Uddin & Awais Piracha, 2023. "Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:83-:d:1059617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/2/83/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/2/83/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Marcuse, 2009. "From critical urban theory to the right to the city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 185-197, June.
    2. Abigail Friendly, 2013. "The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 158-179, June.
    3. Kristian Ruming, 2019. "Public Knowledge of and Involvement with Metropolitan and Local Strategic Planning in Australia," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 288-304, May.
    4. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2013. "Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 381-407, December.
    5. Mustapha Bangura & Chyi Lin Lee, 2022. "Housing price bubbles in Greater Sydney: evidence from a submarket analysis," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 143-178, January.
    6. Peter Marcuse & David Imbroscio & Simon Parker & Jonathan S. Davies & Warren Magnusson, 2014. "Critical Urban Theory versus Critical Urban Studies: A Review Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1904-1917, September.
    7. Susan S. Fainstein, 2014. "The just city," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Michael Storper & Allen J Scott, 2016. "Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1114-1136, May.
    9. Nicole Gurran & Peter Phibbs, 2013. "Housing supply and urban planning reform: the recent Australian experience, 2003–2012," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 381-407, December.
    10. Kurt Iveson, 2013. "Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 941-956, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Easthope, Hazel & Palmer, Jasmine & Sharam, Andrea & Nethercote, Megan & Pignatta, Gloria & Crommelin, Laura, 2023. "Delivering sustainable apartment housing: New build and retrofit," SocArXiv z6yn4, Center for Open Science.
    2. Katrina Raynor & Severine Mayere & Tony Matthews, 2018. "Do ‘city shapers’ really support urban consolidation? The case of Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1056-1075, April.
    3. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    4. Korthals Altes, Willem K., 2019. "Planning initiative: Promoting development by the use of options in Amsterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-21.
    5. Murray, Cameron K., 2020. "Time is money: How landbanking constrains housing supply," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. Niedziałkowski, Krzysztof & Beunen, Raoul, 2019. "The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-20.
    7. Sharon M. Meagher, 2015. "The politics of urban knowledge," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 801-819, December.
    8. Donald Leffers & Gerda R Wekerle, 2020. "Land developers as institutional and postpolitical actors: Sites of power in land use policy and planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 318-336, March.
    9. Ji, Qiang & Marfatia, Hardik & Gupta, Rangan, 2018. "Information spillover across international real estate investment trusts: Evidence from an entropy-based network analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 103-113.
    10. Julie Pollard, 2023. "The political conditions of the rise of real-estate developers in French housing policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(2), pages 274-291, March.
    11. Laurence Murphy, 2016. "The politics of land supply and affordable housing: Auckland’s Housing Accord and Special Housing Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2530-2547, September.
    12. Alex Lord & Philip O’Brien, 2017. "What price planning? Reimagining planning as “market maker”," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 217-232, April.
    13. Peter Phibbs & Nicole Gurran, 2021. "The role and significance of planning in the determination of house prices in Australia: Recent policy debates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(3), pages 457-479, May.
    14. Liu, Wen & Beattie, Lee & Haarhoff, Errol, 2021. "Outcome-focused plan discretion for facilitating residential intensification: Exploring the insights and experience of property developers and planners," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Taha H Rashidi & Milad Ghasri, 2019. "A competing survival analysis for housing relocation behaviour and risk aversion in a resilient housing market," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 122-142, January.
    16. Luca, Davide & Terrero-Davila, Javier & Stein, Jonas & Lee, Neil, 2023. "Progressive cities: urban–rural polarisation of social values and economic development around the world," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118275, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Sophie L. Van Neste & Gilles Sénécal, 2015. "Claiming Rights To Mobility Through The Right To Inhabitance: Discursive Articulations from Civic Actors in Montreal," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 218-233, March.
    18. Murray, Cameron, 2019. "The Australian housing supply myth," OSF Preprints r925z, Center for Open Science.
    19. Golnesa Rezanezhad Pishkhani & Mattias De Backer, 2024. "The Micro-Politics of Artistic Production among Artists with a Migration Background," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:83-:d:1059617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.