IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v7y2002i1p113-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The British Experience Of Privatization And Regulation Of The Electricity Industry, And Some Lessons For The Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Stubbs
  • Rafael E. A. MacAtangay

Abstract

The electricity industry was the UK's biggest privatization. It was complex, since part of the industry was a natural monopoly, but some of it could be broken up into competing enterprises. Service imperatives and political considerations inhibited the optimum break-up of generation. Efficiency has improved and real prices have fallen since divestiture, but it is arguable how much scope for radical competitive improvement remains. Imminent reforms under NETA are controversial and, some economists claim, misconceived, risking a new system, like the old, implemented without enough forethought. The Philippines electricity system urgently needs reform, though privatization is problematic, given existing long-term highcost supply contracts. However, reform proceeds, having absorbed some lessons from UK experience: generation has more players, and spatial pricing and separate buyer bidding should avoid some pitfalls of the UK pool. Problems of capital scarcity, imperfections in market information and ineffectual competition policy are likely to empower existing players.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Stubbs & Rafael E. A. MacAtangay, 2002. "The British Experience Of Privatization And Regulation Of The Electricity Industry, And Some Lessons For The Philippines," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 113-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:7:y:2002:i:1:p:113-136
    DOI: 10.1080/13547860120110498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547860120110498
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547860120110498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Armstrong & Simon Cowan & John Vickers, 1994. "Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262510790, April.
    2. John Vickers & George Yarrow, 1988. "Privatization: An Economic Analysis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262720116, April.
    3. Helm, Dieter & Jenkinson, Tim (ed.), 1998. "Competition in Regulated Industries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198292524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Gagnepain, 2001. "La nouvelle théorie de la régulation des monopoles naturels : fondements et tests," Post-Print hal-00622947, HAL.
    2. Stephen King & Rohan Pitchford, 2008. "Private or Public? Towards a Taxonomy of Optimal Ownership and Management Regimes," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 84(266), pages 366-377, September.
    3. Tooraj Jamasb & Paul Nillesen & Michael Pollitt, 2003. "Strategic behaviour under regulation benchmarking," Working Papers EP19, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    4. Fink, Carsten & Mattoo, Aaditya & Rathindran, Randeep, 2003. "An assessment of telecommunications reform in developing countries," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 443-466, December.
    5. Eduardo Saavedra, "undated". "Alternative Institutional Arrangements in Network Utilities: An Incomplete Contracting Approach," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv116, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    6. Lam, Pun-Lee, 1996. "Restructuring the Hong Kong gas industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 713-722, August.
    7. Eduardo Saavedra, "undated". "Renegotiating Incomplete Contracts: Over and Under Investment of Concessioned Public Infrastructure," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv106, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    8. Stern, Jon & Mirrlees-Black, Jonathan, 2012. "A framework for valuing water in England and Wales," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 13-30.
    9. Gual, Jordi, 2002. "Regulatory change in network industries: The Spanish experience," IESE Research Papers D/478, IESE Business School.
    10. Massimiliano Piacenza, 2000. "The Public Transit Systems In Italy: A Critical Analysis Of The Regulatory Framework," CERIS Working Paper 200016, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    11. Angela S. Bergantino & Etienne Billette De Villemeur & Annalisa Vinella, 2011. "Partial Regulation in Vertically Differentiated Industries," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 13(2), pages 255-287, April.
    12. Aad Correlje & John Groenewegen & Jan Jaap Bouma, 2012. "The Regulated Firm in Liberalized Network Industries," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 37, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Mattos, César & Coutinho, Paulo, 2004. "The Duopoly Policy in the Brazilian Model of Telecommunications Reform," Revista Brasileira de Economia - RBE, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil), vol. 58(3), July.
    14. Anne Yvrande, 2000. "The New British Railways Structure A Transaction Cost Economics Analysis," DRUID Working Papers 00-5, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    15. César Costa Alves de Mattos, 2001. "Integração Vertical em Telecomunicações e Fechamento através de Preços de Acesso," Anais do XXIX Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 29th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 065, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    16. Brunekreeft, G. & McDaniel, T., 2005. "Policy uncertainty and supply adequacy in electric power," Discussion Paper 2005-006, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    17. Pun-Lee Lam, 2000. "Dominance in Hong Kong's Gas Industry," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 16(3), pages 303-312, May.
    18. Yin-Fang Zhang & David Parker & Colin Kirkpatrick, 2008. "Electricity sector reform in developing countries: an econometric assessment of the effects of privatization, competition and regulation," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 159-178, April.
    19. von der Fehr, N.-H. & Harbord,D., 1998. "Competition in Electricity Spot Markets. Economic Theory and International Experience," Memorandum 05/1998, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    20. Zhang, Yinfang & Parker, David & Kirkpatrick, Colin, 2005. "Competition, regulation and privatisation of electricity generation in developing countries: does the sequencing of the reforms matter?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 358-379, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:7:y:2002:i:1:p:113-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.