IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v47y2013i9p1594-1606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial Cohesion and Subsidiarity under the European Union Treaties: A Critique of the 'Territorialism' Underlying

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Faludi

Abstract

Faludi A. Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: a critique of the 'territorialism' underlying, Regional Studies . The European Union competence for territorial cohesion is subject to the subsidiarity principle regulating relations between authorities at various levels, each concerned with a fixed space. The literature describes the underlying view as 'territorialism'. In reality space is relative and each area the point of intersection of numerous configurations. Therefore, territorial authorities cannot deal with all aspects of territorial cohesion, nor can territorial representation be the only source of legitimacy. By enforcing the assumption that decisions by representative bodies as close as possible to citizens safeguard democratic legitimacy, subsidiarity is therefore a stumbling block in the pursuit of territorial cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Faludi, 2013. "Territorial Cohesion and Subsidiarity under the European Union Treaties: A Critique of the 'Territorialism' Underlying," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1594-1606, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:47:y:2013:i:9:p:1594-1606
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2012.657170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Faludi, 2007. "Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society1," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 567-583, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krisztina Varró, 2014. "Spatial Imaginaries of the Dutch–German–Belgian Borderlands: A Multidimensional Analysis of Cross-Border Regional Governance," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2235-2255, November.
    2. Marta Cordini & Tatjana Boczy & Ruggero Cefalo, 2021. "Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Pedro Sánchez-Zamora & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion in Rural Areas: An Analysis of Determinants in the Post-Economic Crisis Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Benito Giordano, 2017. "Exploring the role of the ERDF in regions with specific geographical features: islands, mountainous and sparsely populated areas," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 869-879, June.
    5. Francisco Cebrián Abellán & Carmen García Martínez, 2021. "Landscape and Tourism as Tools for Local Development in Mid-Mountain Rural Areas in the Southeast of Spain (Castilla-La Mancha)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Marcin Gospodarowicz & Paweł Chmieliński, 2021. "What Makes the Difference Is the Size and Proximity to the Centre: A Research Approach and Results of Territorial Cohesion Assessment at the Local Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Evers & Joost Tennekes, 2016. "Europe exposed: mapping the impacts of EU policies on spatial planning in the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1747-1765, October.
    2. Bonifazi, Alessandro & Rega, Carlo & Torre, Carmelo Maria, 2008. "Evaluation and the environmental democracy of cities: Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy," MPRA Paper 11055, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Gordon Dabinett, 2010. "Spatial Justice and the Translation of European Strategic Planning Ideas in the Urban Sub-region of South Yorkshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2389-2408, October.
    4. Claire Colomb & Gonçalo Santinha, 2014. "European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Le," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 459-480, March.
    5. Olivier Sykes & Andreas Schulze Bäing, 2017. "Regional and territorial development policy after the 2016 EU referendum – Initial reflections and some tentative scenarios," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 240-256, May.
    6. Liviu-Cosmin MOSORA, 2011. "Local Action Groups, A Solution To The Rural Development Of Romania," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 392-398, June.
    7. Claire Colomb, 2010. "European spatial research and planning, edited by Andreas Faludi," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 677-679.
    8. Štěpán Nosek, 2017. "Territorial cohesion storylines in 2014–2020 Cohesion Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2157-2174, December.
    9. Lisa Van Well, 2012. "Conceptualizing the Logics of Territorial Cohesion," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1549-1567, September.
    10. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    11. Andreas Faludi, 2008. "The Learning Machine: European Integration in the Planning Mirror," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(6), pages 1470-1484, June.
    12. Dominic Stead, 2014. "The Rise of Territorial Governance in European Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 1368-1383, July.
    13. Umberto Janin Rivolin, 2010. "Spatial Units for EU Territorial Governance: Findings From a Study on North-Western Italy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 299-316, February.
    14. Rhys Jones & Bryonny Goodwin‐Hawkins & Michael Woods, 2020. "From Territorial Cohesion to Regional Spatial Justice: The Well‐Being of Future Generations Act in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 894-912, September.
    15. repec:rom:campco:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:392-398 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. David Evers, 2008. "Reflections On Territorial Cohesion And European Spatial Planning," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 303-315, July.
    17. Constance Carr & Tom Becker & Estelle Evrard & Birte Nienaber & Ursula Roos & Evan McDonough & Markus Hesse & Rob Krueger, 2015. "Raising sustainability/Mobilising sustainability: Why European sustainable urban development initiatives are slow to materialise/Territorial cohesion as a vehicle of sustainability/Sustainable urban d," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    18. Golobic, Mojca & Marot, Naja, 2011. "Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 163-173, August.
    19. Mikko Weckroth & Sami Moisio, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion of What and Why? The Challenge of Spatial Justice for EU’s Cohesion Policy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 183-193.
    20. Andrei Sebastian Badea, 2011. "Perspectives On Improving Cohesion Policy Spending," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(1), pages 6-12, March.
    21. Daniel Rauhut, 2017. "Polycentricity – one concept or many?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 332-348, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:47:y:2013:i:9:p:1594-1606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.