IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2021i1p38-d708061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Makes the Difference Is the Size and Proximity to the Centre: A Research Approach and Results of Territorial Cohesion Assessment at the Local Level

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Gospodarowicz

    (Department of Banking Safety Net, Warsaw School of Economics, Niepodległości Av. 162, 02-554 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Paweł Chmieliński

    (Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat Str. 72, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the territorial cohesion of municipalities (gminas) in Poland using quantitative data and non-parametric modelling techniques. The full population of 2174 Polish municipalities divided into rural and urban-rural municipalities was examined. The time interval of the study, i.e., 2005–2017, allows us to capture the changes stimulated by the implementation of the cohesion policy, i.e., the programme of socio-economic transformation in Poland, implemented in the programming period 2007–2013. Using the DEA approach, a general decline in the cohesion index value over time was recorded in the period of analysis. The results of estimating autocorrelation measures indicate a progressive tendency to build spatial clusters, where the size of the local administrative unit (municipality), measured by the population potential and spatial location of the municipality significantly affect the cohesion level. It was also found that there are limits of positive influence of the EU income on the possibility of achieving a high level of cohesion, hampered by a limited resource of own funds. The research method in this paper has been empirically validated and can be applied to territorial cohesion studies in other EU countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Gospodarowicz & Paweł Chmieliński, 2021. "What Makes the Difference Is the Size and Proximity to the Centre: A Research Approach and Results of Territorial Cohesion Assessment at the Local Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:38-:d:708061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/1/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Van Well, 2012. "Conceptualizing the Logics of Territorial Cohesion," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1549-1567, September.
    2. Wolfgang Keck & Peter Krause, 2006. "How Does EU Enlargement Affect Social Cohesion?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 601, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Slawomir Kalinowski & Anna Rosa, 2021. "Sustainable Development and the Problems of Rural Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 438-463.
    4. Andreas Faludi, 2013. "Territorial Cohesion and Subsidiarity under the European Union Treaties: A Critique of the 'Territorialism' Underlying," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 1594-1606, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Sánchez-Zamora & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion in Rural Areas: An Analysis of Determinants in the Post-Economic Crisis Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Gospodarowicz, Marcin, 2021. "Territorial Cohesion Of Municipalities In Poland In 2005-2017 In Terms Of Synthetic Measure, In The Context Of Convergence And Spatial Clustering," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2021(4).
    3. Maria Vasilescu (Dumitrascu) & Claudia Mariana Mungiu-Pupazan, 2014. "Indicators Of Territorial Cohesion," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 265-268, December.
    4. Marian Oliński & Jarosław Mioduszewski, 2022. "Determinants of Development of Social Enterprises according to the Theory of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Mikko Weckroth & Sami Moisio, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion of What and Why? The Challenge of Spatial Justice for EU’s Cohesion Policy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 183-193.
    6. Luca Salvati, 2016. "The Dark Side of the Crisis: Disparities in per Capita income (2000–12) and the Urban-Rural Gradient in Greece," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 628-641, December.
    7. Marta Cordini & Tatjana Boczy & Ruggero Cefalo, 2021. "Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Alena Harbiankova & Elena Scherbina, 2021. "Evaluation Model for Sustainable Development of Settlement System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Łukasz Satoła & Anna Milewska, 2022. "The Concept of a Smart Village as an Innovative Way of Implementing Public Tasks in the Era of Instability on the Energy Market—Examples from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Wirginia Aksztejn, 2020. "Local Territorial Cohesion: Perception of Spatial Inequalities in Access to Public Services in Polish Case-Study Municipalities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 253-264.
    12. Pedro Chamusca, 2023. "Public Policies for Territorial Cohesion and Sustainability in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Patiño-Murillo, Marcela & Sánchez-Zamora, Pedro & Gallardo-Cobos, Rosa, 2023. "An analysis of territorial cohesion in the Colombian context: The case of the municipalities of the Caldas Department," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Damurski Łukasz & Pluta Jacek & Zipser Wawrzyniec, 2020. "Pedestrian accessibility of services as a measure of territorial cohesion at the neighbourhood level," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 49(49), pages 31-48, September.
    15. Benito Giordano, 2017. "Exploring the role of the ERDF in regions with specific geographical features: islands, mountainous and sparsely populated areas," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 869-879, June.
    16. Peter Krause & Daniel Ritz, 2006. "EU-Indikatoren zur sozialen Inklusion in Deutschland," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 75(1), pages 152-173.
    17. Francisco Cebrián Abellán & Carmen García Martínez, 2021. "Landscape and Tourism as Tools for Local Development in Mid-Mountain Rural Areas in the Southeast of Spain (Castilla-La Mancha)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Panagiotis Artelaris & George Mavrommatis, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion as a Policy Narrative: From Economic Competitiveness to ‘Smart’ Growth and Beyond," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 208-217.
    19. Efstathios Grigoriadis & Luca Salvati, 2015. "Recession In Action: Exploring The Spatial Divergence Of Percapita Income In Greece," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 9(2), pages 68-83, DECEMBER.
    20. Alena Harbiankova & Lora Gertsberg, 2022. "Information Model for Sustainable Rural Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:38-:d:708061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.