IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v36y2002i5p495-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Regional Geography of Corporate Patenting in Information and Communications Technology (ICT): Domestic and Foreign Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Grazia Santangelo

Abstract

In the new techno-socio-economic conditions, characterized by an increasing reduction of temporal and spatial barriers, and further globalization of economic activity, paradoxically geography seems to matter more than ever before. This particularly applies to science-based industries (e.g. information and communications technology - ICT), where links between corporate competitors, and firm-university and user-producer relationships are crucial in the development and adoption of new flexible technologies. Using US patents granted to the largest European electronic firms, this paper looks at the interplay between the patenting by domestic and European foreign electronics companies of research and development carried out in ICT fields in German, UK and Italian regions. The findings suggest that patenting is attracted to existing areas of industrial strength taking a form of cumulative causation. Nonetheless, policy measures may be successful in reversing the trend. Sous de nouvelles conditions techno- et socioeconomiques, caracterisees par la poursuite du demantelement des barrieres temporelles et geographiques et par la mondialisation accrue de l'activite economique, il semble que paradoxalement la geographie importe plus que jamais. Cela s'applique en particulier aux industries basees sur la science (a savoir, la technologie de l'information et de la communication - la TIC), ou les liens entre les concurrents, et les rapports entre les entreprises et les universites, et entre les utilisateurs et les producteurs, sont essentiels au developpement et a l'adoption des nouvelles technologies flexibles. A partir des brevets americains accordes aux plus grandes entreprises europeennes du secteur de l'electronique, cet article cherche a examiner l'interaction de la demande de brevets par les entreprises etrangeres nationales et europeennes du secteur de l'electronique pour ce qui est de la recherche et developpement effectuee dans le domaine de la TIC dans les regions en Allemagne, au Royaume-Uni et en Italie. Les resultats laissent supposer que la demande de brevets se concentre sur des activites industrielles puissantes existantes et s'explique par une sorte de causalite cumulee. Toujours est-il que la politique pourrait faire marche arriere. In den neuen technisch-sozialwirtschaftlichen Verhaltnissen, die durch zunehmenden Abbau zeitlicher und raumlicher Schranken sowie durch weitere Giobalisierung wirtschaftlicher Betatigung charaktrisiert wird, scheint der Verteilung paradoxerweise grossere Bedeutung denn je zuvor zuzukommen. Dies gilt besonders fur wissenschaftlich fundierte Industrien (z.B. Informations-und Kommunikationstechnologie (ICT), wo Verknupfungen zwischen korporativen Konkurrenten und Beziehungen zwischen Firmen und Universitaten, sowie Anwendern und Herstellern fur Entwicklung und Ubernahme neuer, flexibler Technologien entscheidend sind. Mit Hilfe von US Patenten, die den grossten Elektrofirmen Europas erteilt wurden, betrachtet dieser Aufsatz das Zusammenspiel von Patentierungen durch inlandische und auslandische europaische Elektronikfirmen fur Forschung und Entwicklung, die auf dem Gebiet der ICT in deutschen, britischen und italienischen Regionen durchgefuhrt wird. Die Befunde legen nahe, dass Patentierungsinstitute von bereits bestehenden Industriegebieten angezogen werden, und damit eine Form kumulativer Kausalitat annehmen. Nichtsdestoweniger konnten Bestrebungen, diesen Kreislauf in entgegengestzte Richtung zu lenken, erfolgreich sein.

Suggested Citation

  • Grazia Santangelo, 2002. "The Regional Geography of Corporate Patenting in Information and Communications Technology (ICT): Domestic and Foreign Dimensions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 495-514.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:5:p:495-514
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400220137119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400220137119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400220137119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohendet, Patrick, et al, 1999. "Knowledge Coordination, Competence Creation and Integrated Networks in Globalised Firms," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(2), pages 225-241, March.
    2. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    3. Swann, Peter & Prevezer, Martha, 1996. "A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1139-1157, October.
    4. Antonelli, Cristiano, 1986. "The international diffusion of new information technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 139-147, June.
    5. John Cantwell & Simona Iammarino, 2000. "Multinational Corporations and the Location of Technological Innovation in the UK Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 317-332.
    6. Bjørn Asheim & Michael Dunford, 1997. "Regional Futures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 445-455.
    7. Cantwell, John & Santangelo, Grazia D., 1999. "The frontier of international technology networks: sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 101-123, March.
    8. Maskell, Peter & Malmberg, Anders, 1999. "Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(2), pages 167-185, March.
    9. Archibugi, Daniele & Michie, Jonathan, 1995. "The Globalisation of Technology: A New Taxonomy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 121-140, February.
    10. John Cantwell & Simona Iammarino, 1998. "MNCs, Technological Innovation and Regional Systems in the EU: Some Evidence in the Italian Case," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 383-408.
    11. Grazia Santangelo, 2000. "Inter-European Regional Dispersion of Corporate Research Activity in Information and Communications Technology: The Case of German, Italian and UK Regions," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 275-295.
    12. Heim, Carol E, 1996. "Accumulation in Advanced Economies: Spatial, Technological, and Social Frontiers," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 20(6), pages 687-714, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riccardo Crescenzi & Luisa Gagliardi, 2015. "Moving People with Ideas - Innovation, Inter-regional Mobility and Firm Heterogeneity," SERC Discussion Papers 0174, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Simona Iammarino & Jan-Philipp Kramer & Elisabetta Marinelli & Javier Revilla Diez, 2012. "Technological Capabilities and the Regional Embeddedness of Multinational Enterprises. A Case Study of Germany and the UK," Chapters, in: Martin Heidenreich (ed.), Innovation and Institutional Embeddedness of Multinational Companies, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Lorena M. D’Agostino & Grazia D. Santangelo, 2012. "Do Overseas R&D Laboratories in Emerging Markets Contribute to Home Knowledge Creation?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 251-273, April.
    4. Csomós, György & Tóth, Géza, 2016. "Exploring the position of cities in global corporate research and development: A bibliometric analysis by two different geographical approaches," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 516-532.
    5. Claudia Werker, 2006. "An Assessment of the Regional Innovation Policy by the European Union based on Bibliometrical Analysis," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2006-11, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    6. Lorena M. D'Agostino & Grazia D. Santangelo, 2012. "The Global Fragmentation of R&D Activities: The Home Region Perspective," DRUID Working Papers 12-06, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simona Iammarino & Philip McCann, 2010. "The Relationship between Multinational Firms and Innovative Clusters," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Dettmann, Eva & Lacasa, Iciar Dominguez & Guenther, Jutta & Jindra, Bjorn, 2014. "Детерминанты Зарубежной Технологической Активности В Германии - Количественный Анализ Транснациональных Патентов [Determinants of Foreign Technological Activity in German Regions - A Count Model An," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 34-51.
    3. Dettmann, Eva & Dominguez Lacasa, Iciar & Günther, Jutta & Jindra, Björn, 2013. "Determinants of Foreign Technological Activity in German Regions – A Count Model Analysis of Transnational Patents (1996-2009)," IWH Discussion Papers 12/2013, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    4. John Cantwell & Simona Iammarino, 2001. "The technological relationships between indigenous firms and foreign-owned MNCs in the European regions," ERSA conference papers ersa01p269, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Janne, Odile E. M., 2002. "The emergence of corporate integrated innovation systems across regions: The case of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry in Germany, the UK and Belgium," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 97-119.
    6. Ascani, Andrea & Bettarelli, Luca & Resmini, Laura & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre, 2020. "Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    7. Cozza, Claudio & Franco, Chiara & Perani, Giulio, 2018. "R&D endowments at home driving R&D internationalisation: Evidence from the Italian business R&D survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 277-289.
    8. Sarianna Lundan & John Hagedoorn, 2001. "Alliances, Acquisitions and Multinational Advantage," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 229-242.
    9. Iammarino, Simona & McCann, Philip, 2006. "The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1018-1036, September.
    10. Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche, 2018. "Global Connectedness and Local Innovation in Industrial Clusters," CIRANO Working Papers 2018s-12, CIRANO.
    11. Basant, Rakesh, 2002. "Knowledge Flows and IndustrialClusters: An Analytical Review of Literature," IIMA Working Papers WP2002-02-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Gary A.S. Cook & Hans Lööf & Naresh R. Pandit & Börje Johansson, 2012. "The influence of clustering on MNE location and innovation in Great Britain," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Governance, chapter 3, pages 53-82, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Fernando A. Ribeiro Serra, 2008. "Open and closed industry clusters: The social structure of innovation," Working Papers 24, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    14. Elisa Giuliani, 2005. "The Structure of Cluster Knowledge Networks Uneven, not Pervasive and Collective," DRUID Working Papers 05-11, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    15. Crescenzi, Riccardo & Gagliardi, Luisa & Iammarino, Simona, 2015. "Foreign multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 596-609.
    16. Cantwell, John & Piscitello, Lucia, 2002. "The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: The role of spillovers and local competencies," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 69-96.
    17. Rakesh Basant, 2002. "Knowledge Flows and Industrial Clusters: An Analytical Review of Literature," Economics Study Area Working Papers 40, East-West Center, Economics Study Area.
    18. Jindra, Björn & Hassan, Sohaib S. & Cantner, Uwe, 2016. "What does location choice reveal about knowledge-seeking strategies of emerging market multinationals in the EU?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 204-220.
    19. Ruth Rama, 2008. "Foreign investment innovation: a review of selected policies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 353-363, August.
    20. Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche, 2018. "Global connectedness and local innovation in industrial clusters," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(6), pages 706-728, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:5:p:495-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.